Jump to content

EastonSN+

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,108

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by EastonSN+

  1. EastonSN+
    Anything for BDR? They need to avoid the record.
  2. EastonSN+
    We can agree to disagree so we do not clog the thread.
  3. EastonSN+
    I will let a red taggers explain in more detail but you have to look at more than the surface.
  4. EastonSN+
    Yes it would.
  5. EastonSN+
    Yes much colder. It's not just the surface.
  6. EastonSN+
    We always have this one to look forward too LOL Obviously the only model showing this BUT the air mass is much colder at this time. The way this year has gone it will be suppressed like the GFS is showing. Sorry if this belongs in the March thread.
  7. EastonSN+
    TWC has me all rain.
  8. EastonSN+
    I need this track for coastal CT (yeah I know showing 1888 and such).
  9. EastonSN+
    Yeah it's definitely been a major dud. Possibly least snowy of all time! Happy it's almost behind us.
  10. EastonSN+
    This is the track needed for LI and NYC. This storm does it north and over land. Obviously just showing track 1888 was wayyyyyyy more intense.
  11. EastonSN+
    What stinks is if this deepened stalled and looped like 1888, 1978 this would have been 15 plus for CPK and LI. It all happens too late
  12. EastonSN+
    Nope since 2015 we expect it.
  13. EastonSN+
    NYC, LI and coastal NJ will be tough, however like you mentioned intensifying a bit further south and closer and the aforementioned locations can get accumulating snow. Massive massive potential for 84.
  14. EastonSN+
    Somehow it still crushes SE Mass with over a foot.
  15. EastonSN+
    Wow 9 to 15 for us south CT coasties!
  16. EastonSN+
  17. EastonSN+
    Seems like the EURO has a much larger precip shield. GFS is tight
  18. EastonSN+
    Lol. Figured it had to show this sooner or later.
  19. EastonSN+
    But, if the modeling moves east, won't the western crowd now bail?
  20. EastonSN+
    Congrats highlands
  21. EastonSN+
    GFS seems to be moving the low along a lot faster too (maybe a later capture).
  22. EastonSN+
    That's cause January acted like an El Nino. The December and February (with the latest storms and records) was a west displaced la Nina trough. It just happens that California went from one pattern to another that hit them hard. Like in 95/96 where each pattern alternation we went into happened to work out for us. The same is happening this year for them.
  23. EastonSN+
    El Nino looks like this. It's a positive PNA undercut by a strong PAC. A la Nina is the opposite with a trough.
  24. EastonSN+
    That was January only. December February and March had a deep trough over California allowing the storms to move South and the cold air to drain. Please take a look.
  25. EastonSN+
    Take a look at the trough positioning. You will see why California had all this precipitation. It's still a west coast trough displaced west of the Rockies. That is la Nina.
×
×
  • Create New...