Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

PTC 4


GaWx
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • GaWx changed the title to PTC 4
Potential Tropical Cyclone Four Discussion Number   1
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL       AL042022
400 PM CDT Fri Aug 19 2022

Showers and thunderstorms associated with the broad low pressure 
area in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico have become better 
organized during the last 24 h, and reports from an Air Force 
Reserve Hurricane Hunter aircraft indicate winds near 30 kt.  
However, both the aircraft and scatterometer data show that 
the disturbance does not yet have a well-defined circulation 
center.  Since the system is likely to develop further and make 
landfall as a tropical storm in less than 36 h, advisories are 
being initiated on Potential Tropical Cyclone Four with Tropical 
Storm Warnings being issued for portions of the coasts of 
northeastern Mexico and south Texas.

The initial motion is a somewhat uncertain 315/12.  The disturbance 
is on the southwest side of a subtropical ridge, and a general 
northwest motion should continue until the system moves inland over 
northeastern Mexico.  The track guidance is tightly clustered, and 
the forecast track lies close to the various consensus models.

The disturbance is in an environment of light westerly vertical 
shear, and this should continue until landfall.  This should allow 
continued development until the system reaches the coast, and the 
official intensity forecast calls for a peak intensity of 40 kt 
near landfall.  It should be noted, though, that the global models 
do not develop the system significantly before landfall, and if 
they are correct any development could be slower than currently 
forecast.  The system will weaken after landfall, and by 60 h it 
is forecast to be absorbed into a larger low pressure area forming 
over western and northern Texas.


KEY MESSAGES:

1. Tropical storm conditions are expected across portions of 
northeastern Mexico and southern Texas on Saturday, where a Tropical 
Storm Warning has been issued.

2. Rains from the system may begin to affect the eastern coast of 
Mexico from northern Veracruz into southern Tamaulipas tonight into 
early Saturday.  This rainfall may produce life threatening flash 
flooding and mudslides.  Rain from this system may move into far 
south Texas during the day on Saturday.  


FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS

INIT  19/2100Z 20.7N  94.5W   30 KT  35 MPH...POTENTIAL TROP CYCLONE
 12H  20/0600Z 22.0N  95.6W   35 KT  40 MPH...TROPICAL CYCLONE
 24H  20/1800Z 23.8N  96.8W   40 KT  45 MPH
 36H  21/0600Z 25.6N  98.1W   35 KT  40 MPH...INLAND
 48H  21/1800Z 27.1N  99.6W   25 KT  30 MPH...INLAND
 60H  22/0600Z...DISSIPATED

$$
Forecaster Beven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StruThiO said:

lol

Lol what? It got shredded this morning and is just an open wave… I’m honestly shocked they designed this as a PTC. Maybe I’m wrong and this blows up to a 35-40 kt micro TS right before landfall  but this is not the look of something developing. It’s had nice convective flare ups for days and I did think that strong MLC meant it could take off after the peninsula but it got sheared this morning and now has <24 hrs to do anything and looks like it’s going through a convective minimum at the moment. Tiny system though, these are hard to forecast especially if you’re talking the difference between a 30 kt wave and a 40 kt TS. Name is the only difference at this point 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ed, snow and hurricane fan said:

It looks like the plane should fly in, I suspect they'll find either a TD or NHC will PTC it to issue watches for Mexico, but the hurricane models are not impressed.  If this goes Humberto before hitting Tampico (give or take), at this point, it would be a good demonstration of models needing improvement.  Looking at SHIPS and wondering why things are all zero or negative on intensity

99L_SHIPSFactors.PNG

Near zero or negative intensity factors, I didn't think things were that hostile, but whether for the right reasons or night, SHIPS was correct to not be impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol

WTNT44 KNHC 200231
TCDAT4

Potential Tropical Cyclone Four Discussion Number   2
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL       AL042022
1000 PM CDT Fri Aug 19 2022

Based on the current infrared and microwave satellite data, the 
system does not appear to have a closed surface circulation yet and 
is therefore still not a tropical cyclone.  The mid-level center is 
estimated to be located in the southwestern portion of the deep 
convection.  Since there has been little change in organization 
after the Air Force reconnaissance left the system, the initial 
intensity is held at 30 kt based on that data.

The disturbance is moving northwestward at 12 kt.  This general
motion is expected to continue until landfall Saturday night in
northeastern Mexico as the system is steered by a ridge to its
northeast.  The official track forecast is very similar to the
previous advisory prediction and closest to the correct consensus
model guidance.

Slight strengthening of the system is expected before landfall. 
Global models predict the vertical wind shear to increase in the 
next day or so, which should limit future organization and 
strengthening of the disturbance.  The NHC intensity forecast 
continues to show a peak of 40 kt before the system reaches the 
coast.  It is worth noting that this intensity prediction is 
slightly above the guidance envelope.  After moving inland, the 
system is expected to weaken rapidly and dissipate within 48 hours 
near the Texas/Mexico border.


KEY MESSAGES:

1. Tropical storm conditions are expected across portions of
northeastern Mexico and southern Texas on Saturday, where a Tropical
Storm Warning has been issued.

