Jump to content

78Blizzard

Members
  • Posts

    3,693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 78Blizzard

  1. BOX has been burnt too many times in the past. They figure to start low, and can always raise them as we get closer, lol.
  2. I'm thinking the opposite, that watches will be extended for many coastal areas.
  3. Based on that BOX map, they are riding their own private model.
  4. LOL. Half the forum is praying for the Canadian solutions, and half for the GFS and NAM.
  5. I noticed that at 18z Tuesday, the NAM, CMC, and RGEM all have temps here at 33-34 with winds out of the north, whereas the GFS and UK have temps at 37-39 with winds still strong out of the northeast. That and the UK showing the 925 0°C line further north than those other models.
  6. That is one of the most reasonable snow maps I've seen in days. Funny it's from the CMC run.
  7. Once we got to 18z and after, the winds began turning into the N bringing down the colder air to our north. Still some colder temps around despite the warmer air at the beginning.
  8. At least it cut way down those insane QPF amounts from 18z. Still not great for BOS metro, but an improvement.
  9. This obviously won't happen, but it would be funny if the system chased that convection out to the east and slipped away with minimal impacts. The meltdowns would be epic.
  10. The one positive on the NAM is that it didn't take the 925 0°C line into southern NH as did the 18z Euro. In fact, the line didn't make it past the CT, RI, SE mass border.
  11. That's a little colder solution than 12z, but still a mess for many places.
  12. My point about ignoring the GFS is for the period up to 8pm Tuesday, which, as I said, showed anywhere from 7-19" for ORH. The map obviously didn't reflect that scenario, or gave it short shrift.
  13. ? How does that relate to what I said? I knew that based on my comment.
  14. The GFS 18z run had 4" for WOR after 8pm Tuesday. But through 8pm it had anywhere from 7-19" depending on that insane cutoff. So they must be ignoring the GFS scenario.
  15. Despite the mess, still not a bad outcome in the end here.
  16. It just goes to show that even with the technological improvements and super computers over the years, we still have a long way to go in weather modeling. I'm surprised that NCEP or whoever is in charge didn't request recon flights for this system, given the uncertain nature and the likelihood of coastal flooding and wind damage.
  17. The GFS couldn't even get it right on 1 day out just last week.
×
×
  • Create New...