Jump to content

baltosquid

Members
  • Posts

    536
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by baltosquid

  1. Takes "Diurnal initialization sensitivity", puts in pocket for future coping.
  2. Unfortunately RGEM held the vort back more this time as well. Could be a downer 12z when the Euro comes in but hey maybe if the GFS is so good now, it could be keying in on something Sunday to cheer us up!
  3. Nam isn't too far away, things just happen too late. Definitely moving in the right direction. Still too far southeast for most of us, 95ish probably would have been furthest NW extent of flakes or just too far to get anything, but hopefully the start of a trend.
  4. If we're blending, things look quite good. But I am giving some serious stink eye to those EPS members that go up the bay. Don't need another trend into a Harrisburg hauler! BUT if that did come to pass, it seems like the track would support longer snowfall before any changeover, and it seems less likely this would ride all the way up to western NY and would rather eventually scoot off the coast, so maybe that nets us a snow, rain, snow event. Standard terms and conditions with back end snow apply, all purchases final.
  5. Is there any reason this system would prevent/reduce the likelihood of the second? I don't know enough about how this would interact. Does it become a spacing issue if there's too much energy in the first one or something? Or just superstition?
  6. Tracking frontal systems with brief rain before similarly brief back end snow just feels like watching whiffs in the making, but I would take some mood flakes during the work day all the same. Even if the best case is 1 inch, that should stick around given there's a chance we don't crack 30 degrees for a couple of days afterwards!
  7. Unsalted surfaces caved pretty much immediately in Canton a few hours ago, but now salted surfaces are also turning white. Seems like there's another hour or two before the mixing hits. Hoping that yellow on the radar reaches up here! Looks like there's around or a bit under an inch right now but I don't have an actual measurement.
  8. Oh, those halcyon days when we were fretting a southern slider. Well, 2/3 ain't so bad. Just fun tracking now, in a tragic sort of way lol.
  9. I don’t think we get shafted quite as badly as the NAM shows but 18z could definitely be the set of runs that crystallizes this as a 3 inch ceiling for the 95 corridor. Seemed liked 3-6 wasn’t out of the question but that diving NS is not going to have it. Gotta make peace with that. Oh, and don’t forget urban heat island effects…
  10. CMC and Euro demonstrate once again, as has been mentioned by smart folks, unless the NS backs off last minute there is not much influence to be had over the ultimate fate of the storm through other factors. That phasing is just so strong. Both models had significant jumps East with the h5 low for the first 72 hours and it really only marginally affected the storm track in the end. Even with what looks like a very nicely timed neutral tilt (could even be considered late, compared to last Monday) we can’t buy much time west of the low along 95. Just have to hope that piece is overdone.
  11. Not convinced the SE jump will help us at hour 72. Looks stronger, more neutral and cutoff. Might have a harsh left turn like the CMC, but would be glad to whiff on that thought.
  12. There is a low in the south next Wednesday on GEFS but there’s no impetus for it to really develop and come up our way. Just gets bullied off the continent. But it’s there. Maybe it finds a path northward.
  13. Lol never mind. Did not lighten up on that at all, phasing happens fast and swings the thing way west. Low never even gets east of DC.
  14. FWIW, CMC h5 early on is a good chunk SE/faster. Would do a lot for my optimism for a good metro thump if a model that’s been so stubbornly gung-ho about Hagerstown-Harrisburg as of late lightens up on that a bit.
  15. GEFS really clustering the lows just SW of OBX at 84, so pretty much the same as 06z but higher confidence. The h5 look is stronger and a little slower though so I think it’s gonna be an adjustment W/NW. Not horrible or anything, just looks to continue emphasizing that any fully offshore path is either out the window or just about climbing out. Still room for a track east of the bay though.
  16. The flow in front of the low on h5 just looks like it’s so S/N oriented that the storm is still locked in for a hard turn n/nw.
  17. Well the spacing between the ocean low and our storm seems to keep getting smaller, for what it’s worth. So far, at least.
  18. I’m surprised they brought the impact all the way down to the minimum for the I95 corridor. I know to an extent it’s relative and they only have three levels of impact, each of which is taken by areas deserving of the higher impact warnings, but idk, if a warning level snowfall and some sleet too is still on the table for the corridor then that seems like an odd choice. edit: I guess if impacts are mostly happening Sunday evening it makes more sense
  19. Looks like EPS is either about the same or very marginally east, but wider spread. Certainly got back some members taking the coast track. But overall still too far inland on the mean to be comforting. edit: later frames look more like taking the path over Philly rather than Harrisburg on the mean which is nicer, so that’s good to see.
  20. That's the big thing, focusing on track and tunnel visioning on the chances that the low either ends up east of the bay or in Cleveland is foolhardy. Take away 1-3 degrees in the lower parts of the column for as little as a couple hours and suddenly everyone west of the bay is looking at a potential warning or better level event. That's a good event, especially with what looks like a good pattern for the rest of January. We don't need a blizzard, just juice the thump and avoid the slop by getting put in the dry slot once we torch and this will be nice.
  21. RGEM is interesting. A good bit faster/further east with the mid level stuff but also much stronger. Cuts off earlier than would be preferred. Not smart enough to extrapolate that out to game time, but my rough guess is not an earth shattering improvement.
  22. At 84 on h5, looks like the ocean low is stronger and further West while the main event is in about the same spot and a tad weaker. Seems like it’s gonna be similar or maybe slightly better for us?
  23. The whole thing is just getting slower, slower, slower. It keeps backing up run over run into the energy behind it. Spacing is too much in front and becoming too little behind. Nothing has broken that trend. Hard to see it doing so at this stage but there’s always “the wave isn’t on shore yet” to fall back on I guess, for a little longer.
×
×
  • Create New...