Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,590
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

MO/KS/AR/OK 2025-2026 Winter Discussion


stormdragonwx
 Share

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, StormChazer said:

12Z NAM

 

1769364000-W29DNj7hbYI.png

Man that cutoff is getting dangerously close to me here. Though it seems the NAM is the outlier here. But 8 times out of 10 I have noticed the WAA or dry slot kills it on the day of it seems. I think the year before last was a great example of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, stormdragonwx said:

Man that cutoff is getting dangerously close to me here. Though it seems the NAM is the outlier here. But 8 times out of 10 I have noticed the WAA or dry slot kills it on the day of it seems. I think the year before last was a great example of it.

Luckily, this type of setup doesn't really give us a dry slot issue, so that's good news.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little rock warning leaves open the possibility of some sleet contamination for northern arkansas. Not sure its going to be a big deal, but definitely something to watch as we get closer. 

SGF upgraded and also leaves open the possibility of some sleet in their southern most counties. Seems like the NWS is really buying the stronger warm nose. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its wild to me that so many models are still kicking out roughly 1" of QPF and were only 36 hours out from onset. I really thought those would start to come down, but so far, QPF is really holding steady. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 1:32 PM Official forecast hazardous outlook graphic shows 7-14" with areas of 8-15" in nearly every part of SGF's territory. Now time for the 18z NAM to screw it up somehow. 

EDIT: 18z NAM going to the first round a bit farther north again due to the strong WAA with sleet/mixing becoming an issue in northern Arkansas and Oklahoma. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, JoMo said:

 1:32 PM Official forecast hazardous outlook graphic shows 7-14" with areas of 8-15" in nearly every part of SGF's territory. Now time for the 18z NAM to screw it up somehow. 

EDIT: 18z NAM going to the first round a bit farther north again due to the strong WAA with sleet/mixing becoming an issue in northern Arkansas. 

Just north of that line is going to get hammered from wave 1, with another substantial wave to go. Is someone really going to see 20" out of this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MUWX said:

Just north of that line is going to get hammered from wave 1, with another substantial wave to go. Is someone really going to see 20" out of this? 

Some 20-22" Kuchera amounts, Springfield down to Benton county, AR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ouamber said:

UGH... I DID NOT LIKE THAT NAM RUN FOR TULSA! :axe:

I just truly don't see that verifying, I think the NAM has a warm bias and the sleet stays 1 or 2 counties south of Tulsa.

THe high resolution actually keeps the sleet south(2nd wave yet to occur on this run).

1769320800-XJDV7GhVJwQ.png

  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks! I'm taking a deep breath! I've been soooo burned here in Tulsa for the last several years!! The "Donut Holes" around the metro made me very bitter and skeptical of all models! LOL Even Travis didn't understand it!! image.png.3bea23cda43b54ef111b1ec898ecb3e8.pngimage.png.c0564f8e101a5a7312ac87928befaf69.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ouamber said:

Ok, thanks! I'm taking a deep breath! I've been soooo burned here in Tulsa for the last several years!! The "Donut Holes" around the metro made me very bitter and skeptical of all models! LOL Even Travis didn't understand it!! image.png.3bea23cda43b54ef111b1ec898ecb3e8.pngimage.png.c0564f8e101a5a7312ac87928befaf69.png

This will forever be the most frustrating thing I have ever experienced as a snow lover. I'll never forget I had a work function that lasted 3 days, and we flew in our team from Mexico, and this one lady had never seen snow. I GUARANTEED her she would get to see some, and we proceeded to get the infamous donut hole. Beyond upset...

BUT, this is a system that no matter what, we are getting 5-6 inches out of, even in the most bust type of situation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main concern (possible failure mode) here in Wichita, is how these two waves impact us. The first piece of energy kicks out Friday night and will initially need to saturate dry air. How long does that take and how impactful is this initial wave? Should we underperform, that leaves us with the 2nd wave, (the ejection of the main ULL) which could miss us to the South and East. By failure mode I mean, failing to hit the upper echelon of some of modeled totals. Think we're in for a solid Warning criteria snow regardless. Getting closer to kicking this thing off! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MUWX said:

For the first time in a while, we have a pretty big step down on the GFS. Everything else still seems on board but that was a not insignificant step back on the GFS.

There was? 

The 18z still pumped out close to one foot here in Kansas: image.thumb.png.c1a50824fc2bba227069795e29dbfb5c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...