Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,468
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Short/Medium Range Thread


John1122
 Share

Recommended Posts

fk6Evn4.pngSelfishly, I'm more interested in the one closest in time currently. There looks to be a lot of energy with that system and a decent shot to overperform for someone from the east TN/southern apps part of our region.  What catches my eye about this one is the GFS (normally our progressive model) is the one that closes off at 500, slowing the flow and popping a lee side low, while the Euro briefly closes off in the Ohio Valley, but quickly opens back up and scoots harmlessly out to sea.

The initial system aside, I think the follower has the potential to be a big system.  If you cycle through 500, the piece of energy around day 6 as shown on the 12z GFS comes in much further west through western Montana.   Interestingly, even though at the surface it was a smoke show for the entire midsouth, it could have been even bigger if the piece from the four corners had gotten out in front of the energy diving south through the Dakotas (shown above) allowing for a phase.  

It's this piece in the four corners that detaches from the flow that @Carvers Gap notes as something to watch around the 20-21st.  The Euro is much different in the evolution regarding the follower.   Lots will change in the next couple of days, but even the Euro while saying no shows quite a bit of "potential".

 


  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro deterministic didn't look terrible.  Indeed, its ensemble is much different than other ensembles, BUT has trended towards the other cluster of ensembles (eastern intrusion of BN heights after the 20th) since yesterday.  That tells me the EPS is probably still correcting.  FWIW, the EPO ridge appears to have some staying power.

I think the spacing and timing of the next three windows is incredibly important - 15th, 17th, and 20th.   Amplified troughs will often over perform IMHO.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 18z GFS will unlikely have the big storm on the 17th as the cold front is not ingesting a tropical system from the Pacific!  Haha.  Still, I think we see some light snows traversing some portions of the forum.  edit:  Although, there still is Pacific feed to the Southwest of the front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 18z AIGFS actually has that connection but w/ the Gulf.  I do think there is a better than decent chance the GFS is on to something in regards to the 17th system tapping subtropical moisture - more likely a Gulf feed.  The 18z GFS is pretty putrid, but it wouldn't take much for that to be stronger.

Interestingly, the 12z GFS run just looked really amplified from the word "go."  We have seen that from the GFS since November, ie a really bad tendency to over amplify all features on the map.  I have to think there is a programming change for that to keep occurring.  This 18z run looks a little more realistic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, true Reb.  I was like, "What the heck?" when that next slide hit.

I have an old rule that says when a strong cold front drags its feet along the Gulf, that tends to allow for cyclogenesis. You can watch that front hit the waters of the Gulf, and immediately moisture flows north.  A word of caution w/ that setup, and have been shafted many times by this scenario...if that develops(assuming real) convection along the Gulf, it will stop the moisture feed north.

 I don't trust the Pacific feature feeding in, BUT(and this is a big but) the synoptics with this run used the Gulf feed scenario which is more plausible.  Still, it is the GFS.  However, the GFSAI got to a similar place.  If the Euro AIFS continues to have it, that would be incredibly encouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I have posted this for a few days.  When you see 500 Geopotential maps that look like this, that is the setup for a good winter storm in the Upper South.  Moisture feed from the southwest as very cold air crashes in. 

I remember a storm in 1985 which did something similar.  How do I know this?  My dad was hauling oil from St Louis that winter.  He called and said that he had been barely driving in front of a winter storm the entire trip back to TRI.  Sure enough, he pulled in and snow moved in immediately.  We had 2-3 foot drifts of cold driven snow in my yard by the next day...I didn't live in the bubble at the time.  I have to think this is a similar setup.  

c824b3a9-d680-445b-aef0-de328e3f6d34.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

The entire run at 12z was 1-3 feet over most of the state.  That is just the second storm.  

Not gonna get my hopes up too much, but I would squeal like a little girl if that came to fruition lol. My wife and I have twin boys that are 18 months old and we're hoping for a big snow they can enjoy.

We took them out in those snow squalls we had come through this past November, they didn't know what to think!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tnweathernut said:

I don’t think we are close enough to discuss timing.  I’m still trying to determine if the threat is a legit threat.  Got a little closer today though, IMO.

Les keep that HOT sign on.  Just like a Krispy Kreme sign.  Love me some sugar donuts. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...