Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    77,840
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by weatherwiz

  1. Even if we saw discrete ahead of the main line or stuff develop mid-afternoon I don’t think they do much. There just isn’t enough support. If CAPE was much higher sure...that could be enough perhaps but lack of a trigger and neutral to rising heights isn’t going to cut it.
  2. What the hell is with some people’s obsession in comparing the SPC risk area from 5/15/18 to tomorrow???? Like WTF??? Who gives a shit how similar the areas look...wtf does that have to do with anything??? Absolutely fooking ridiculous.
  3. The 18z looked like garbage. Outside of some scattered pockets of wind damage and some hail I think most will be crying bust tomorrow night b/c they had way too high expectations.
  4. I'm thinking 7-11 I agree these things usually speed up on timing but in those instance we have a pre-frontal trough driving the convection.
  5. faster timing? Don't think the faster timing idea happens. This convection is all actually looking to be associated with the cold front itself. Which is actually a little...uncommon (maybe not the right word) but don't even see much of a pre-frontal trough signal which is what usually sparks off the convection anyways. The cold front doesn't come close to us until late evening. We are going to see weakening llvl lapse rates due to loss of heating and the overall look to me doesn't really scream enough wind damage for the enhanced risk.
  6. that's going to be the exact area to watch...relatively small area too. That's where the greatest and really only tornado potential exists I think. I do think though the enhanced either gets removed or trimmed significantly...all of CT removed, a large part of MA, and even trimmed from VT/NH and bring the slight down to where the enhanced is in those areas.
  7. Twitter is absolute trash. People bringing up 5/15/18 to tomorrow b/c it’s the same day. THEY SHOULDN’T BE MENTIONED IN THE SAME SENTENCE. They are nowhere near the same type of setup...not even close. Who gives a fook if it’s the same day. Stupid stupid stupid
  8. Well they fall when the front approaches but yeah lapse rates aren’t anything to sneeze at
  9. A MURDER HORNET JUST FLEW IN MY CAR...I’m going to die
  10. The HRRR is on the fast train regarding timing.
  11. I a little surprised by the enhanced really...not sure I see wind damage being that widespread...kinda hard to get really good widespread wind damage with rather steep llvl lapse rates
  12. Gotcha. Well if we can get dews around 65 that will at least help boost instability given lapse rates won't be too great.
  13. Sort of advecting in from the OV? That might be what I was overlooking...source region
  14. No EML. Lapse rates will be ehhh. yeah those dews aren't happening lol
  15. The HRRR would be borderline localized tornado outbreak but yeah that looks strange to me as well. It does develop some pretty high CAPE with not much of a cap so perhaps that's the reason? But I just don't see enough support (trigger) for that scenario. The HRRR also seems to have a bias with WF supercells
  16. I wonder if the instability is overdone. Soundings from the 3km NAM show pretty steep mid-level lapse rates which may be overdone.
  17. SW VT/extreme NW MA could be a really good spot for something but I think the best ingredients are going to go to waste...don't see much of a trigger to generate convection during the afternoon...or at least enough support for deep enough convection to utilize the dynamics aloft. Going to be ugly on the cold side of the front...rain and 50's...yuck
  18. well my friend and I officially cancelled our trip to OK the end of the month...though we knew this a while back. Guess I'll just have to chase tornadoes around CT.
  19. Do you really think we see dewpoints in the 63-65F range? There is model support for it but I am struggling to find any evidence that happens. I can see 61-62 happening. Also, I see some on social media going sounding happy and this is something I've noticed and not sure if there is some type of issue with generating soundings but some of the soundings (SHARPpy) people are tossing around have rather high lapse rates and dewpoints and thus throwing out some big CAPE values.
  20. Should be enough instability left to keep potential for some damaging wind gusts.
×
×
  • Create New...