Jump to content

Wetbulbs88

Members
  • Posts

    1,386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wetbulbs88

  1. Yeah I figured it didn’t just go away. Those bands are incredibly thin relatively speaking.
  2. Oof this is just...a blinding glimpse into your joyful world.
  3. I’m dictating into my phone.I’m dictating into my phone.
  4. Well I’m an idiot I see now. What are the curved lines then?Well I’m an idiot I see now. What are the curved lines then?
  5. Is it just me or has lake affect calm down in recent years? I remember when buffalo got like 7 feet of snow once.Is it just me or has lake affect calm down in recent years? I remember when buffalo got like 7 feet of snow once.
  6. So I think I’m reading this wrong. Because I’m looking at the line as it curves and it bends way warmer than 0° before it falls to the ground. How are you supposed to actually read it? Edit: I don’t know why but when I dictate these replies it pays a duplicate.Currently smoking a cigarette in my attic window like a teenager.
  7. Maybe I’m not reading it right but the temp seems to spike between 600-700. And pretty big time too. So it just stays all snow despite that warm layer? Or what am I doing wrong?
  8. Yeah you might be right. This is my first full winter here. This winter it’s been pretty identical.
  9. Sure and the globals can still step back from where they are. I’m not wrong. It’s not the same solution. But it does give us a much better chance so hopefully it does continue to move that way. I’m just not very confident.
  10. You could be absolutely right. I just think this is a very difficult setup and the models tend not to get the—very important—specifics right till close to game time. And if anything will do that faster it’s the NAM along with other mesos. People are conveniently tossing the RGEM as well too. As I said I hope I’m wrong and I’m just bitter at this point. But I think ice is still a better bet and it’ll be tough to ward off upper level warmth.
  11. Yeah honestly everyone is saying the NAM caved. It didn’t. Caving would’ve been a similar solution and this is not a similar solution. You can say I’m arguing semantics but I made my call earlier. I think the NAM will end up being closer to the result.
  12. Tbh despite the fact that you’re right, it barely makes a tangible difference. The fall line has to cut RIGHT across DC for it to make a real difference.
  13. I am 100% against a thread until as late as possible. I don't care if it's superstitious. I'm willing to try anything at this point.
  14. The off runs are brutal Is this actually a thing? Why would off runs be any different?
  15. Honestly this looks beautiful. If it's all frozen I really won't complain. Hopefully the thump holds on a little longer. It happens often, those things are VERY difficult to time via modeling.
  16. Huh? His area is nothing like other parts of the region. How can you say it's 'no different'. That makes no sense at all.
  17. Haha I'm so bitter man. I feel for you. I grew up in Ellicott City, lived in Seattle for a two years (where I actually got lucky with a couple storms), then was absolutely blessed to live in Yonkers and Harlem for six years total. I can honestly say that Ellicott City is closer to New York than DC. Like, it's not even close. This is miserable.
  18. Yeah I was joking. I'm just really salty so anything below 6" is just not going to really get me going. Been robbed pretty much every storm except for the first January one and even that was pretty meh for a warning event.
  19. RGEM is there too though. Not quite as much but nothing like the globals.
  20. Couldn't agree more. And the NAM has been hot this year. And the NAM--as I'm saying now for the upteenth time--is NOT a bad model.
×
×
  • Create New...