psuhoffman

@CAPE @Stormchaserchuck1 I would be thrilled if we got a run like Feb-Mar 2015. There were two storms in there I consider big. One in Feb and one in March. But I think 2014 and 2015 are awful examples of something to root for. I’ve called them fools gold. 2014 Dec to early Feb there was a lot of ridging over the top of the nao domain but because a strong. Tpv got trapped under it the pattern mimicked a -nao. We also had a perfect pacific that held for months which is just unlikely in a -pdo. March 2014 and Feb-March 2015 was a bad example because a tpv got displaced into Quebec. Extremely anomalously SE. and that also mimicked the suppression of a -nao 50/50 configuration. But in 75 years of records that I looked at of snowstorm after snowstorm there are barely any other examples of that. The fact those were our most recent cold snow Winters I think creates the bias that those are a viable long wave pattern to root for. History suggests they were flukes with very specific and rare details that made them work. imo it’s unlikely we will ever see that again in our life. Not saying we won’t ever see a epo pna driven snowstorm. But it’s unlikely we ever see a winter where that pattern leads to repeated hits and a seasonal win.

Since I can already hear the groaning when I say legit big snow I don’t mean hecs 20” storms. But what I mean is a legit amplified wave that drops 6” plus over a larger region wide area. Not some progressive wave that has a significant snow zone of 3 miles wide and even if we get lucky enough for it to how our area many will still be left unhappy. I’m talking about storms like…all 3 of the 1987 storms, the Jan 1988 storm. The late Dec 1990 storm. The early Feb 95 storm. Several 96 storms other than the blizzard. The Jan 2000 storm. Early Dec 2002 early Feb 2003 late Feb 2003 after the blizzard. Jan 2004. The back to back late Feb early March 2005 storms. Feb 2006. March 2009. The two storms right before snoemageddon in 2010. Jan 2011…. Storms that have a BIG areal coverage of snow because they tracked at us from the SW amplifying but were resisted by blocked confluence. That’s how we get a real wide win.

Thanks captain obvious. But a +nao isn’t exactly working either. Baltimore hasn’t had a 6” storm in 8 years! So assuming I want a BIG snowstorm and not just try to get lucky with more progressive waves..what do I want? With a +nao unless we get incredibly lucky with a well timed tpv rotation over the top there is nothing to suppress and prevent an amplified wave coming at us from the TN valley which is our big snow track. The only way we snow anymore is when we just get super lucky to have some progressive boundary wave take a perfect track by pure luck. What look to we want to give us a good chance for a legit Big snowstorm if you’re rooting against a -nao? What other mechanism can work?

Never mind

You’re arguing semantics. You were upset the epo was fading but it wasn’t a helpful epo was my point.

Not a pro but imo it depends how the mlk weekend likely cutter system evolves. If the TPV all dumps east suppression. If too much dumps west cutter. Ideal would be a split where 75% comes east but it hangs some back to later swing under and become an amplified threat.

Even if the block dies completely around Jan 20 I think it’s temporary. If the epo ridge does migrate to Siberia it will force the TPV there up over the pole. That could temporarily cause a +AO/NAO. But as the mjo gets into 6-7 it will re establish the canonical Nino pac which will also likely vacate the tpv again given how weak it and the coupled SPV are. I don’t think we go positive and get stuck there. Even if we did if the pac ridge gets established we can rock 2003 style and aim stj waves at us with lots of cold around. February still looks on track to me. Everyone knows I’ll say when I decide it doesn’t. I think he is worried about the setup after. We do want more of the trough to slide east when it elongates or splits. We don’t want the stronger piece dumping west. That could set up another cutter.

I don’t think the stronger epo ridge on the euro is a coincidence. @Stormchaserchuck1 this is what I was talking about yesterday. Historically that epo should be good. But lately the more that ridge pumps instead of the downstream trough spreading east it digs more SW in response. It’s happened over and over and over. If that’s true we’re better off with the flatter gfs ridge there.

Gefs is old tech. That’s my story.

That’s perfect. You see the handoff happening around day 12. That’s a big dog setup.

I fear that first wave after the likely mlk cutter is probably suppressed. It’s not 100% but that’s a really suppressive look in general and it would take a really significant SW imo to work. Or for the look up top to relax which can happen but we’re discussing how they look now now how they might look later. (I haven’t looked at anything yet today). I was looking at how both set up what imo could be our best shot before some kind of relax/reload of the whole pattern. That might be just beyond where the ensembles end as the tpv in the 50/50 relaxes. I’m slightly troubled that the block is fading so fast. But that could be error. We want the block to relax but it needs to hold somewhat until the flow becomes less suppressive after the cutter that finally pulls the trough east. I thought last nights gefs run set up that period better. It also was set up better for the wave in the 15-20 period imo so it was just better imo. But eps wasn’t bad. Just slightly off on some important details which will change some anyways and could become what we need easy.

Coastal explosion

I agree with Heisys analysis of the 0z eps. It wasn’t what we want. There is a reason almost none of the members had snow near us or even south of us. They had amazing agreement and most progressed the way he laid out. But that doesn’t mean it’s right. It’s day 10 stuff and gfs geps were better. EPS prior runs were better. It could flip back today. But that one run in a vacuum wasn’t good. It was very close. But the key part to watch is when the TPV elongated or splits as most guidance hints after the cutters, we need the eastern extension of the trough to be deeper than whatever hangs back or dumps west. Remember when I said the lower heights in the 50/50 space are key. If you look at all the examples of our -pna wins what they all have in common is the heights to our northeast are lower than the heights in the west! The gefs of course just dumps 90% of the energy east and pops a western ridge. That’s better but actually could be too suppressive given the retrograding block and monster 50/50. Here’s the good news. That leaves us needing a compromise between the two as a best case and that’s actually historically the most likely solution. I know years ago ncep used to go with a 60/40 compromise between the eps gefs to draw up their long range guidance.

@Terpeast Maybe if we’re really lucky we can get a 10 day pattern like this so we can get a few more perfect track rainstorms

Not much based on my cam

I approve where the death band is

Last 8 years

As long as it amplifies and pulls the trough east in its wake we win either way. It sets up the next wave. Stj will keep em coming.

I’ll take a poodle puppy at this point

Sometimes we get a 1-2” pity event. But no we don’t often go from 12 to 5” and that’s because we don’t often get moderateevents anymore. It’s all or nothing so unless we get fringed like some in that early Jan 22 storm it’s big or go home.

As long as you let them score 10 for my parley

I’m holding. Not saying I’m not getting a little nervous. But I have a sneaky suspicion either things line up for a typical Nino run at some point and we hit my forecast or it doesn’t and we don’t get even close.

His methods are fine but his stubbornness to incorporate them with more modern technology enhanced strategies is the issue. The best use both! I disagree. I saw several people commenting from 120 hours out that we were in trouble knowing what was likely the final 100 hours. The globals from range struggle with mid level warm layers. Blocking is the one exception when the southerly flow can be suppressed. But otherwise once we get inside 72-100 hours we ALWAYS discover the mid levels will warm more and the snow area shifts north. So assuming you applied basic model adjustment 101 I feel like they did great.

I doubt thats the one. I’ll just be happy of it can stay far enough south that I have options to drive to snow with the kids to ski MLK weekend. If Killington VT can stay snow I’d be thrilled. That’s where I’m at with that wave. I do like our chances after provided one of these cutters can knock down the war.