Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,567
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Terpeast

  1. Wait, tpv and sw are closer together at 78. Too soon to call
  2. 72. TPV wester, ss s/w easter, west ridge wester. Yeah, its gonna cave I think
  3. Euro to 60, looking at h5, west ridge smidge east, everything else the same
  4. Honestly, I’m almost rooting for the 0z Euro to put this thing to bed so we can move on. Kinda tired of getting strung along
  5. The only expectation we should have is to see better consensus and consistency Monday morning. Comparing vs past few runs show models still jumping around a lot. They just happened to jump in the same direction this cycle.
  6. Gefs actually trended wetter (snow hole notwithstanding, that’ll probably be gone next run)
  7. I didn’t want to say anything, but AIFS verification scores have been beating both op gfs and cmc
  8. I think the ~1060 high is really overdone. Wonder what it will look like if its 1040 instead
  9. TPV over minnesota and coastal off FL
  10. More separation between streams at 78
  11. A tick more separation between tpv and ss vort, precip a tick souther. Too early at 69h
  12. Sorry I get confused with the miller labels sometimes
  13. That’s what you were showing with your drawings on the NAM, right?
  14. If it’s changing that much, then it will continue to change more. This isn’t final
  15. Without looking at the surface and just by these maps, I’d worry about it missing me to my north
  16. Appreciate your analysis as always. I hadn’t had a chance to dig deeper like you did (expecting company soon) and what you said does seem more promising that a SE miss could be less likely. Maybe the models will catch on soon, especially the ensembles. I’ll dig in some more tonight.
  17. Well I hope we both get double digits, but we’ll just have to see how the disconnect between the op and ensembles resolves itself in the next runs tonight and tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...