2. Rains from the disturbance may begin to affect the eastern coast 
of Mexico, from northern Veracruz across parts of Tamaulipas and 
Nuevo Leon, during the day Saturday. This rainfall may produce 
life-threatening flash flooding and mudslides. Heavy rain may also 
move to the far south Texas coast through Saturday night, producing 
local flash, urban, and small stream flood impacts.  


FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS

INIT  20/0300Z 21.8N  95.2W   30 KT  35 MPH...POTENTIAL TROP CYCLONE
 12H  20/1200Z 23.2N  96.3W   35 KT  40 MPH...TROPICAL CYCLONE
 24H  21/0000Z 25.1N  97.6W   40 KT  45 MPH...TROPICAL CYCLONE
 36H  21/1200Z 26.9N  99.1W   30 KT  35 MPH...INLAND
 48H  22/0000Z...DISSIPATED

$$
Forecaster Bucci/Cangialosi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't look that great to me.  Looking at the old blue-gray color scale shortwave IR on CIMMS and TT site, the storms are S and E of the most obvious circulation.  Maybe it is weak enough to organize a new center under the convection, but I watched the Dr. Cowan video, he seems to know of what he talks, I can't see why models aren't impressed myself, but they seem to have been correct so far and I think this might be the first ever PTC to landfall and dissipate.  Unless I missed one.  I assume instead of a name waster it will just waste a number if that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, hawkeye_wx said:

This one isn't going to make it.  It showed promise early yesterday, but the convection poofed and it never really came close to closing off a defined circulation.  It's a weak mess this morning and there is little time left over water.

 

Everything is a fight this year. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO- this should never have been designated a PTC. Recon clearly revealed an open wave yesterday, it had limited time over water, absolutely no model support even after being labeled an Invest, and a marginal shear environment to work with. I understand it was close to land but we can’t label every wave close to land a PTC. If it had TS force winds already (Like PTC 1) or some model support or some semblance of a developing circulation per recon, I wouldn’t question this. However lacking all of the above, the decision was questionable 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthHillsWx said:

IMO- this should never have been designated a PTC. Recon clearly revealed an open wave yesterday, it had limited time over water, absolutely no model support even after being labeled an Invest, and a marginal shear environment to work with. I understand it was close to land but we can’t label every wave close to land a PTC. If it had TS force winds already (Like PTC 1) or some model support or some semblance of a developing circulation per recon, I wouldn’t question this. However lacking all of the above, the decision was questionable 

On the science, probably, on taking the course of least regret, I disagree.  NHC has two missions, and one is public safety.  Dr. Bob Sheets made the decision to not 'issue a last advisory' when then Tropical Storm Andrew was found to be a 40-50 knot not quite closed wave, restarting advisories 12 or 18 hours later could have led to confusion or delayed reaction.  PTC was the course of least regret for a wave with a small area of night quite TS force winds.  PTC is a built in safety factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ed, snow and hurricane fan said:

On the science, probably, on taking the course of least regret, I disagree.  NHC has two missions, and one is public safety.  Dr. Bob Sheets made the decision to not 'issue a last advisory' when then Tropical Storm Andrew was found to be a 40-50 knot not quite closed wave, restarting advisories 12 or 18 hours later could have led to confusion or delayed reaction.  PTC was the course of least regret for a wave with a small area of night quite TS force winds.  PTC is a built in safety factor.

I agree with the safety factor but we’re talking worst case scenario here a quick short lived 35-40kt storm. That’s not something the public needs to be aware of, despite gale warnings for sea and flash flood watches. If it had TS force winds I’d agree with the PTC designation. Why was the last system not designated a PTC while this was? That one was more organized and caused more rain than this will?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, NorthHillsWx said:

I agree with the safety factor but we’re talking worst case scenario here a quick short lived 35-40kt storm. That’s not something the public needs to be aware of, despite gale warnings for sea and flash flood watches. If it had TS force winds I’d agree with the PTC designation. Why was the last system not designated a PTC while this was? That one was more organized and caused more rain than this will?

If you are who I think you are, and have a name near identical to mine (I am EMM, I think E and M match if I am correct) and a web page of cool 1970s NY winter storms (I lived in Massapequa then), the person who trolled you for what turned out to be a correct point was ill advised as your posts are always valid, even if you might make a mistake occasionally.  You follow Donald Sutherland as one of the best non-mets on the board, better than an always trolling red tag and a weenie Florida red tag,

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/19/2022 at 10:17 AM, GaWx said:

 Based on the vis loop I just saw, I think the NHC chance for a TD forming will rise later today from the current 40%. With that, the chances of this becoming the first NS for this month are also rising imho. This may already be near TD status.

 Edit 10:45 AM EDT: With what appears to me to be a developing surface low with plentiful convection over the center, SSTs near the warmest in the Atlantic basin at 30 C/86 F, likely at least 18 hours left over open water/24+ hours before landfall, and this often being a favorable area to develop per history, I think this has a high chance to make it all of the way to TS status. Looking back, there have been a good number of examples of a TS forming within 24 hours of leaving the Yucatan as still a sub-TD near this location and with this trajectory.

 Bust! But good news for those impacted.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GaWx said:

 Bust! But good news for those impacted.

I’ll give myself kudos here: I never bit, especially after they flew that plane in there

I did think it had a chance while it was still over the Yucatán but it clearly was sheared and disorganized after it entered BOC. Lesson for all: wait for recon/ascat before jumping to conclusions on convection 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...