Jump to content

hazwoper

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,454

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by hazwoper

  1. hazwoper
    They are forecast to rebound.
  2. hazwoper
    Good! Lets get the sun out so it can melt the snow off my panels and I can start generating electrons!
  3. hazwoper
    Gotta love how the 12z GFS initializes the entire area with rain. LOL.
  4. hazwoper
    There will be no mix. This is straight rain to snow
  5. hazwoper
    you had to do it.......... LOL
  6. hazwoper
    Maybe respond to my other two posts above? Of course you won't. You know why? Because, again, the science is settled. While NO ONE can say that the warming we have been seeing is 100% due to man (of course it isn't as there are no real 100% certainties when it comes to climate), man most certainly has been the main factor in the increases over the last century. And BTW, I only put you down because of how absurdly ridiculous your arguments are.
  7. hazwoper
  8. hazwoper
    I am also not saying that the use of FFs over the last century and a half was not a necessary evil for us as a civilization to grow. The thing is that we have come to a place in time where the previous status quo is not sustainable for the longevity of our species and our planet. We have come quite a way since the early 19900s and the time is now to use our collective brains to make for a better planet and one that will continue to thrive long after you and I are gone.
  9. hazwoper
    OK, that is a fair point. I, too am not saying that there are not general variabilities in climate over time, BUT the difference is that I understand that the science is clear that what we are doing is absolutely increasing temps far greater than if we hadn't been here.
  10. hazwoper
    You are clueless about the general climate cycle that has repeated itself since earths formation and its difference from mans continued increases in carbon releases due to burning of FFs. Also, I have a degree in Environmental science, but would never call myself a scientist either. BUT, I am educated enough to understand the difference between the general cycle of carbon on our planet over billions of years and the man caused massive release of carbon in just the last 100-150 years.
  11. hazwoper
    Ohhhh....so you're a scientist. Gotcha. LOL. The science is settled for your information. The release of carbon from the burning of fossil fuels that have been held up in the earth's crust since well before the dawn man are ABSOLUTELY, 100% increasing global temperatures. Its settled science Mr. Scientist.
  12. hazwoper
    For those that don't understand the science of burning FF and releasing carbon, which has been locked in our crust since the dawn of time, and how it is absolutely negatively impacting our climate and in turn our species should probably go back and get an education.
  13. hazwoper
    Trump lost......
  14. hazwoper
    No one.....and I mean NO ONE, start a storm thread. That is all.
  15. hazwoper
    Not "more amped" though. The energy behind it is delayed which allows it to cut. Later redevelopment and weaker.
  16. hazwoper
    Kind of already over winter TBH. LR models show some below average temps, but really the overall pattern doesn't favor many decent shots at storms through 2/17. I mean, I'd take a late month storm, but not holding my breath and honestly after all this cloud cover, I am ready for spring and summer.
  17. hazwoper
    Shame it’s not a full moon tonight. This is the kind of snow that looks like diamonds under a full moon.
  18. hazwoper
    Models struggle with ratios in these set ups. I’ve seen many times over the years where Mt Holly picks up on this fact. Vey low moisture can pile up when the conditions are perfect.
  19. hazwoper
    Trust the professionals
  20. hazwoper
    Hoping for 4”. Wouldn’t be at all surprised to only see 2-3”, but feeling good for some reason. Meh
  21. hazwoper
    It’s currently 32 at my house with a DP of 18. Ho read up on wet bulbing in storms like this one. You might learn something
  22. hazwoper
    Again, post less, read more. Thanks
  23. hazwoper
  24. hazwoper
    Ah, so you know more than professional meteorologists. Got it. Thanks.
  25. hazwoper
    Not based on the mesos, which should be used at this point for small features such as inverted troughs
×
×
  • Create New...