psuhoffman

A lot of guidance is trending towards pinwheeling the low around on Tuesday and swinging snow back through the area north of DC. Have to see if that is real...and if we can get it to happen maybe a bit further south.

bunnies everywhere beware

I am hugging the HRDPS big time

What are you looking at? It gives DC about 8-10" south to north across the district.

GFS has trended southwest with the coastal low capture/stall the last several runs...but without having much impact on the CCB frustratingly lol. But again its super close for DC...this run the capture and tuck happens right at OC which is exactly the latitude that puts DC on the edge for getting into the CCB.

Icon snows into Tuesday night lol

In fairness (dunno until the qpf comes out) I don’t think the rgem is bad it’s just the trend. Big step back from last 2 runs.

Hug the icon.

I know you’re kidding but that wouldn’t help. That’s the last thing we need. That would squash the WAA wave and still wouldn’t help with the coastal. Might even make it phase and amplify slower and end up OTS for everyone. Our problems lie in the typical miller b transfer problems.

Ehh rgem isn’t the NAM but it shifted the ccb northeast quite a bit. Still decent DC northeast but not close to the last few and the trend is troubling.

Rgem still looks better then the nams at 24 hrs. Can already tell it isn’t blasting that dry slot as far north. Too soon on the ccb yet.

I was strictly talking about the slp track

Yes...but sometimes that actually does happen and it’s not a model feedback error. But it can be, especially on the mesos with this type of setup.

Right or wrong (probably wrong) the NAM is chasing the convection and taking the secondary way too far OTS. It’s improving slightly each run with that but not enough. You can see the slp ride up the line of convection that fires out over the gulf steam vs tucking in along the coastal front baroclinic zone.

That is some crazy divergence from the consensus secondary track and capture location. Not even close. Wow

@Weather Will is slacking cue yeoman with “looks like climo”. 6” one isn’t too shabby either keep in mine ensemble members are low resolution and 10-1 so they are going to underestimate snow totals (when you actually do get it lol) if it’s a cold storm or you get under the ccb

@stormtracker 18z was better then 12z

The qpf increased across N VA and DC and snow mean increased about an inch in DC. Combo of both a little more qpf with WAA and a little better CCB

BIG improvement for N VA on eps. Kinda what I had expected with the op track

Any stalled from Lewis Delaware south should at least get some ccb into DC

That could just be due to the double barrel or strung out low configuration you get as it’s captured and loops. Where exactly the lowest pressure is any any one time isn’t that important.

The euro was about 20 miles too far northeast and way underdone with the ccb in that 2010 example. Fwiw

It’s really consistent. It seems to be where the moisture transport from the secondary is meeting up with the inverted trough from the dying primary and enhanced by instability from convergent winds ahead of the h5 and old h7 lows. The gfs has it too just further northeast and it’s not as sharp since gfs sucky resolution and all. On top of its sucky everything else.

General rule with a miller b capture scenario I remember from model diagnostic sessions with Nese at PSU...and it’s worked almost every time historically and over my years of tracking. The cutoff to the CCB heavy snow band will be sharp and right about the latitude that the storm gets captured. There are also rules regarding how far west it gets but this is tucked in so tight we don’t have to worry about that it’s latitude not longitude that’s potentially going to hurt us. Right now all guidance has the capture due east of DC off the Delmarva. Some 50 miles one way or the other. That’s noise. But it’s significant if that 50 miles means a ccb cutoff at Rt 50 v Rt 70! It’s going to be close. For perspective the evolution of this and the current capture location is very similar to Feb 10 2010 with the exception we have a colder airmass in front so a better WAA wave to start. Now that worked out for DC but it was very close. 20 miles south of DC got a lot less snow. 20 miles north got a lot more! So it doesn’t take much adjustment to that either way to have a very different outcome.

Ehh it’s not that radical. The capture happens around 13z on both the euro and rgem. From that point on the low loops around for about 12 hours gaining very little latitude then extends and splits off a northern extension while the southern fujiwaras back south again. That happens off Wallope Island on the rgem and off Ocean City on the euro. Not that big a difference. But when your right on the southern edge...that little bit matters! But the bigger issue is the better moisture transport on the rgem. If you put that from the rgem onto the euro it would still be better. Not quite as good as the rgem but probably could add on another 3-6” in DC. capture moment on both models Euro RGEM