Jump to content

EastonSN+

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,917

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by EastonSN+

  1. EastonSN+
    HRRRR still rolling here is latest panel
  2. EastonSN+
    Thanks! I think the lowland posters in this forum will migrate to the next threat tracking room! In this end this is historic, and we will likely not see this again in our lifetime (unless you are one of the "the SER will dominate our winters and it will be hard to snow going forward unless it's a perfect pattern" crowd
  3. EastonSN+
    Yeah it's pathetic. 2019/20 and 22/2023 mirror 97/98 and 01/02 as horrible close proximity winters. Regression to the 80s.
  4. EastonSN+
    Didn't Forky say this may end up jackpotting Maine?
  5. EastonSN+
    Welp, we got the worst winter in our history almost over, Should be all smooth sailing from here!
  6. EastonSN+
    Latest GFS.
  7. EastonSN+
    Little more
  8. EastonSN+
    Still going
  9. EastonSN+
    I honestly think the Reggie snow map I posted earlier will be close to what is realized. Right now only the 3k NAM helps us.
  10. EastonSN+
    Looks like Reggie
  11. EastonSN+
    I hope he's right. Only the 3k looks good for my area now. RGEM, NAM and GFS are a non-event.
  12. EastonSN+
    RGEM.
  13. EastonSN+
    I mean, we still have the 3k NAM.
  14. EastonSN+
    Snow depth change for GFS.
  15. EastonSN+
    Yeah the fact that the EPS backed up the op runs is a huge red flag. GFS look awful too. Hopefully NAM saves the day.
  16. EastonSN+
    Yikes. I guess the EPS would follow the op this close in. It must have really cut back on totals then for southern parts of the forum .
  17. EastonSN+
    I hope the EPS proves the op runs to be off it's rocker.
  18. EastonSN+
    I really hope your right.
  19. EastonSN+
    Yeah, perhaps it's just the way things have gone for us since 2015 save 2021. Seems that we either are too far west or the storm bombs too far north or something else. Not sure what's causing it or how long until it flips back to pre 2015. EPS will be interesting.
  20. EastonSN+
    How do we stop that so the NAM ends up correct?
  21. EastonSN+
    So for us coasties it's down to just the NAMS.
  22. EastonSN+
    Fear this may end up a strung out mess that just benefits the higher elevations.
  23. EastonSN+
    Freaking terrible
  24. EastonSN+
    Thanks
  25. EastonSN+
    It looks like the OP GFS is on its own. This looks more like the CMC.
×
×
  • Create New...