Typhoon Tip

This is an interesting article over at Phys.org, https://phys.org/news/2024-04-atmospheric-teleconnections-sustain-blobs-northeast.html This is statement is concerning, "...The fundamental problem is that warmer waters hold less carbon dioxide and offer fewer nutrients for the plants and animals that exist there..." On the other hand, science has shown that the oceans in general "absorb 25 percent of carbon dioxide emissions and captures 90 percent of the excess heat generated by these emissions" - https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/ocean. ( I've read this in countless other direct sources of peer reviewed/publications) If (then) warmer oceans hold less carbon dioxide, and we are seeing the oceans warming at a non-linear increase ( the future will test whether that is temporary...), that should infer a -d(absorption) capacity. See ? this is how 'run-away' green-house warming begins.

Just in an intuitive sort of consideration ... it's almost humorous. It took this planet a half a billion years and more to create and stow all of these highly volatile 'fossil fuels.' Humanity, with their genius innovation, arrive on the scene "needing" to liberate that volatility ... back into a reactive environment, just since the IR. 500,000,000 years going in ... Since the Industrial Revolution, ~ 0.000045% of the same amount of time going the other way. How can that happen without consequence.

At a minimum requirement for recovering temp today the mid and high level cloud levels need to pass off. Check ... But as that miasma slips off the area, it is exposing some of the densest low level strata there can be without actually being underwater. man The sun is very intense at this time of year though.

Hey... modestly entertaining to me. I consider you lucky all things considered. to each his own I suppose... Trying to brighten here. Temp surged from 51 to 58 when that happened. It really wants to be quite a bit milder than it is today, but clouds ftl

Also, the training convection .. VT/NH central zones is related to this BD. It's circumstance is causing the larger synoptic environmental warm pattern ( to wit, there's a ridge over eastern N/A mid latitudes that's really not receding very much ) to flow up and over the cool air mass E of western NE terrain... It then hits it's buoyancy sigma and boom. Is there any thunder with with that?

It's probably for the benefit of all mankind, either way. But ... I will not post in this thread, henceforth, until the phrase "severe weather season" is erased from the title -

It's 63 in KHFD at the moment... up 6 since 7 am. It's 51 KBED, up 1 since 7 am. Both locations are reporting full cloud coverage. Both sites also reporting N or NE, albeit very light, wind flow. High res vis imagery displays the entire pan-regional scale in inundated by canonical BD jamming, https://weather.cod.edu/satrad/?parms=subregional-New_England-02-24-1-100-1&checked=map&colorbar=undefined The deeper layer thermal profile would support temperatures similar to yesterday if crucial insolation were allowed to heat the lower levels. Scott and I noted this yesterday, the lighter wind field and so forth ...this is really going to come down to how much sun gets through. Obviously this more likely in CT than E. MA. We are just a week away from entrance into solar maximum, lasting ~ the next 91 days henceforth. It's not like some magical boundary where all the sudden it matters... Being this close already we're getting roasting sun - when it is allowed through. We've seen it be in the high 40s on July 4.

based on what the models had been suggesting, I'd take a 59 with partly sunny and run with it!

Actually the GFS was hugely improved ... but again, not sure we should trust this. Baby steps.... I think a lot of the sensible appeal will come down to how much cloud we have to contend with. Notice N Maine is warminger than Brian, regardless of these versions below. Probably owing to clouds and rains Also, the wind fields appear pretty COL like much of the time, with weak gradients in every direction, that may limit the ocean penetration to just Scott ( haha,j/k)

Not out of the woods yet though. Models are clearly having some issues with things.

Hey Kevin, the 12z Euro backed off on Wednesday a little. Has you near 70 instead of 55... Just trying to be fair ...and also, poke the hornets nest. lol

I fear this summer may theta-e stagnate like last year and be an 85/75er ... It'd be 'oh my god' cc's coming to get us above normal and all, yet it never touches 90. Which would be okay ... but 88/76, not sure I dig that

It's gonna fill in up here in an hour. That stuff over VT is advecting SE pretty fast. We'll cap around 75 here and than slowly deteriorate under mostly cloudy here this afternoon. Which is fine all things considered. Like I was saying to Scott, this isn't coming through like a low level bulldozer of cold behind it like BDs of tragic lore. This will turn ugly when the wind turns east tonight and we start packing ocean smellin' low tide air and strata clear to the Berkshires.

