Jump to content

Typhoon Tip

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    41,932
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Typhoon Tip

  1. back in 2011 July, I remember it was 96 at 11:58 as I was driving E bound on Rt 9 between Westborough and Framingham.
  2. Dp is definitely shucking off a tad compared to yesterday ...at least around here.
  3. yeah, I'm aware of that.. that's why I'm also specifying that it may not match
  4. I guess we all did then. Unusually pure blue
  5. Not sure if this conforms with Plymouth ^ but here's NWS' for 10am at Logan Jun 24, 10:00 am 93 70 47 99 W 12 10.00 30.00 30.02
  6. The gradient is so flaccid it's just local variability, sensitive to discrete warming variance in the micro meteorological analysis - most likely .. Btw, there is a prefrontal "trough" .. sort of I've been a little suspect of WPC's surface synopsis in the past, particularly with respect to these non-descript boundaries that occur here. But this was their last product dissemination
  7. Is American great again, yet ?
  8. This could be a good day for Scott to win the T contest. Nice WNW drifting of Boston's metro-west industrial farts
  9. Also, Plymouth has FIT at 87 ... that doesn't match the Meso/Utah product, but I'm not sure if there's some rounding convention differences either. I mean 88 ... 87 who cares, just noticed it - NWS: Jun 24, 9:00 am 88 70
  10. Logan extrapolates to 102 ... It's 91 there now, and they're likely to click up one by 10 am - would fit the '10 after 10' fwiw
  11. we'll have to watch out for all this cloud contamination getting in the way, huh -
  12. KFIT has 12 min to come up with 2 F to make 90 by 9 88 may be within error threshold anyway, just sayn'
  13. It is harsh on the body, no question. I don't know if "cheering" is the right word. I mean sure... there's always someone, but for most, it's the novelty of witnessing an extraordinary event. We nick 100 F on our big heat days, with enough frequency to numb us to the significance of 1-0-0. But getting a possibility for every site to be 101 to 104? mm that is definitely novel enough to the area to take note. It's a special anomaly ... it seems there may be an "air" ( pun hopefully annoying haha) of synergistic heat bomb about this, too. There are several factors that are likely to propel this into the "rogue wave" territory - the New England version of it, today. One observation of note ... there was a peculiar temperature rise of 2 to 3 F at several home sites around the area, which took place at 2am, after we had settled off to 74-ish. Back up to 77... this happened well before the light rose during the bowls of deep dark night. And it continued to rise decimals per 5 minute click off through dawn. Now, 90 and 91s are common at 8:30. This is how synergy manifests. I don't believe the models are seeing these idiosyncratic positive feed-backs... Anyway, human curiosity takes over. There's also a ton of scientific significance to novel scenarios. But imho, I don't think the average observer of this is wantonly cheering on a injury - and if they are, they should be guided to jumping off the cliff first as their poetic justice.
  14. wondering if this is at last a synergistic heat today -
  15. yeah, this is a recurring ob elsewhere even inland. this is a strangely anomalous territory scenario -
  16. I have several home sites within a mile of me all 87 or 88 as of 7:45 am... never seen this while living here, and not sure I have ever at all living along 42 N between the lower Lakes and SNE over the years.
  17. That's an impressively elevated low for that region of the interior.
  18. 86 now .. jesus. Forget 90 by 9, we're at least in the ballpark of 90 by 8
  19. 7:30 AM T 84 me thinks we don't have a problem making 100 considering it was 99 for high here yesterday, and we're still in the same predicament air mass, but today has the advantage of a loftier head start.
  20. 100's popping up all over in between the K sites at NWS
×
×
  • Create New...