Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,423
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Terpeast

  1. First and probably final call unless things change dramatically. Last time I was too bullish, so this time I'm being conservative.
  2. Thats what I was thinking. Commanders could also have beaten the Chiefs, though it would have been a much closer game for them.
  3. And the north vs south camps are getting closer to each other. Before they were 50-75 miles apart, now only 25-40 miles. We’re in a good spot I think
  4. It also appears to me that the timing is mainly an overnight event. If we get the rates, it could pile up pretty easily.
  5. 3k nam looks good too, 12k maybe a bit overdone but they’re not that far apart.
  6. Nam gets northern folks in the game too
  7. Halftime show already over? Didn’t realize. Was too busy reading the storm thread
  8. I know its only the half, but it feels like the game is over.
  9. WOW! Philly is killing it right now.
  10. What pass interference? They aren’t playing flag football sheesh
  11. As much as I want to say 5-8”, I was too bullish last time so I’m staying conservative this time. Different storm, different scenario though. Better cold air this time except right at the surface, which can be overcome with moderate rates.
  12. That’s just smoothing across all ens members. But they’re converging on a max between dc and ezf. Still time to tick north, but probably not by a whole lot
  13. As a counterweight, here are gfs and euro soundings. Hrrr doesn’t go that far out, and rgem weirdly doesn’t have soundings on TT but guessing a degree or two warmer than 3k nam.
  14. For posterity. DCA at the middle of the storm
  15. Biggest forecasting question for this storm, from a regional POV, is where the heaviest banding sets up and is someone going to see double digit totals out of this.
  16. 9” dc metro per NAM. i’m thinking 7” high end. 3-6” most likely
  17. Agreed. The s/w for Tue-Wed is still off the CA and Baja coast. It will enter the conus tonight or early tomorrow morning.
  18. Combine the 12k and 3k nam and we get the best of both worlds
  19. NAM shows coastal enhancement that beefed up qpf imo
  20. You’ll be fine on temps. It’s more for 66/50 and south as well as the UHIs
  21. I think the one with higher amounts is computer generated, and the other was edited by a human. But that’s just my guess. 2-5/3-6” seems reasonable considering the marginal surface temps. Someone might good banding that could add an extra inch or two. 8” max upside
  22. Could be right for the UHIs. Burbs like Ashburn and Columbia could see 1-2” otg before dark, then it’ll become easier to tack more on afterward.
  23. Fixed. It’s hard to do this on mobile lol
  24. Sorry I used the wrong snow map. Fixed it, looks even better
×
×
  • Create New...