Jump to content

Chicago916

Members
  • Posts

    336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chicago916

  1. I want whatever this experimental Canadian model is smoking.
  2. I feel that. Today's theme is just minor adjustments everywhere tbh. Still could see a surprise since I think some of the features are still up in the Arctic.
  3. Was just thinking about all the budget cuts to the NOAA and how it impacts modeling. I wonder what verification scores are now vs previous years (winter and summer comparisons). Feels like modeling is pretty bad.
  4. So you're saying now until the start of the system it won't continue to baby step better, upping snow totals each new run (jk but I really miss those days)
  5. Unsurprisingly the GEFS went boom They should just decommission that model...
  6. Sampling of the Baja low not included in the NAM (doesn't matter cuz it sucks anyways) but good for other models. So that won't explain any changes seen down there. Looks like some sondes made the NAM after all https://x.com/i/status/2014131199120162993
  7. End result on the EPS looks similar, so wouldn't look too much into that
  8. When the measly ICON is northwest, bombs away
  9. Sounds like the Baja Low will be sampled for tonight's 0z runs, so we should have that answer then.
  10. At 15-1 to 20-1 ratios, I think Chicago gets 20in+ with that run. Certified big dog potential. Everyone's eyes peeled to the Euro soon.
  11. Um guys. The latest UKIE... Hard to ignore that. 500mb is just crazy. (Ninja'd cuz didn't even see the random lake effect this model loves to always wrongly include)
  12. I say we give this the ol no hitter treatment for now.
  13. Recon missions with better sampling too will be super meaningful. Regardless of outcome here, very interesting set-up. The South will get demolished regardless.
  14. Soooo. We realistically are still too north for the weekend system right? Kinda seems like a northern feature has sped up and is now phasing with the ejected cutoff and pumping up the SE ridge enough to just about get precipitation up this way? Would love an expert's opinion here lol
  15. Comparing the GFS to all other models for this upcoming storm might be the worst gap I've ever seen. We really need to retire it and invest more into our modeling here ... Oof. Unless it wins a coup and is correct but doubt it.
  16. As much as I somehow want the weekend storm to trend positively up this way, I'd rather BAM be wrong. I guess we'll see.
  17. Shame it's forecasted to be cloudy and dangerously cold since there's a great northern lights opportunity tonight.
  18. Yeah. It's the 2nd worst verification score for medium range models I think. Definitely not believing it's output this model run, but I guess it does show probably the best outcome up here because I doubt anything can overcome high pressure as strong as what's progged.
  19. Verbatim, if something like the latest Canadian happens, wouldn't the thermodynamics for lake effect be nuclear given the Arctic air mass? Doubt that happens though but the timing of the cold air could allow for that.
  20. For those that know, the Ragu programmatic ad at the bottom of Pivotalweather will be the death of me.
  21. Wednesday/Thursday clipper uptrend. Or do we not care cuz it's not a big dog?
  22. "the week before Groundhogs day IV storm" thread. Too soon for it though. That would be a ton of ice given the cold air mass prior.
  23. Definitely not zzzzz. Next week looks interesting for sure. High potential. (Peaks at latest gfs model lol is that a triple phaser?)
  24. Now if we can get another arctic impulse to perfectly hit at let's say Sunday at 7pm that would be great.
×
×
  • Create New...