@ORH_wxman when looking at the PDO, what would you say is the best way of classifying a true positive vs. true negative episode and trying to classify a stronger vs. weaker event? I know a lot of folks use the raw numbers, but as has been discussed before using raw numbers alone can be extremely misleading.
I'm thinking of doing something like a true positive (negative) (and stronger episode) is when you have higher(lower) anomalies both within the western PAC and off the west coast.
If there is an episode where only one of these conditions are met, it's considered a "weaker episode.
For example, if we look at 1902-1903 the raw PDO numbers are as follows for the following months:
August: 1.81
September: 0.89
October: 1.11
November: 0.74
The ASON average comes out to be 1.14
Looking at that alone you would think that's a pretty solid +PDO, but the SSTAs I think tell a different story. I would not necessarily classify this as a +PDO as you're really lacking the warmer waters off the western United States coast and it would seem to be the PDO number is being inflated by the anomalously cool waters in the western Pacific.
Rolling into the DJFM period, the values are
December: 0.44
January: -0.04
February: 0.10
March: -0.19
DJFM: 0.08
This is certainly more reflective of a nearly neutral PDO (or very weakly positive) which the SSTA configuration would merely reflect: