Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    90,902
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. The old SREFs made up of ETA and RSM models were actually half-decent synoptically. The newer stuff with ARW and NMB members are really good with short term convection but they go crazy synoptically. Just not their design.
  2. 18z GFS isn’t any better either. It still has that CF enhanced area and introduces a bit of PVA to maybe help out. But the main goods are still comfortably offshore unlike NAM and short range stuff.
  3. Only stretch on record where ORH managed 3 winters of 100”+ in 4 seasons. (We came close to repeating that between 2000-01 and 2004-05 when we did 3 out of 5)
  4. We develop a defacto west based -NAO though shortly after Xmas, so I wouldn't be shocked to see some blocky/wacky solutions between now and then. Here's today's Euro between D8-11....you can see all those higher heights up in Canada expanding into the NAO domain....its not your classic NAO ridge back building from the Atlantic, but it may still offer some chances for storms provided the colder airmass gets trapped a bit underneath it
  5. Good luck....I'd prob go a C-1" there....leaning toward C at the moment.
  6. Yeah that looks mostly like white rain....maybe if you got above 1200 or 1500 feet it would be better, but that's not what you want to see for accumulations.
  7. Euro wasn't any help at 12z....it is showing that IVT band from NY moving east during the morning on Saturday though, as some other guidance was showing, so might be a period of light snow for a chunk of SNE from that.
  8. GEM has the event too...decent snow on Xmas Eve and overnight into Xmas morning.
  9. If this CF sets up with a bit of easterly flow over the top, it might do that from your area to mine....I could see 2-4" happening. The problem is the setup is delicate, so just assume it won't work out until we're closer....but it's a plausible scenario....and yes, a derivative of fraud five, but once in a while they throw you a bone.
  10. Yeah I thought it looked better than 6z GFS regardless of sfc low position. I still think this is mostly a tease though...it won't ever get close enough.
  11. 850 temps are like -9C too....so I think we'd have decent low level snow growth if we can get that light easterly flow over the top of the sfc front. This type of setup isn't super common, but we see it occasionally. You can get a surprise 1-3" on the cold side of the front. I remember we had a similar thing happen on 12/15/95 prior to an IVT system that set up later that night....during the day, we had this easterly flow that dropped a couple inches to the west of Boston. Then everyone got a few more inches from the IVT that night as the boundary slide ESE.
  12. There's definitely a CF that sets up prior to any coastal approaching the area....RGEM and 3k NAM are kind of similar with it....right over 128 or thereabouts. You can see the onshore flow and then almost northerly or NNE flow on the other side of it with temps 6-8F colder. If things set up correctly, you can get a narrow band of enhanced snow with a few inches on the cold side.... SE MA wants the main CCB to back into their area...if that happened, they would flash to heavy paste.
  13. It's that shortwave in the southern stream....so I think it's real. But if it verifies weaker, then we have a chance at something bigger.
  14. RGEM was pretty damned close too...actually has decent snowfall in E MA, but not sure I buy it as the main CCB is still a bit east. Almost like a little CF enhanced area from onshore flow.
  15. Dec '73 had almost 10 inches of QPF at ORH with 0.9 inches of snow....that's about as bad as it gets. It wasn't that cold, but it wasn't a full-on torch either. Just a bit AN....that would usually produce plenty of snow in that.
×
×
  • Create New...