Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    72,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. My concern is also precip type if the mid levels don't get going. But I would be careful with this clown maps. I agree elevation helps.
  2. If you were allowed to post anymore today, you could explain why you are so woefully misguided.
  3. I have news for you...models do not print out physically implausible solutions. Don't waste any more of your 5 disputing this fact, dude.
  4. Its day 10, but not like this is one of those weekly product charts cooked up in George's basement meth-lab....this is on the radar, folks.
  5. Perfectly stated. Same thing goes for last week, despite the synoptic failure.
  6. @CoastalWxWIll be offering clinics on nuanced thinking...perhaps a few guest speaking engagements, as well.
  7. Well, if anything even remotely resembling the 12z GFS ever did verify, then you probably wouldn't mind the 5PPD restriction nearly as much for about a month or 3.
  8. Yea, same page...I'm suprisingly confident in my forecast for most of the area despite the inconsistency amongst guidance. I understand adjustments are needed south...sure.
  9. I honestly trust the NAM here more than the RGEM. I get that there is confluence, but its also a southern stream system....how the RGEM manages to cut the precip at KLWM, yet still have it warm enough for rain across most of the region is beyond me. I know this isn't a SWFE, but I still generally trust the NAM to sniff out warm layers. Now, if you want to tell me the QPF is overdone by a third on the NAM, sure...okay.
  10. I would be more concerned seeing that as a slot within the main QPF field....that just looks like we're on the N edge of the QPF shield, which is where you usually want to be.
  11. That looks odd...doesn't seem like the Maine dry drain... Some of the EPS memebers were doing that yesterday.
×
×
  • Create New...