TSG

Whats you're system size (AC and DC)? Curious about specific yield

Getting dunked on in Hooville. Very ominous looking sky Gust to 51 at CHO

Has anyone seen any recent research or discussion related to the AMOC slowing down and it potentially being part of what we're seeing happen in the tropics? An interesting concurrent piece of data is the arctic is so far having its best year in terms of ice cover since ~2013 despite the record global temps last year. April specifically ended up only 16th lowest overall and the highest for the month since 2012.

We've had plenty of pleasant weather, but not much of it has been in the 48 hrs we care about most every week.

I cursed us. I'm sorry.

I'm confused why people keep saying tonight we get another chance. I thought midday UTC today was the last pass of a significant CME?

Absolutely bananas.. looking NW from Ravens Roost near Wintergreen.

You could think about heading this way. West of Cville is looking okay for early tonight if you trust the 3k NAM. I'm planning to head up to Skyline or the BR Parkway around 9pm.

DCA: 98 IAD: 101 BWI: 99 RIC: 101

You crunching those numbers in Excel or is there a webpage that let's you create those tables? Two thoughts: 1. Recency Bias. Yeah this would be a warm April pre turn of the century, but look at how many of the last 25 years are ahead of this year at DCA. #1, #2, and #7 are all in the last 7 years! That's what people remember, especially last year. 2. I'd be interested to see the average High / Low for the montth compared to normal. Avg temp only tells part of the story. A gloomy, cloudier than normal spring may have near average temperatures because of lower highs and higher lows. That doesn't mean it'll feel "warm"

Odd night in Albemarle. CHO hit 39 by 1am, but then the wind kicked up and we were at 45 at 3:15. Managed 36 before sunrise after the wind died off again.

Water temp in that part of the river is in the low/mid 60s right now, an East wind is the culprit.

Backdoor cold fronts and gloom through June 1

lol

Yeah we were close! I was just a bit further south at one of the overlooks on Cherohala Skyway

It's what we do best. Embrace it.

I'll be amazed (and maybe ready for the sweet kiss of death lol) if I make it to the 2090s. I guess modern/future medicine should make 90+ a more enjoyable existence down the road, but idk if it's something I'd want to experience today

Thinking about how old I'll be for that one was an odd feeling. 52...

I would say yes, but my two viewing locations couldn't have been more different so hard to be sure. 2017 was on the side of a mountain in Eastern TN. This year was on Hope Memorial Bridge in downtown Cleveland. Way more artificial light this time around, but it felt about the same, and the 360 degree sunset effect seemed more pronounced.

Not to be a bummer but anything short of totality just isn't worth making the trip. That 0.3% makes it a completely different experience. I would recommend finding a spot within the path you can drive to without hitting too many major roads.

I saw a rough timeline posted somewhere yesterday, from what I remember: - short term goal is to clear the channel enough for one-way traffic in 3-6 weeks. - Two-way traffic coming a month or more past that once they've pulled the ship back to port - ~6 months for full cleanup of the bridge structure

ahh yeah definitely referencing my experience in VA with that last statement. When I was working on projects in DC they had similar stormwater requirements. Want a great example of horribly written legislation? In DC, 50% of total rooftop solar panel area counts towards the "green area ratio" requirement on new/re-development. A majority of the reason that bill was enacted was to improve the water holding ability of the local landscape. Solar panels definitely do not retain water

Oooo a topic I know well! I'll keep this short, I know it's off topic. The pervious vs impervious debate on solar panels has been happening in many states and the legislation typically falls well short of common sense... like a lot of things these days. My view as an engineer is they shouldn't be considered completely one or the other except for very specific cases. On a typical ground mount installation, the only truly blocked off portions of the ground are where foundations enter the ground/sit. The panels will of course redirect and concentrate rainfall a bit, but you have gaps between every panel where water can drip down to the ground below. Water running across the ground is also not prevented from entering the ground when running under panels. A more useful piece of legislation would take all this into account, but that would require doing more legwork to figure out. And lawmakers are lazy. So we get half-baked decisions like "totally impervious" or "totally pervious" when the truth lies somewhere in-between. Rooftop/garagetop solar won't affect stormwater calcs since they're going on top of already impervious surface.