George001

That’s a great way to set yourself up to be disappointed. I learned that the hard way….

Good read. We don’t always agree, but I respect the transparency about your previous outlooks. I wish more seasonal forecasters would be as open about the results of their previous forecasts. It appears that we agree about the pacific, and where our forecasts differ is the polar domain. I’m solidly in the 1972-1973, 1991-1992, 2018-2019 camp. Considering that you are forecasting nearly twice as much snow for my area as I am, I hope you are right.

2m anomalies?

Agree. Whether the nino falls short of super or not, there is a very real chance the strength of the nino derails winter for snow enthusiasts in the east.

I was on board with a historic super nino too, but the data doesn’t support that anymore. The ONI graph in particular is misleading, as the 2023 El Niño event began diverging from the super events after September. 82-83, 97-98, and 15-16 all were above 2.0 by now. Right now it’s evolving more like a slightly stronger version of 57-58 than the super events. Don’t get me wrong, this nino is far from weak. It’s looking more like a +1.8-1.9 peak than a +2.3 or higher though.

That’s true, it doesn’t always translate but I would rather see a favorable pattern in November than an unfavorable one. The strong nino -PDO combination historically has been unfavorable for cold in the east. We need the polar region to cooperate, and the early signs aren’t looking too great for that.

Forky likes warmer weather like Snowman19 and Torch Tiger do.

The -PDO is the most concerning thing for winter lovers in the east. Regardless of whether the Nino peaks at 1.6, 1.9, or 2.2, if there is a -PDO with it I’m going warm. Also, there has been a barrage of storms entering the Pacific Northwest. I don’t like seeing that.

72-73 is a solid analog, yes this nino likely won’t become super like that one did, but most guidance has it peaking as a high end strong event. This isn’t a true east based nino like 97-98, the structure is also a good match (basin wide but east lean). The combination of strong nino and -PDO is another thing that matches 72-73.

I’m expecting around half of that in the Boston area this winter.

Good. La Nina’s after strong/super ninos tend to be quite snowy in the east.

Strong El Niño decembers typically aren’t favorable. That’s why we probably won’t know what this winter is truly made of until mid January or so.

Agree 100%. Especially se mass, expecting big snows in November and December is setting yourself up for disappointment. Especially with a strong nino in place, December climo isn’t favorable for us. That’s why I am not expecting any snow events here for at least the next 6 weeks.

That’s actually my biggest issue with Bastardi. He is not some random idiot on Twitter. He’s a successful meteorologist with a big following. I don’t like him, but he’s not an idiot, in fact he’s actually quite intelligent. He has forgotten more about meteorology than many weenies including myself will ever learn in our entire lives. He is pushing this harmful AGW denier agenda to get clicks, and it’s working. The random idiots on twitter aren’t concerning, it’s the smart conmen with big followings like Bastardi who are. I wish he would put that knowledge he has to do good rather than misleading his audience about climate change.

It not only significantly underestimated the eastern warmth, it also missed the western US troughing. Just a completely different pattern. I agree with you about taking these models with a grain of salt.

I don’t have an issue with that. Bastardis AGW denial agenda is problematic and is a big reason why his forecasts have been busting too cold and snowy.

I am seeing a lot of storms on the models hitting the Pacific Northwest and then tracking west to east near the Canadian border. I am seeing some talk about potential for an early winter storm threat, but with that storm track I think it’s more likely we will be south and east of the low. That’s not a snowy storm track in the heart of winter, never mind in November. That is why I do not agree that we will have a snow threat in eastern mass over the next couple of weeks. I believe we will get more rain instead.

Yeah, seems like the guidance is converging on a peak in the 1.8-1.9 range. I initially thought it was going to be a super nino, but it looks like it’s going to fall a bit short.

Appreciate the support, hopefully we get at least one big one this year. I’m interested to see if you are leaning above or below average in eastern mass for snow, based on your posts you seem to be a lot more optimistic than I am about this coming winter. Your analogs are snowier than mine, but there are some bad winters in there too. I don’t think we will truly know weather the milder forecasts or snowier ones will be correctly until mid-late January though. Even the more optimistic posters expressed agreement on December being shitty.

