This may be a bit of banter, but whatever. I love the amazing job of analysis on here by several different people. That’s why so many of us spend much of the day reading this forum. Obviously this Science isn’t an exact Science or Mets would be able to accurately predict the temperature and amount of rain or snow on a daily basis. I interpret for a living (American Sign Language). Interpreters are notorious for judging other interpreters because they would have done it differently. But often there are MANY correct interpretations based on the input! Basically everyone on here is interpreting the computer patterns, NAO, and 500 mb charts, etc., based on one’s perspective. And some people will judge and criticize because they see things differently or just don’t like the input that the computer models give out. I know that a lot of people have skin in the game because they predicted a snowy winter, but Weather will do what it wants, no matter what we want. All of that to say... I really appreciate the variety of analysis and opportunity to learn from some really talented people. I will continue to be optimistic that we will have a snowy February, regardless of the long range because we have generally overperformed pretty well. And we really only need a really good pattern set up for a short time to give us something like Jan ‘16.