tunafish
-
Posts
2,022 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by tunafish
-
Feb 28th-March 1st long duration Miller B threat
tunafish replied to George001's topic in New England
Does that mean a more northern transfer to the secondary? -
4.1" on 0.49" event total with the 7A obs. 18.9° and dropping. SN. See if we can catch the band dropping down from Lava land before this goes to showers for the day.
-
Sleet line seems to be washing out. Drew this line at 455 and really hasn't advanced in the past 20.
-
0.3" at midnight after the first 90 minutes of precip. See where we're at come 7A.
-
30/15 and first few pixie flakes. That dried out area Dendrite/Coastal mentioned is concerning.
-
They usually don't go making big changes to graphics this close in. Took me from 6.0" earlier today up to 7.3".
-
GYX taken' 'em back up.
-
41/17, PC
-
little Ditty quiet today. must be on his way to the dispensary for ginx.
-
The "Those guys can't hear us, right?" tells you he knew what he was about to say is wrong, but still went for it anyways.
-
That was my reaction too. I don't care what your political affiliation is. If you hear that and think "not a racist comment" you're completely delusional, intentionally kidding yourself, or just lazily going with the "hurr durr woke mob cancel culture" layup line of thinking. People need to be held accountable for saying these things. Otherwise you give it the green light in the future.
-
Wife and kids are supposed to drive PWM to Dendrite land via 95>101 Thursday early afternoon. Precip rates look light at that time, so I'm assuming crews will be able to stay on top of road conditions. Keep seeing cold tuck and mixed precip, which is my concern. Bad assumption/idea to drive?
-
Anecdotally...and fwiw... I've been tracking GYX forecast amounts to actuals for PWM this year (and last) after (Chris, I think?) mentioned they have an over-forecast bias. This year they've been remarkably accurate. They are under-forecasting to the tune of 7.6", half of which came on the 12/16 event. They have only over-forecast on the 1/25 event (by 2.3")
-
Only through hr 55. we have several hours left to go at that point (I think).
-
Certainly not. Was surprised to see this after the mention of the NAM moving S (synoptically). In actuality, it took PWM "Point" forecast on these maps from 6.5" to 5.7", enough to drop the range even though it's less than an inch different. Will just be nice to cover up the mud again.
-
GYX slashing some
-
How far north are those torched mid-levels on the NAM? Asking for a backyard near me.
-
Other than 2-3 T observations, we're at 0.4" for the month, though yesterday was the first day since mid Jan our depth has gone <1", so we've at least had that.
-
Like my 40' on the coast?
-
Nothing for you " up there"?
-
Was gonna set the o/u at 72.5
-
35F, flipped, pounding
-
Bretton says unlikely as well.
-
Just saw a tweet saying its from dust kicked up in OK. Hmmm
-
I'm trying to find the article, but I did read that the vapor from the chemical attaches itself to water molecules, so if there's any lingering vapors coming from the ground, they could be getting absorbed. I really want to believe it's not related, but like I said, it's awfully coincidental.
