George001
-
Posts
5,028 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by George001
-
Feb 28th-March 1st long duration Miller B threat
George001 replied to George001's topic in New England
It’s not 6-10, it’s 12-18 even on the weaker runs. -
Behind Feb 28th- March 1st Miller B there is another huge storm behind it on the models. It is cutting right now yes, but I am noticing a strengthening signal for secondary redevelopment. The crazy thing is, as strong as the late Feb/Early March storm looks to be, the one right behind it looks just as big if not bigger.
-
Feb 28th-March 1st long duration Miller B threat
George001 replied to George001's topic in New England
This does have more upside if the Euro is right but even if the other models are right that would be a great result. 12-18 inches with another monster a few days later. -
Yeah, the NAM seems to do well with these storms. My area was never expected to get much in terms of snow accumulations, but the changeover to sleet was a couple hours faster than expected.
-
My weather app says it’s snowing out. Thats not right, it’s raining. It was sleeting earlier but changed over to rain.
-
Feb 28th-March 1st long duration Miller B threat
George001 replied to George001's topic in New England
Congrats Philly DC isn’t going to happen, not in a Miller B. -
It’s coming, the models had this storm cutting for a while but over the past few cycles it redeveloped further and further south. Now it is looking like a full blown Miller B, with the models showing not only showing 24+ hours of heavy snow, but they are also showing strong winds. With the model consensus rapidly converging on the long duration Miller B solution rather than cutter, it is likely we are looking at a New England blizzard, with the potential to become a historic blizzard (top 10 all time) in the Boston area.
-
Gfs is now on board
-
Gfs suite is on its own
-
With blocking that strong the 50/50 isn’t going anywhere. Unless the blocking weakens a lot I like our chances. The only model not on board now is the gfs.
-
Holy shit…… even half of that would be a huge storm.
-
Realistically what’s the ceiling for this?
-
I hope it’s right
-
This isn’t like the others, we are tracking a storm with blizzard potential in the mid range now. Even the late December threat which once looked promising was cutting into Wisconsin once it got to the 6-7 day range.
-
Euro doubled down and we now have the Canadian on board. The best part is, this is without a doubt a Miller B. I’m all in
-
The cold air thing is a valid point, but it is important to consider that if the storm is strong enough it can make its own cold.
-
The Euro is the best model we have and it’s not clown range. Even a blend of the Euro and Gfs would be good, something like the Canadian for example. Yes it’s not as good as the Euro but it still gives us a plowable snow.
-
Long duration too, holy shit that’s a burial.
-
Euro has a Miller B
-
He is 100% correct, the pattern looks very similar to early December with a strong block and trough out west. However, that doesn’t mean we are going to get the same results. Wavelengths are shorter in March and the ssts aren’t nearly as warm as they were in December. There is also the probability aspect of it, if you get that pattern in Dec 10 times do we go snowless 10 times, or did we get unlucky in a favorable pattern? No pattern has a 100% success rate.
-
If it’s extreme cold yeah, it seems that now if the pattern is even the slightest bit unfavorable we get extreme warmth. It looks like the acceleration of climate change is a big reason why we are seeing so many extreme warm anomalies but very few extreme cold ones. Even out west has not been as cold as we were warm, and the trough has been parked over there the entire winter. I don’t understand how people can see this shit and then say “Welp there isn’t enough evidence that climate change is real and accelerating, it’s just cyclical”. Yes, weather is cyclical but this extreme warmth goes far beyond cyclical variation or natural change in the climate. This isn’t normal in any way whatsoever, I’m sorry but people who think this is just natural fluctuation or cyclical have their heads stuck up their asses, or are making big $$$ from oil companies. You bring up a good point about relying on old analogs and the issues that come with it due to our climate being warmer than it used to be.
-
Yeah, we haven’t had a potent nino for a while now. Last time we had a nino exceed moderate strength was 2015-2016, 7 years ago. It likely won’t be quite that strong, but coming off a 3 year Nina I think there is a good chance it will exceed at least moderate strength. We won’t know for sure until May or June though.
-
2C? Damn that’s super nino territory
-
I’ve gotten burned in these swfes ripping and reading 10:1 snow maps. Those are especially horrible for these because they count all frozen precip as snow. That’s fine when you are getting all snow, but when you are getting sleet and or ice (which my area especially often does in these setups) 10:1 maps significantly overestimate snow totals.
-
I saw in your blog that you mentioned concern about the mid levels tracking well inland, which isn’t a good setup for big snows in SNE. It looks like your first call is going to end up being the right idea. That goes to show that the models are good if used correctly, rather than just ripping and reading 10:1 snow maps. That’s why I was skeptical of those gfs 10:1 snow maps that gave even my area a foot. I saw the image on your blog of the mid level low going into Canada and lowered my expectations for snow accordingly (for this threat). The models are still waffling around some so I’m not really sure if for my area I should expect more sleet or ice.
