Just a quick note....unless we some significant commitment towards faster redevelopment so that this is more of a Miller B, I would take some of these OP runs that are going try to drop over a foot with a big grain of salt. 12z EURO tried to do this. Pretty good rule of thumb is that you need the conveyor belt mechanics of closed mid level lows to the east in order to achieve that.
I like him, I just don't care for the NYC perspective lens...just post the maps and save that. That's all I meant....I worded that more harshly than I meant to.
Not a big deal, but usually the fact that its a New England sub forum gives adequate context to get a pretty good idea of the prevailing perspective lol
No, its just allows systems to track further in than many would want. I'm not saying that is what happens or what guidance shows....just speaking theoretically.
Well, it is bad if its more near the EPO domain because its probably more of a NNE pattern, with cold between rainers. That was 2018-2019. I know by
"bad" you mean warm, but to me, bad is cold-rain-cold-rain.
I think this is a more accurate representation inland, though probably too conservative inside of I 495 with that high, as NARCAN tends to be. General 6-10" from pike points N, and 3-6" from I 84 to the pike.