LibertyBell

Didn't we have this in the 2006-07 winter too? I am using that as an example where while it didn't snow a lot (and it was during an el nino too) we did have that aforementioned 6-8 week period of cold, did that one occur later than this one is projected to? I remember December and January were both mild and the cold didn't make it here until just before the VD 2007 storm and stuck around long enough for the St Paddys Day 2007 storm, but I remember it was cold well into April too and we had the Tax Day 2007 noreaster in mid April. The first three weeks of April were colder than the first three weeks of January! It hit 70 in January but did not in April until the last week! Our total snowfall was just shy of a foot, but we got a ton of sleet. What was the lag period in 2006-07 between the SSW and the cold weather arriving? And that cold period lasted for 60 days?

Air Pollution shortens life by 2 years on average, more than tobacco smoking does. The one benefit of the pandemic was that the air and water became cleaner. In urban areas air pollution shortens life by up to 10 years, causes genetic mutations and asthma.

No it's better to stop using methane too (I refuse to use the inaccurate term "natural gas")-- it's dirty methane, pure and simple. In Oklahoma you all have earthquakes because of fracking, it's a major reason why we banned fracking here. Get to solar and wind and even nuclear and regardless of whatever side effects you have from dumping all fossil fuels, it needs to be done. It's the long term solution worth short term pain. Methane is a far more potent GHG than CO2 is-- regardless of how long it stays in the atmosphere

The corporate media is definitely a huge part of the problem. They never give it the coverage it deserves, but instead give negative coverage to protests.

The fear though comes from people not wanting change. We had a big fight here recently in which the pro windfarm people won and construction has begun on an offshore windfarm-- we are decades behind Europe on this and need to catch up The antiwindfarm people were making ridiculous arguments that windfarms kill whales and dolphins. But on social media, specifically X/Twitter, we are seeing the rise of a strong antiscience sentiment. There are even lists being made of past and current scientists whom these people think are masonic cultists. They say to not believe anything that Newton, Copernicus, Kepler or Einstein said and even that the earth is flat and we never went to the moon. I always thought this was a fringe movement, but it seems to be growing. A fascinating sociological study could be made of the degeneracy of current society.

It's like delaying chemotherapy until the absolute last moment because you're afraid of side effects. But not thinking about how much worse a quickly spreading cancer is.

this is why the whole idea of "averages" is unscientific, with both temperatures and precip (including snowfall), the climate is always changing so there is no such thing as average or normal.

trust me that was a lot better than both before and after when we didn't even get any 6" snow events lol

Look at the 80s when the winters were actually colder but we had less snow lol and we all know the 70s were colder, and yet still less snow.

the 92-93 through 95-96 period was great, it was before and after that were bad.

this is a tremendous point, and as Bluewave posted earlier, in Australia this is behaving more like a la nina, with the high rainfall totals in Queensland. We want something more akin to 2015-16.

Probably the best storm in that kind of a strong el nino since there was over a foot of snow all the up to your latitude, I think?

Yes exactly-- and this would cause the extinction of deciduous flora and flowering plants, we would be going back to a Mesozoic like era where tropical flora like ferns and palms would dominate and amongst the rise in biodiversity would also be a higher number of dangerous microbes and more pandemics.

Don have you read this and what do you think? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/12/venus-was-like-earth-until-climate-change-uninhabitable/ The planet Venus once likely had surface temperatures similar to present-day Earth, recent modelling has revealed. It probably also had oceans, rain, perhaps snow, maybe continents and plate tectonics. But Venus's climate was permanently altered when catastrophic volcanic eruptions released vast quantities of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Could Venus's fate hold stark lessons for us here on Earth? We can learn a lot about climate change from Venus, our sister planet. Venus currently has a surface temperature of 450℃ (the temperature of an oven’s self-cleaning cycle) and an atmosphere dominated by carbon dioxide (96 per cent) with a density 90 times that of Earth’s. Venus is a very strange place, totally uninhabitable, except perhaps in the clouds some 60 kilometres up where the recent discovery of phosphine may suggest floating microbial life. But the surface is totally inhospitable. However, Venus once likely had an Earth-like climate. According to recent climate modelling, for much of its history Venus had surface temperatures similar to present day Earth. It likely also had oceans, rain, perhaps snow, maybe continents and plate tectonics, and even more speculatively, perhaps even surface life. Less than one billion years ago, the climate dramatically changed due to a runaway greenhouse effect. It can be speculated that an intensive period of volcanism pumped enough carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to cause this great climate change event that evaporated the oceans and caused the end of the water cycle.

Don a scary number of people believe we never went to the Moon....and even more scary, that the earth is actually flat! X/Twitter has become a bastion of such views, and recently there was a list put on there of "freemasons" who are not to be believed and on that list is: 1. Newton 2. Copernicus 3. Kepler 4. Einstein So basically any forefather of modern science is not to be believed according to them.

circa January 2016 lol

that was the only decade in the teens right? and the 70s were in the low 20s?

Did 1957-58 have a very mild December too? I know February and March were absolutely amazing.

la ninas after el ninos are usually our snowiest winters as you know

and the summer will probably be extremely hot, as summers after strong el ninos usually are

70s and 80s were much less snowy than the 90s, the 80s especially, no above normal snowfall seasons that entire decade

weak to moderate phases are becoming much less common

22-23 isnt even on this list and ended up the highest ranking in futility?

So this was when the warmth of the historic 1931-32 winter began.....

Thanks I'm headed up there in a couple of hours! So a little less than an inch up my way?