Jump to content

Stormchaserchuck1

NO ACCESS TO PR/OT
  • Posts

    3,296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stormchaserchuck1

  1. Wetter than average/-NAO December's evolves into +NAO February's Drier than average/+NAO December's evolves into -NAO February's 75 years of basis.. pretty cool correlation there. The Feb NAO signal> Dec NAO(pick and choose) *wetter/drier than average across the US Strong -PNA December's = -PNA/+NAO February's at 0.68 correlation Strong +PNA December's = +PNA/-NAO February's at 0.70 correlation
  2. We actually have some pretty big pressure hitting the coast of Alaska today, and it's so warm out.. feels like 50. If the -PNA/+NAO that these LR models are showing verifies it will be 60s/70s ^look how this is kind of a 180*/from today, and it's still so warm out. Pressure breaching the N. Pacific is definitely a staple of this time. (I still think there is a +PNA signal 2nd week of February, will be interesting to see how this evolves.)
  3. And the same February pattern is repeating as the last 4 years (as per current models). Mathematical odds of 5 strong -PNA's is actually pretty low.
  4. Feels like 50s today.. I can always tell when the PNA changes. (-PNA, had been +PNA a lot of the Winter)
  5. It's actually been a wet Winter so far If we get cold, I think we can get some snow (PNA-NAO have been correlated and when the Pacific is good, I fear NAO could be positive). Also 2/13 -NAO in December have all time been wetter than average, like we have seen this year. If you use counter-analogs (+NAO/dry December) we get a large composite that has a stronger +NAO February signal than -NAO strength in December (which I picked and chose analogs from!) Pretty incredible correlation there. No one would probably guess that this has been a shutout (-AO/NAO) v (reminds me a lot of 97-98)
  6. I think LR models have a La Nina bias, and are weighing this too heavily: result
  7. I'm actually waiting for my posts to be approved.. Climatology shows that a strong subsurface warm pool right now leads strong NIno's such as '82 and '97. I think in a larger range of year you would have different results, I think we are going into El Nino, but maybe Weak or Moderate. (It could go strong, and have the N. Pacific have a base -PDO state, such as 72-73.)
  8. Here you go guys.. flex that SE ridge (84hr 00z NAM vs 90hr 18z GFS)
  9. His board? I love weather. Love obvious right's/wrong's and pointing them out as these are $$traded commodities. Feel like it's an awesome chance and time of peace.. 384hr gfs ensemble now has a -NAO trying to develop, and I nailed that +PNA Feb5th-> call, as of right now, verifying better and better, vs models at 18z. 384hr of the gfs ensemble looks good. I fear this +NAO pacing our coming +PNA. hopefully the modeled -NAO/+PNA happens in the 2nd week of February.
  10. I guess indexes, or index changes aren't considered by models? Weird, easy error. I've seen this verify before close to 100%. There you go! I'll look forward to 50s, and 60s and rooting on the snow drought into the 2nd week of February.
  11. re: 18z GFS: this model will trend much, much warmer in future runs for Medium Range Storm. -PNA, nasty +NAO. could be 60s is my guess.
  12. DCA +5.5 NYC+6.0 BOS +6.5 ORD+5.5 ATL+5.0 IAH +3.5 DEN +1.0 PHX -2.0 SEA -3.0 *Edit 1-31-2023 7pm.
  13. eh.. it's phasing into this I don't like the threat anymore. Just for cold rain. By a lot actually, (Just like PHL covering -2.5)
  14. That's a pretty horrible look on the 6z GFS ensemble. After this 72hr storm, it's warm, warm.
  15. That's actually a lot of moisture running into cold air.. my guess would be ice in future runs. +PNA signal starts Feb 5th.. will probably coincide with +NAO
  16. I found no STJ correlation but there was a strong PNA correlation at 0-time.. fwiw
  17. Subsurface in Nino 4 is about 10F above normal.. 65 degrees, not 55 degrees. I've found that the subsurface is more important regards to actual N. Pacific pattern in 0-time (D+0). (You can also look at the pressure pattern that happened in Winter 87-88, in reverse, when the subsurface was total cold (<-5F) During El Nino (SouthUS-High Pressure)(as the best analog match).)
  18. Now we have really strong +NAO in February I was surprised because the roll forward composite (+NAO) was greater than my pick-and-choose analogs
  19. Man.. can someone approve my posts? Not really worth it to post on this board anymore. Also because WXUSAF doesn't like to approve posts that have real $$value in forecasting.
×
×
  • Create New...