psuhoffman

OMFG this is legendary.

The main moving parts are the ridge over Quebec and 50/50 (strength of both) and the timing and strength of the pacific energy ejecting. EPS and AIFS had the most favorable look 12z of the options imo but it’s all still on the table until guidance settles on those features and as of now they’re bounding around every run.

Thank you for answering the question “what if there was another Chuck, but who didn’t know anything and was even more annoyingly repetitive”. Im not sure who was asking that question but thanks for answering anyways.

The ai models aren’t meant for those details. Nothing is at this range frankly

No but thanks for trying

Deer sh!t covered. Mission accomplished

6-10” DC to PA line 3-6” south of DC another 40 miles

I also wasn’t accounting for the timing difference. I was seeing the 50/50 retreating sooner but not factoring the wave was coming faster this run. They evened out.

Never mind NS SW dives across the top and saves the day. What do I know. Horrific analysis. Randy so sorry. I’m out.

weaker 50/50 stronger wave probably means rain this run

You know…I was up in central PA during 2 previous winters with somewhat similar pattern and arctic cold and I was super dry for a month while down here was getting all the snow. The snow rides the boundary in thaw regimes and we ended up too far into the cold to get those cold boundary waves but not far enough north to get the pure arctic boundary waves. We have been in a dead zone.

You 150k people

26 light snow. Driveway caved

I’d be down with that. Remember the old classroom thread. That was a lot of fun because it was all legit stuff no clown maps