Fair point, it’s a decent match for precip. For ENSO, I’m expecting this nino to be stronger and more east based. If I am wrong about that 2009-2010 would become a better analog. Regardless, it looks like my initial idea of a 2.2-2.3 ONI peak will be incorrect. I like the higher end of your ONI range (1.9). The enso development deviated from my expectations this October. November will be a big month for sure in regards to telling us more about ENSO development.

For my analogs, I am leaning more towards 1991-1992, 1997-1998 (weaker nino obviously, but I think the general pattern will be similar), and 1972-1973 than 2009-2010 and 2002-2003. The reason why I don’t like the 09-10 and 02-03 analogs is the fall pattern is different. The storm track is more north and it is significantly warmer. In previous winter forecasts I made, I failed to take the fall pattern into account, which resulted in my analogs being bad. 2018-2019 is not a great enso match, but I think it’s a decent analog for the pacific pattern. That winter had lots of storms tracking across the pacific northwest, and then when the storm track shifted south we got a nice noreaster in March.

Factors: El Nino: east leaning high end strong to low end super, ONI of 1.8-2.0. MEI expected to be lower, but still in strong nino territory. Regardless, the El Niño is expected to be quite powerful and a major pattern driver. Polar region: +NAO expected, with a strong and circular polar vortex parked over the North Pole. The Siberian snowcover is advancing at a below normal rate, which favors a strong polar vortex and +NAO in the winter. The solar max also is correlated with a +NAO. Pacific pattern: +EPO, -PNA expected early on, transitioning to weakly -EPO and +PNA in Feb-Mar. The PDO is rising, but I am expecting there to be a “lag effect” where it takes a few months to break out of the raging -PDO pattern that has been taking place the past couple of years. AGW: The climate has changed, we are significantly warmer than we were during some of my analogs (72-73 being my top analog, and 57-58 being another one). Therefore, the expected temp profile needs to be adjusted a few degrees higher for these analogs to adjust for the modern climate. Storm track: Right now we are seeing storms move across the Pacific Northwest and are tracking well west of the area, similar to last winter. It is likely that this is related to the -PDO. I do think that will change in Feb-Mar, but overall I expect the storm track to remain inland, rather than the slightly offshore track that would lead to snowier outcomes for the Boston area. This due to a combination of the expected lack of blocking and western troughing during the first half of winter. Snow forecast: 20-30 inches of snow for the Boston area, +4 to +5 AN DJF. What could go wrong? A lot. The El Niño could be weaker than expected, especially the MEI. A polar vortex split is highly unlikely due to the factors I mentioned above, but a disruption is possible. This could lead to a more wintry outcome than expected, but could also lead to a winter like last year if the cold air is on the other side of the globe. It is weather after all, and weather is humbling for even the best meteorologists. It would be foolish for an amateur weenie like myself to be arrogant enough to think I have it all figured out, but I sure as hell am going to give it a shot. If I’m wrong, I will learn from it. I love the cold and snow, but the factors I am looking at have me leaning towards lows tracking to our west, which is a mild outcome for New England. That said, I do think we will have a couple shots for a good old fashioned nor’easter/blizzard once the pacific starts to cooperate a bit more in Feb-Mar (expected due to Nino climo + weakening -PDO regime). I don’t think we will get a ton of opportunities, but I do think the window will be just enough that we get one to break our way.

My forecast is 20-30 inches of snow for the Boston area for the 2023-2024 winter. No, not for one storm, for the ENTIRE winter.

Where’s the cold coming from? The latest Siberian snowcover data is not promising for getting the polar region to cooperate. I don’t like seeing that, a strong to super nino, and a -PDO.

2009-2010 was a strong El Niño. 87-88 was weird, it peaked strong but weakened rapidly after that. It ended up being a moderate nino during the winter. By 1983 do you mean 83-84 or 82-83? 83-84 was a la nina so that’s not a good analog, but 8 did see some mentions of 82-83 being a good analog. 82-83 was a super nino so that makes sense. Does it mean winter is going to necessarily be bad? No, it all depends on where you live. The mid Atlantic does well in stronger ninos like this one, so a good winter in say DC-NYC is a very realistic outcome. There is nothing weak about this El Niño though.