Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,216

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. brooklynwx99
    it's impossible to actually have any sort of debate on this because there isn't enough data yet, and people mainly just use anecdotes and a lot of confirmation bias. i'm sure that there have been snow events that climate change helped out or made more prolific than they would normally be
  2. brooklynwx99
    even if you slice the positive anomalies in half, you don't want a +6C airmass heading into any kind of snowfall event. it likely wouldn't work regardless. for as many flawed snow events, we also got a shit ton of rain, but nobody cares about the 8/10 times that it rained in these kinds of patterns fair, I get your overall point, but that's not a setup that would have worked in a long time. it's too warm leading in
  3. brooklynwx99
    i'll have agree to disagree on that one
  4. brooklynwx99
    yeah you're getting that trough to roll under the ridge and lead to wave breaking. it's moving forward in time and is supported by extended guidance so it seems legit for now
  5. brooklynwx99
    i don't think this would have snowed in 1873 with this antecedent airmass
  6. brooklynwx99
    yes, I can see a lobe from the TPV extending and providing “fake” confluence
  7. brooklynwx99
    i agree. and yes, the same point you mentioned in your last post is similar to March 2014 when the NAO was so positive that systems got suppressed the “+NAO is good” stuff is BS
  8. brooklynwx99
    roll it forward a few days
  9. brooklynwx99
    the extension likely forces a -PNA that can lead to another blocking episode. combine with an Aleutian Low and slightly retracted jet and bang
  10. brooklynwx99
    there was a +EAMT that overextended the jet. we’ll see a good pattern once the jet inevitably retracts, similar to what happened this week
  11. brooklynwx99
    looks like there’s a potentially legit PNA spike before the Pacific jet becomes too much to handle. 3 sigma at near our latitude is no joke
  12. brooklynwx99
    i wouldn’t exactly consider that a torch considering that the first few days of that window can skew the whole thing above average
  13. brooklynwx99
    it's the same evolution that led to this current pattern, but in better climo and with shorter wavelengths. it's annoying for sure, but I don't see it ending winter or anything like that
  14. brooklynwx99
    +EAMT led to too much momentum in the jet. we will have to wait until the jet retracts, which it will. those momentum bursts don't last for very long they're great in Ninas where we need the jet to extend, but it's too much of a good thing here
  15. brooklynwx99
    exactly. it's really frustrating, but everything was in place for a big one and the minute details just didn't line up. the overall pattern was very good, but you still need everything to come together
  16. brooklynwx99
    that's not how that works. read Will's post above since you seem to not want to hear it from me
  17. brooklynwx99
    the pattern didn't fail because it was too warm. it's way more than cold enough it's because of crappy little nuances that are impossible to forecast more than 10 days out, like the positioning of the TPV, the exact height of the western ridge, and the interplay between shortwaves
  18. brooklynwx99
    a favorable pattern does not guarantee favorable results. it just increases the odds. how many times does this need to be said? it's so disingenuous to imply that those that forecasted a favorable pattern were wrong. that's BS I was not wrong when I, and many others, said that the pattern would be favorable. it was, and we got fucked. that's all there is to say, and it's frustrating
  19. brooklynwx99
    "kicking the can" implies that nothing has changed. there was, in fact, a wholesale change in the pattern at the start of the month. this is 18 days of a favorable pattern... saying that the mid to late December didn't change is also completely disingenuous we rely on luck a lot more than people would like to admit, and our luck has been in the toilet. the ship will get righted at some point
  20. brooklynwx99
    nobody is arguing that the pattern beforehand didn't suck. why are you being a dick for no reason?
  21. brooklynwx99
    regression to the mean sucks. what else can you say
  22. brooklynwx99
    it was a 10 day stretch. if you told me that NYC, HFD, and BOS combined would get 1" from this, I would not believe you
  23. brooklynwx99
    we got our favorable pattern, sorry it didn't produce a blizzard over your house
  24. brooklynwx99
    yeah, i think it’s more like Feb 10-Mar 10 instead of Feb 1-Mar 1. i get that it’s frustrating and perhaps even annoying to see stuff get pushed back, but it is what it is the nice thing is that you can still get big storms in that window quite easily. 1958 comes to mind
  25. brooklynwx99
    this January was very atypical lmao it was like -10 in the northern Plains and Northwest
×
×
  • Create New...