Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    75,879
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by weatherwiz

  1. It is absolutely stupid, ridiculous, careless, irresponsible, and dumb how horrifically managed and kept this stuff is. How hard is it to maintain snowfall records and data and create a database??? There's all these different databases and they all show different stuff. Create one freaking thing and put it in one freaking place and MAKE SURE IT'S CONSISTENT.
  2. Do you know where all the station yearly snowfall records got moved too or which is going to be most accurate? Found ALB on their NWS page https://www.weather.gov/media/aly/Climate/ALY_Seasonal_Snowfall_Totals.pdf But if you go to NRCC the period of record they have for them is significantly later and the yearly numbers don't match b/c they use Jan-Dec not May - October This is so frustrating and stupid
  3. Where in the heck did all the yearly snowfall records go? Using http://climod2.nrcc.cornell.edu/ but there are some massive differences for some stations that I had written down like 10-years ago. I'm sure too part of it is isn't snowfall record technically July 1 - June 30? For example, I had snowfall records written down for ALB which went back to 1883-1884 but here starts 1939-1940
  4. Been pretty busy and there hasn't been much going on locally...and I've been spending some free time digging into the Northeast Snowstorm volumes.
  5. That is pretty wild looking for tomorrow...wow. Some decent llvl CAPE too.
  6. Got the northeast snowstorms volumes 1 and 2 in the mail the other day (yes I'm embarrassed I went this long without having them). Excited to changes gears and put a ton more studying into winter weather! Last weekend's storm really inspired this change.
  7. I am ashamed to say I don’t have the KU books about Northeast Winter Storms (though I always wanted). Well…after this storm I realized I need them so I just bought both volumes!!! I spent all of my life obsessed and studying severe weather but it’s time to change. I mean how many big severe weather events have we really gotten to study? I want to shift my focus towards mesoscale evolution during big winter storms…but first have to 10000% percent understand mid/upper levels.
  8. Same…this really gets me to watch to switch gears and do some studying/research into winter storms. When it comes to these biggies it seems like at the end of the day mesoscale processes and processes which evolve as the storm is evolution end up having much more of a factor than how the entire structure of the storm is evolving (I guess unless you’re talking about a perfect and clean phase and capture but at the end of the day…how often does that ever really happen). At least for myself, this was a tremendous experience in the forecast/communication process. Obviously from the get-go I was incredibly aggressive (which I had my reasons for). But at the end of the day, if it’s mesoscale and evolution processes…it’s probably best to wait until the final second to really go balls to the wall. It can be communicated prior that extreme amounts are possible but don’t forecast it. One big concern I had too (even prior to making a forecast) was the low bombing out so quickly and so far south all the goods would be confined to bands and we would see more banded structures. With that, it’s almost impossible to know where they will traverse until the mesoscale evolutions are known.
  9. I think in this storm the DGZ is rather low but it’s crazy deep. Always get caught with going too crazy ratios outside of banding…gotta remember this next time. Gotcha thanks. That makes the most sense.
  10. I’m starting to hate these super cold thermals set ups. I feel like unless you’re outside of the band the snow growth is just putrid. Is that b/c the DGZ is just so shallow or more if a product of the lack of sufficient lift into the DGZ?
  11. Just crazy b/c that 700 low is in a prime spot. This system is just so tilted...very weird though to see mid levels closing off in such a tilted system
  12. yup and 700 fronto being tugged with it. just getting onto the computer looking through everything. time to declare me forecast a bust (outside of eastern CT). This is why I stocked up on the alcohol
  13. my guess is it’s because the 700 low is beginning to tighten up so it’s confining closer to the fronto as opposed to just being northwest…but what you’re saying also could be a contributor as well
  14. I’m just going to give myself a swirly now. I was hoping for at least a foot and a half. Stupid dual low Convective robbing piece of crap. Convection fooks us in winter but nowhere to be found in summer. One more period then bed. Why even wake up tomorrow? Bull****
×
×
  • Create New...