ORH_wxman

Interior NW of 495 doesn’t qualify as ratter imho right now. Maybe way NW line Mitch to Hippyvalley has been ratter territory. But ORH to Ray 495 belt and back to Monads has been ok…subpar but not too awful. December being a disaster brings it down a peg though.

‘55-56 is a good example.

Yeah me too. That western ridge isn’t that far east. In addition, you can see later in the period how the Aleutian low is starting to migrate east and trying to become a GOA low. That will also start making things more precarious the further south you are. Now maybe the NAO offsets it enough or the Aleutian low never makes it far enough east to beat down the western ridge (weeklies sort of reload it further west in late February/early Mar), but I’d always be leery of things that can push the goods further north because that has been a recurring theme.

That system is an uphill battle imho. It’s prior to advecting in a decent airmass so it’s gonna have to thread the needle (surprise!)…guidance currently progressively gets more favorable beyond that timeframe.

It’s snowman19’s passive-aggressive way of trying to downplay any potential in the pattern for mid-February and beyond. Ray sniffed out his M.O. pretty well. I’ll personally be watching shortwaves dive out of Canada and anything southern stream…others can worry about dips and peaks in Nino 3.4 in February if they want.

The Atlantic blocking has been getting stronger as we go deeper into February on ensembles. I just hope the PAC doesn’t go hostile after 10 days…even if it just goes to neutral after 10 days, a strong -AO would work fine (ala Feb 2021)…but hopefully both remain favorable for longer.

I think there was a major controversy at BWI for that storm. They were clearing every hour or something like that. Same thing happened at BOS too…BOS real total was prob more like 23” instead of the “record” 27.6”.

Ray’s favorite storm. Id take it though. Over 20” in ORH and that extended right down into the 495 belt here.

Could end up dry for second half of February but it also might not. It’s a split flow pattern out west.

Stratosphere is getting interesting on guidance too. Some support showing up for another big SSW like last year in Mid-Feb (this helped set the stage for the first couple weeks of March last year where he had several threats including the interior elevation bomb on Mar 13-14. ) The difference this year is that if we get another SSW like last year, we won’t be fighting nearly as hostile as a Pacific and the AO already looks to be negative. So it just may lock things in place longer which is what you’d hope for if you want more than a short period of favorability. We’ll know a lot more about the SSW chances in the next 5-7 days.

It’s a fair criticism. I don’t trust them either until inside of D10. But at least they aren’t can-kicking and there’s pretty strong signals on them. If they continue to look good by Sunday/Monday, then I’d feel a lot more optimistic.

Yeah I do like that it’s not a really fast “in and out” pulse…the longwave pattern is amplifying for most of that week in the middle of the month. It offers a nice background assistance to anything that wants to try and develop to our south. It’s the type of look where you might see a storm on guidance that you can track for over a week. Of course, it could also be the type of pattern where it can’t decide which shortwave to focus on and we end up with another shit sandwich. But I’m hopeful that spacing interference will be harder to achieve because the background PNA ridge is going to try and force the issue more than the baseline would.

What’s interesting on the 12z GEFS (and EPS was showing this as well) is that the western ridge is amplifying the entire time once it starts around D10-11. So that means you could have any number of shortwaves during this period be prone to big cyclogenesis….that’s a constructive interference look there rather than a de-amplifying ridge providing destructive interference.

Yeah this is typically a massive bright spot on the historical calendar for major snowstorms…esp during El Niño. But we’re going to get zippo over the next 10 days. The irony too is the last week of February is a historical min so we’re going to have to break that trend if we want to play catch-up unless we land a monster in the Feb 13-20 range (entirely plausible). Yeah, there’s been exceptions like the 100 hour storm in late Feb 1969….but it’s surprisingly devoid of major storms considering mid February and early March are hotspots.

Yes. That’s why I like the look so much…it risks some huggers/inland runners but it has Atlantic blocking to try and counteract that. It’s a very good look. I’m sure we’ll talk about the thousands of ways we can roll snake eyes as we get closer or the pattern progged unravels, but as of now, that’s a look we want. Active/cold/somewhat stable.

Yeah you could prob push everything out a week now that we have a better idea of what guidance looks like. Biggest unknown left this season (aside from actual snowfall since you can’t predict nuances) is how long does that favorable longwave period last. Is it 2 weeks and then early spring? Or does that blocking developing into a self-sustaining prophecy that takes us to the equinox? Hard to say…maybe it’s in between too and takes us to around 3/10-3/15.

So the problem is snowfall is not a normal distribution. It has a high tail because of the fact we can’t have negative numbers on snowfall. So the easiest way to exclude outliers equally in a fast/crude manner is to put your entire array of values in a column on excel (you prob already did this)….now go to “formulas” tab on the top of the spreadsheet and go to the drop-down menu that says “more functions” and then go to “statistical” and then scroll all the way down to “Percentile.exc”. Once you do that it’s going to ask you select the array of values, so click on the first value of your snowfall total, hold shift, and then select the last value so that it includes all of them in the array. Now, below the array line there is a “K” value. For your 10th percentile value, type in “0.1” and you should see a low-ish snowfall value appear below the K line on the right. That is your 10th percentile snowfall value…write it down or type it someonewhere . Now do the same thing for 90th by inputing “0.9” for the K value. Once you have have your 10th and 90th percentile values, you can toss all values above the 90th and below the 10th if you want to exclude outliers in an even manner. This gets rid of the problem of trying to use methods you’d normally use for a normal distribution. Now you could do this for any percentile value you wanted. If you wanted the 50th percentile, you type in 0.5 into the K line…for 25th you input 0.25….you get the idea.

Now we know the weeklies are actually going to be correct and we’re gonna rip snow bombs into the equinox like its 1958.

I’m surprised there were no -10 inch snowfall seasons.

Yeah if we can set up a true blocking episode…it will help prolong the favorable look so that maybe we have longer than just a 7-10 day window. I’m skeptical until it’s right in front of us. Weeklies do try and run with that blocking and take us well into mid-March at the end of their run still with a favorable look. Not that any of us should trust the weeklies.

Pattern mid-month still looks excellent. But it’s pretty much snoozefest for 10 days before that…only question is whether we can sneak a 60F nape tanner or two in there at the end of next week/weekend. But the pattern beyond that is still about as good as you could draw it up.

Yeah there were three of them that always teamed up and reported totals within an inch or two of eachother in those bigger storms. And they were always higher than everyone else in that area.

Positive bust too. Was supposed to be like 8-12” and a slot but at the last second the rgem scored the coup on secondary development which prolonged the snow into afternoon and early evening.

4th biggie kind of missed you too on 2/15