Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    93,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. Wow that’s awesome. It’s not even up by CAR and it’s mostly under 500 feet. For those wondering where Lee Maine is
  2. Nah, you had a high of 45 last year on east winds with sheet drizzle. It’s the same thing. Annual occurrence.
  3. ORH sitting at 37 /15 at peak insolation in 2nd week of May.
  4. Maybe he shops at whole paycheck? I’ve seen some hefty bills there. But yeah, I’ve been going every 7-10 days and it’s comes out to around 150-200. You can tack on another 25 for a produce pickup we do at a food distributor every week. Those are actually pretty cool...they have all this extra inventory they usually ship to restaurants but obviously aren’t doing much of that right now. So you can order boxes for 25 bucks that have a ton of produce. Def would cost 40-50 at a supermarket.
  5. Just had some flurries move through. Didn’t matter that the temp was 40F. Straight flakes falling into that faux sfc warmth.
  6. Yeah he’s trying to move the goalposts based on some moron media members playing up a historic snowstorm angle. He’s totally ignoring the airmass part now. He will likely try and claim that when it hits mid-40s for a high, that the same thing happened last year even though it was onshore flow and sheet drizzle (and will ignore the low temps).
  7. Measurable on winter hill from the heavy snow last hour
  8. Typical May observation. Not sure what all the fuss is about KORH 091248Z 29022G32KT 1/4SM R11/2400V4000FT +SN FZFG VV009 M01/M03 A2953 RMK AO2 PK WND 29032/1247 P0000
  9. Just your normal below freezing snow ob at ORH. Typical Annual May occurrence.
  10. KORH 091238Z 28016G25KT 1/2SM R11/4000V5000FT SN FZFG VV012 M01/M03 A2953 RMK AO2 PK WND 28027/1211 P0000 T10061028
  11. Too bad this CCB couldn’t wrap up like we saw on some runs a couple days ago. Legit cold to tap.
  12. Too early to get a good handle on the low. We need to wait until mid/late June. Jaxa (and Area) at this point in 2012 was higher than 1996 (the highest min year on record).
  13. One of the all time greats in interior MA. Had around 27” in ORH but officially I think the airport reported 22”...but that was during their ASOS outage snow disaster years...their final report came like 12 hours before the snow ended. Lol. Despite that, it was actually a mild underperformer if that’s possible. Mets were going 3 feet plus here. Still, can’t complain about a storm that breaks 2 feet.
  14. DMI volume is a bit suspect....I'd prob use PIOMAS and then definitely Cryosat2 when that updates more fully later this spring. PIOMAS has volume currently 5th lowest. Still low, but not dead last like DMI. 2017 is pretty far alone in last place at this point.
  15. That makes sense. 22z would be 6pm and it was still light out so that matches my memory. Doesn't get dark until closer to 7 in late September. Looks like it started around 5:40pm.
  16. There's plenty of peer review research to read that will argue humans aren't responsible for the increase in CO2, but in reading them, you'll note that they don't hold up under scrutiny as time passes and other papers rebut them and they aren't able to counter those rebuttals. So they are fewer and fewer these days. I would suggest reading literature across all spectrums and not try and muck up the thread by insisting you know more than these papers.
  17. They didn't attempt to quantify the non-climate factors though which was a bit frustrating in reading the study. I just finished reading it and they sort of just decide that VPD fits well enough that it is dominant. That might be true but it would have been nice to try and isolate it from the non-climate factors which they admitted is something they weren't doing in the paper...so we could see numerically how dominant it actually is.
  18. It's actually not clear at all for "the current event" given that the autumn attribution is extremely weak to non-existent. It seems the trends are stronger for summer. From the most recent paper you linked: This is the problem with some of the attribution studies that are in a shorter time span. Esp starting in the middle 20th century.
  19. I actually remember the snow on 9/30/92. I was outside playing and it started as a shower and quickly went to graupel and then some legit flakes mixed in at peak intensity. It was pretty awesome.
×
×
  • Create New...