Meh, these are non-hydrostatic models that are producing some of these really ugly solutions. I haven’t seen this from any of the globals yet.
NAM actually did tick slightly better from 18z. I know the rpm didn’t, but I’d want to see some higher end guidance before reading too much into it.
I like non-hydrostatic models in these types of storms once we are close in, but sometimes they can go haywire when over 36h out.