It's kind of interesting ( ...sort of haha) but this isn't coming through as a BD technically. After days of bitching and and whining about it, no less. Seriously, the fronts a N-door oriented boundary. It's settling S, too - not blasting through. It's really more of a BD as it turns SW for NJ later tomorrow or whenever. But because of this aspect our winds here up along RT poopy are so far more variable N. CAA depth isn't there. In fact, at 850 mb, the thermal layout only barely dents as all this shallow misery cuts underneath this week...etc. It probably sucks for you down there given your proximity to the ocean - obviously - compared to metro west boston and out beyond 495 etc, early on. It also doesn't hurt that the band of clouds associated with the front has sliding S and we're getting a lot of sun. 73

Actually though ... being more practical for a moment: I can too clearly recall those old days of the 1990s and only having a vaguer pre-cognizant awareness that these obtrusive corrections were coming. The GFS may be right with that 44 F at BED at 18z on Wednesday - I've seen it happen in the past at this time of year. So assuming it does, I can coherently remember that was seldom seen ahead of time by the modeling 20 years ago. The resolution and improvements are outstanding - as much as we complain about the general winters, and unfairly ( probably ) scapegoat the models for it.

Fwiw, it's 70 here already. 10 after 10 ...prooooobably doesn't apply today? heh. just a guess. Otherwise, we'd probably be 80 .. 82 degrees this afternoon. This is what the GFS was apparently designed for - to maximize the penetration misery of the 'back door' hahaha

The funny thing is ... of this list of malcontents you gave, the patterns actually did change from time to time. And were called ahead, successfully. That did not matter - that's the rub. Just sayn'

Yeah we all have our individual preferences ... Some are more honest and forthcoming about what those are, whether other people care to hear about it or not. LOL. Like me, I write about hating and despising all forms of these low level backward/negative temperature flows of BD circumstances, and feel pretty strongly that anyone who privately covets them and the opportunity to "lavish" in 43 at BED while it is 78 at EWR ... is probably internally dysfunctional on on some lever or another. To each is his/her own. I suspect the majority are in their right mind, though, and hate and despise BN temperatures at this time of year, too ... cuz', what I think should be is of most importance LOL. Bear in mind ... it's probably slate gray skies with hints of drizzle at times in those 40s and 50s while you are deciding if this region of the country is still worth it. It's not worth it to me any longer. I've outgrown the dystopian fantasy of big snows and dramatic winter storms in general. I didn't feel nearly as "lovelorn" by the bad ( on balance ... ) recent 8 years of winters. In fact, by the ends of September, as the days began to noticeably shorten, I began feel, 'oh man, really?' at the prospect of it. My other Met friends in their 40s and 50s have been expressing similar emotions. 'not sure I care anymore.' Life outside the child, perhaps. I think it's just a maturing thing. Once the mind inexorably extends beyond the framework of what one's own experiences are, opens up a lot more to be fascinated about ... Once that is triggered, stales the old. I mean we've got too many extraordinary unprecedented aspects that are coming over the proverbial horizon due to you-know-what, and the experience of "the global phenomenon" It has become matter of insularity, really, to remain.

Doesn't get much better than this ...

And I've never seen anyone obsessively attempt to sell non-objective reality like you, either. But..it's okay. We know your the class goof-ball and it's all fun.

questionable

Beat MOS by 3 and 5 deg respectively with our 73 here today. Yet watching the sun set on this splendor tomorrow evening will be like farewell to a fondest love.

I feel like the models are negotiating how we're gonna get screwed .. with BDs on this day, no that day ... no, we mean this day game every couple of runs. Instead of just not screwing us. Get it? like, one way or the other, you're getting screwed? Technically there's a ridge over eastern N/A mid latitudes, but these heat crippling nuances keep getting sent down stream along 50 N.

It looks at 500 mb like a warm ( relative to season..) time of it Mon-Wed but nuanced details in the flow are teaming up to crumble and compact it S such that it won't get NE of NYC. Hasn't verified yet of course but being April .. heh. Just pick a 2-m temp product and loop it and you can see this walling off is persistent right through the period. Obviously ...being 70 at all isn't terrible, no .. .but we're not part of the cool kids. Lol. Plus, some models like the GFS have a day in the 40s into NE zones while it's over 70 at EWR. The basal pattern is coherently different in the models beyond that though. We're not likely to see these deep radiator nights in that look. Cool will come from back packing E Canada/Maritime air, with lows actually modestly above normal after afternoons around 55 ...should BD air mass violation occur. But when the sun shines and the wind were ever to turn around ... you're 70 pretty fast. The 850 mb general thermal layout has seen the last of sub 0C S of border latitudes ( in general) without any means to really bring that back, both in what's left of telecon statistics ( fading for the season ) and in the ensemble mean spatial synoptics. It should be seasonal to modestly AN for 10 days beginning tomorrow. Which frankly is a relative win for those of us that truly hate and despise 29 F mornings after probationary afternoon "warmth"'s phony sense of liberation from winter. On a personal note... on Nov 3 I'm gung ho for any symbolic gesture the weather can muster to signify the impending season. Diametrically opposed to that now. But no one ask.