-
Posts
90,937 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by ORH_wxman
-
Over-stating attribution is just as anti-science as implying there is none.
-
What is the physical mechanism though? Models aren't taking a hypothetical mid-20th century climate and trying to apply it to 2023.....they are ingesting real time data. A smaller PV might make the model performance a bit worse because models perform worse in lower gradient environments....however, the model verification score improvement is at odds with that theory becoming dominant. Models are improving faster than any sort of "shrinking PV" can offset that performance.
-
No it does not mean that.....just the average temp of the globe was 1C cooler. The arctic is where the most warming has happened, so it might be like 4C cooler there....while in many tropical areas it hasn't warmed at all. In our case in the state of MA, if we take the average DJFM temps from the middle 20th century and do a least squares regression, we've warmed at about 0.18C per decade which equates to about 1.3C of warming where we are. So it happens that our area is pretty close to that 1C of warming as it turns out but that won't be true everywhere.
-
No it wasn’t directed at you but I’ve seen some posts from others that hinted at it WRT ensemble forecasts and such not verifying as cold. And yeah, I don’t think it’s controversial to say “if this event happened in a world where it was 1C colder, then it would have been more wintry”….duh
-
Attribution studies are inherently imprecise. We know CC is obviously making things warmer….however, I don’t see much utility at all in discussing CC as it pertains to forecasting using NWP guidance. The laws of atmospheric thermodynamics don’t change. Model guidance is not going to be too cold or too warm because of CC. They are simply taking actual data (which is from a CC world) and then simulating the atmosphere with that data using the laws of thermodynamics and physics.
-
Man, and that was the one good storm all winter.
-
On the single station menu selection, select "seasonal time series" and then under "options" you choose "average temperature" and then under "period of interest" on that same selection you choose when you want the time series to be for.....I selected "other" and put the date 1/1-1/20 in there. HVN has issues though with all that missing data from 1979-2001. A place like BDR would have the full record.
-
I haven’t looked at any of the hovmoller charts but I know the gfs was being a lot more aggressive taking MJO into phase 4 on the RMM plot while EPS was killing the wave into the COD. So not sure if that is playing a role.
-
Seems like the EPO ridge is staying further east on the EPS and not retrograding back to WPO territory. It also stays quite poleward which helps. That sucker is way up into the east Siberian sea
-
Yeah I’m still heading against it but the more guidance that shows it, the more likely it becomes. Even the 12k closed off h5 right as it was passing under us…so there’s a reason to watch it. It takes a lot of things to like to get those big rates. I’m expecting snow for much of SNE tomorrow but I’m leaning toward just steady light snows for the most part that might have trouble accumulating…esp low elevations and further south. But hell, even a bit of a compromise would help in getting 2-3” for many.
