40/70 Benchmark

Yea, I am not saying to buy that single OP run...obviously await ensemble consensus and then consistency, but that is a start. I think that is the right path. It just doesn't sit well with me that this season is a ratter.

Exactly.

Yes.

Its about wound up systems providing the impetus for mass heat flux to higher latitudes in order to facilitate a change to a more favorable pattern by raising heights up there. They also represent wave breaking events that can shift the pattern. The reason you don't hear about that with respect to blizzards near the BM is because we are usually already in a favorable pattern at that time.

If you are a weather fan in the east, the HR hooked foul lol

Its a perfectly valid point worthy of discussion, but it tends to get political and just derails weather threads.

Totally disregard that.....I misunderstood you. Completely my fault. I had already edited. Once it had actually worked out like that, yea....we got about what would be expected from that compressed flow.

Yea, if you know exactly how its going to pan out, then sure. Haha Obviously no one is capable of that at extended ranges.

Note to self. Discuss away in here.

Piss off. Take it to banter.

Is there a reason you only have 4 posts left today? Maybe you are feeling "lucky" and they'll make it 6...

Please keep that shit out of these threads.

What I am saying is that we likely would have had more snow even if the NAO block had occurred sooner OR later, and was less prominent as the RNA flex ensued...there would have been less deconstructive interference via the compressed flow. That is the chance element of this. Sure, it would have turned to rain for SNE, but there still would have been more snow than was measured in the shredded turds.

At the precise same time, yes.

It is aggravating hearing the phrase "January thaw' this season lol. Shit never froze-

Wherever there is probability, there is luck, but call it as you wish. More often than not, when you get an NAO block like that, we will not be totally skunked at this latitude.

No, that is a bad pattern. The couple of would be snowers that missed east were bad luck...as well as the timing of the NAO block relative to the RNA flex.

Until the cutter this weekend....lol

I know most won't take any solace in this, but I do fall back on a small two-fold consolation. I know @Typhoon Tipoften refers to the "dopamine drip" effect in that we impulsively crave the fulfillment of our need for snowfall and model cinema due to a psychological dependence. I think periods like this ultimately act to reduce that to a degree...kind of like a snowfall addict's detox in that its initially the rehab is tremendously painful, but you eventually end up better for it and develop a greater proclivity toward delayed gratification. This also recalibrates our perception and replenishes our enjoyment of the larger, more memorable events that may have seemingly become more ordinary in this age of hyperactivity. Secondly, its also a penance of sorts for having overindulged much of the past couple of decades in that we are now settling the score with the regression gods to a degree...I know I have personally for the past several years, and the larger scale region has as well, albeit to a lesser degree than my specific quadrant of the region.

Yea, pretty similar in the snow department, despite the pattern not being as horrendous.

Classic Fraud Five.

The polar domain has been much different than that year....heights IVOF AK haven't been as consistently cratered, either.

Depends how much less....I mean, we were well over 100" that season....I am talking more like 60-80", which would be in no way unlucky.

I think a lot of us are just exhausted by it...I know I am.

I would take that a step further and virtually guarantee a similar look would yield much less snowfall