Yep. Northern energy won’t be sampled until at least Wednesday.
Two camps I’m now seeing:
1. Traditional models mostly show a flat, weaker wave
2. AI models mostly show a partial/full phase with a robust Miller A.
I know in western NC which option I’m pulling for.
We’re at an interesting crossroads. The AI models almost all have a partial or full phase and a much more classic looking Miller A. The traditional models are mostly in the weak, flat camp.
It’ll be interesting to see what solution wins. I know which camp I’m rooting for.
All in all, I like where we’re at right now, even if we’re still awaiting the Euro. I’m getting a feeling that we’re looking at a true CAD event regardless of how amped or not amped the system is.
Euro AI at 18z is almost exactly the same as its 12z run. 4-6” region wide and a damn near perfect position for the low. I know we don’t have a long track record with it, but several Mets speak highly of it and it performed well for tomorrow’s storm. It’s had the most consistency we’ve seen so far even though that’s not saying much.
I may have to move here permanently for the remaining analysis because what will still work for us won’t work for many and I’m not reading through the whining.