Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    79,891
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by weatherwiz

  1. Cancelling Lee. Have a boundary already about to go through there. Hoping that boundary will spark up stuff as it moves southeast. That cluster west of VT going to peter out
  2. Gotta remember...setups which contain steep mid-level lapse rates need to be treated differently. If we didn't have steep lapse rates, the smoke negating any convection would certainly become a larger factor as we would need to be much more reliant of strong sfc heating to help boost CAPE.
  3. Lee is about a 50-minute drive from here so going to head there in a few and just see what happens.
  4. I don't think the smoke is a huge hinder. At least per mesoanalysis, there doesn't appear to be any CIN and our instability is the result of the steep lapse rates. Surface temperatures are into the 70's which is enough to have MLCAPE between 500-1000 J/KG. If anything, the lower dewpoints are the bigger hinder, at least for more scattered-to-numerous development.
  5. this isolated crap makes it difficult to figure out where to go. That SVR looks decent, but is likely to fizzle once it becomes outflow dominant.
  6. Yeah it's been back and forth for several days on this. I am really hoping we can get some decent convective threats my last week of vacation.
  7. Pretty textbook inverted-v tectbook profiles. Even crazier off to our Southwest. Pretty crazy to see a critical fire risk in the Northeast/mid-Atlantic due to dry thunderstorms and concerns for lightning strikes outside of convection to potentially spark fires.
  8. Shear is on the meh side, but lapse rates 7-7.5 C/KM! Mesos have been a bit more on the aggressive side too with scattered development. May not take much for cells to produce small hail.
  9. Wild https://atmos.northernvermont.edu/weather-data/lyndon-mesonet/green-mountain-aerie-rochester-vt-webcam/?fbclid=IwAR0ZS2EFa8M7sOJvaUKUOzN0raDE21jBG0c5R9LVVdMcZ8bjkNaEZz5HvLA
  10. Certainly will not help with getting any good heating, but luckily our instability is a product of the steep lapse rates and not totally dependent on heating.
  11. Might be pretty early too...could see stuff forming by like 11 AM which would hinder instability a bit. Not that there is much room to generate a ton of CAPE given low sfc temps/dewpoints but with steep lapse rates it doesn't take much to get 1250-1500 MLCAPE with enough heating and dews even in the 50's.
  12. Really praying Tuesday can pan out for some cold pool storms. I'm hoping we can get golf balls so one can hit me in the head and just knock me out until next summer.
  13. ehhh I would prefer another 10-15F to work outside. I was going to do some painting outside but my hands would get cold. I'll do some painting tomorrow. I'm not worried about any showers b/c what I'm painting isn't exposed.
  14. This weather SUCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
  15. Drizzle here THIS IS *********. I'm sick and tired of this seasons not acting in seasons crap. ITS JUNE. It should be 93/73 with TCU's popping by 11:00 AM. SCREW THIS
  16. This is brutal...absolutely brutal. Would have been a great night to watch the Stanley Cup
  17. Yeah we’ll have to see how the models really handle the lower levels as we get closer. At least bulk shear looks decent as do lapse rates so if we can not get screwed with a stable sfc we’ll have stuff to work with. Initially thinking any Convective chances may be tied to higher terrain but we’ll see
×
×
  • Create New...