TheClimateChanger

Quite cloudy and hazy today. Probably going to be a slower climb today. Should still reach 90+ with the high starting point.

I don’t think we do it. Tomorrow looks subtly cooler aloft. Probably 91 or 92. Maybe Thursday to Saturday, which looks warmer. Might manage an official 95 or 96 during that stretch.

Inside? What is it inside? A greenhouse?

High was at least 92 at KPIT. Probably 93 or 94, based on 5 minute data. Multiple observations of 34C/93F, but that could be between 33.5C and 34.4C [92.3-93.9F].

Bradford reached at least 90F today, marking only the third time it has reached at least 90F in the month of June since records began in 1957. The other two occasions were both in 2022: 90F on the 16th; and 93F on the 22nd.

Wow, international! It's been upgraded? Where are they flying to internationally?

Anyways, I wouldn't get too worked up over one reading from 1936. The same people who blab on about "it's only summer" and cry about the shading color of the weather map would be saying the same thing about that summer. And, to be quite honest, I think they would have a point. They say it's the hottest summer on record, but this looks like a summer of yesteryear to me (outside of a 1-week hot stretch). June 1936 Central Park Weather Bureau Office July 1936 Central Park Note: Excluding the 7 days from July 8 to July 14, the means are 83.1F/64.5F and 73.8F average for the other 24 days. Weather Bureau Office August 1936 Central Park Weather Bureau Office

Very sketchy reading. Why was it 4F warmer in the park than at the Weather Bureau office in the city that day? Weird, the opposite of what you would expect from the UHI effect. It's also weird that they give precedence to the park's readings over the Weather Bureau readings. Very atypical, as most threaded records utilize the WB office readings.

They really need to switch to wet bulb globe temperature, or some other measure of heat. Weird look when you have one of the hottest June days on record, and not even an advisory. LOT used to be much more diligent about getting the warnings out for the urban heat island.

5-minute observation up to 93F before 11 am, per the ASOS at Burke Lakefront Airport in Cleveland.

From a station serving Steubenville, Ohio & northern West Virginia, but sharing as I thought this was a nice regional map of high temperatures from yesterday. Impressed by the 89 in Johnstown - the airport is at close to 2300 feet, I believe.

It was also the third earliest 90+ reading since records began in 1962. It was 91F on June 2, 2023, and 90F on June 8, 1968.

Looking pretty solid for some classic summer heat right into mid July. Not sure if we’ll see anything as warm as the current stretch (relative to average) but CPC seems pretty confident of continued above normal temperatures.

Wow, I didn’t realize it was that many! At least the storms brought in some temporary relief. Still not ideal for open windows with the high humidity. We must’ve dodged a bullet locally. Nothing more than some small branches down. Much needed rainfall - doubled my monthly total. Wonder if we have a repeat tomorrow. NWS is expecting temperatures as warm, if not warmer, with heights continuing to rise. Might be less coverage with a stronger ridge overhead tomorrow, I would guess?

Up to 94F, which matches the highest temperature since 2018. And as @TimBpointed out, I suspect some shenanigans were afoot with the sensor during that event. Prior to today, only 4 days had reached 94F since 2012.

Unfortunately, the de-urban cold island effect is keeping temperatures in check at DTW.

Northwest Ohio and adjacent areas of Indiana always do well with the heat. I think it's the low elevation - almost like a depression extending from Maumee Bay out to Fort Wayne - and the sandy soils. 5 minute observations show a couple of 99F readings, so likely reached at least 98F (factoring in rounding). These values are rounded in Celsius to the nearest whole degree before conversion, whereas the official readings are rounded from the nearest tenth of a degree in Celsius. Toledo Executive Airport (KTDZ) did reach triple digits. 100F at 2:50 PM. An observation of 100F on the 5-minute observations is a true observation of 100F since it means the rounded Celsius temperature was 38C, which consequently means it was at least 37.5C (99.5F = 100F). Toledo - Toledo Executive Airport (weather.gov)

Regardless, I think some of these commenters on X forget its only June. 1988 had 4 90+ days at this point, and the 5th didn't occur until the 20th. We will be just one day below that. There were 8 by the end of June. Decent odds we match or exceed that, given the likelihood of more heat before the month is through. The mean temperature for June 1988 was 68.5F, nearly 1F below the current average. We are already at 68.4F and will be far above 70F before the end of this week. Incidentally, we've also had less than half the amount of rain this June compared to what we had at this point in June 1988, at the airport. I've barely managed a third of an inch IMBY so far. Of course, this also began a stretch in 1988 where there was basically no rain until the middle of July. Heat built back in on the 4th that year with a high of 93 after a low of 54! I think these same people would be saying "it's JUST SUMMER!" on July 4, 1988. And if someone pointed out that there's been more 90s recorded than in X number of years [decades], they'd say "it hasn't felt that hot. I've had my windows open most nights!" given all the nights in the 40s and 50s. Of course, after the 4th through August, it was a blazing inferno. Could be a case of "be careful what you wish for."

Also part of the reason why 1992 doesn't look that cool at most of the airports. At PIT Airport, it's only 8th coolest summer [tied with 1960], but on NCEI (which obviously has a lot more data), it's second coldest for Allegheny County [since 1895]. 1992 being the one year that stands out in the era due to the Pinatubo eruption.

Well, the 103F on July 16th is probably legitimate. But honestly, yeah, I suspect the others would have topped out in the upper 90s. I get flamed frequently for bringing this up on here, but I'm not making it up. There's literally a plethora of studies showing the readings from the era to be high. Obviously, 1988 was super hot either way. Of the 38 days of 90+, 26 of them were 93 or better. But it's not 100% comparable to the current siting and equipment. And not all readings, just at the "first order" climate sites - typically larger airports.

The history of temperature measurement in America is to constantly produce cooler readings as technology has improved and standards revised, and then have people complain about adjustments and claim it was hotter in the past. Considering the ASOS is installed at 1,203 feet ASL and the buildings in which the downtown temperatures were taken many decades ago were from about 720 to 750 feet, taken on a rooftop with only passive solar shielding (LiG thermometer housed in a shelter, and no fan aspiration), one can only wonder what the temperature would be today. Absolutely ridiculous that mean temperatures over the past 24 months have been on par with the hottest years in the threaded record. Anyways, y'inz stay cool out there this week. Already up to 82F as of 9:51 a.m., with a heat index of 84F. 90+ looks like a foregone conclusion today, unless a storm forms by noon and sits over us the rest of the day.

When you consider instrument bias, what looks like a similar (if not hotter) stretch of summers in the late 1980s and early to mid 1990s, in fact, is cooler than most recent summers. You can choose not to believe this, but my bet would be warming will soon be sufficient to surpass 1995. And in the next couple of decades, warming will be substantial enough that numerous summers will be surpassing 1995. Because that's what the trend shows since installation of the ASOS in 1996. We finally have nearly 30 years without the NWS making some significant change to siting or instrumentation, and look, it's warming and FAST. Regression shows 2.2F of warming over that period in the summertime.

IMO, the problem boils down to this: The NWS sees "oh, this is the strongest ridge on record" and looks at past similar setups and then correctly assumes temperatures will be even higher this go around. Makes sense, since H85 temperatures are higher and ridge heights much higher, but there's no bias correction from the past observations. I've repeatedly - and correctly - pointed out that ASOS runs about 1-1.5F cooler than the HO-83 hygrothermometer it replaced in 1995/96. There's a reason why so many of those summers in the roughly 10-year span when the defective HO-83 was in place are among the hottest on record. The bias was not equal between night and day, but higher during the day - particularly on sunny days with light wind and a high sun angle. The same conditions that are typical of heat waves. So some of those days were likely overcounted by 2, 3 even 4F. This also coincided with some hot summers, no doubt, but not as hot as the records would suggest. Sources: climo_rpt_96_2.pdf (colostate.edu) - Study of 79 first-order climate sites between 1994 & 1995 found an average annual max temperature bias of +1.16F, and an average annual low temperature bias of +0.95F from the HO-83 relative to the ASOS installation. Comparison of ASOS and HO-83 temperatures at Lincoln, Nebraska from November 1991 through October 1992 (noaa.gov) - 12-month study from Lincoln, Nebraska study 1991-92. ASOS was from 1.4 to 2.6F cooler for maximum temperatures every month, and from 0.7 to 2.5F cooler for minimum temperatures. An Investigation of Temperature Discontinuities Introduced by the Installation of the HO-83 Thermometer in: Journal of Climate Volume 8 Issue 5 (1995) (ametsoc.org) - Another study, somewhat smaller estimate of 0.6C bias - actually suggests less bias in summer, but not sure that is correct. Ironically, I learned about this decades ago from climate change deniers. At that time, they were blaming climate change (in part) on this faulty sensor. Obviously, a ridiculous argument since U.S. first order airport sites make up a very small fraction of the USHCN sites, and almost zero percent of the global climate stations [the majority of which is water, after all]. But I correctly guessed it would turn to pointing to these same years as being evidence it wasn't warming as much as they said. The HO-83 Hygro- thermometer « Climate Audit - cites some more sources, particularly about Tuscon and how the NWS could not confirm a global warming signal in the deadly Chicago heat wave of 1995 because the readings were likely inflated by instrument bias