I think 2020-21 also fits this example, although less so than the examples you listed.
2005-06 was meh, but we did have a December storm and the... "HECS" in February. 40" in NYC.
a banding situation in both cases? is this also why NYC only saw a trace that May even though there was thundersnow?
I wonder what the temperature differences were in that storm too, NYC vs PVD vs BOS?
Are we sure that wasn't an erroneous situation? I have a hard time picturing Providence getting 7 inches in May lol. How could that happen when Boston had much less? Providence is almost always warmer.
It's probably why mild winters tend to stay mild even when the pattern becomes "better" later in the season.
You usually need that December snow and cold to make sure it comes back after any thaw later in the winter.
we usually do a little better than the city in events like this so in a 2-4 range, it would be Central Park getting 2 and we would get 3, or 3 and 4... this is just going by memory of past events like this.
This is what I think too, that will just keep the current pattern in place. Truthfully, it's hard to think of what would actually cause a big change to the Pacific if a +2.0C very strong el nino couldn't do it after three years of la nina.
Winter storm naming isn't unscientific, it's done in Europe. It's the silly names they pick that I don't like. Winter storm naming can be tied to areal coverage of winter storm warnings for objectivity
There is a scientific way to name winter storms, I just don't like the silly names they use.
We can tie winter storm naming to areal coverage of winter storm warnings, that's the most objective way to do it.
Thanks, I've been looking for storm by storm details of some of the elusive winters that dumped 100" of snow in NYC and PHL I believe there was one in the late 1830s and another one in the 1840s with continuous snow cover from November through March.