Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,448
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Snowman92
    Newest Member
    Snowman92
    Joined

January 2026 regional war/obs/disco thread


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Yeah there’s been some bombs for sure. Fast flow and not allowing for amplification only applies here. :lol: 

Been trying to say this for a long while. That’s all you need to see(bombs everywhere else ) to know that idea(Hadley cell and fast flow) is complete BS.   It’s just random bad ju ju…and that’s it. At some point it will change, like it did for us through the 2000’s and 2010’s, when pretty much 90% of all SW’s came together for us no matter what. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

The ongoing PNA- will eventually end, even if the 0z GEFS sustains it through its forecast period. Once that happens, recent historical experience (since 1980) suggests that the PNA will likely undergo a regime change to mainly positive values.

image.png.0b16416280a62ebf29de7c476b52b218.png

The same kind of regime change took place for all 10 25-day or longer streaks that began in November or December.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Getting perilously close to the point at which I can just about guarantee an unprecedented 8th consecutive dud-winter for MBY.

I think you have a ways to go on that part imo…December 30th isn’t that time frame yet. At 1/30 you may be in trouble though…good thing that is still 4weeks away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Getting perilously close to the point at which I can just about guarantee an unprecedented 8th consecutive dud-winter for MBY.

Its December 30

Way too early for that.

  • Like 4
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a very real shot of not much at all heading into like January 10th....I'm not a mathematician, but I have 8" now...carry the one, tie the noose.... then take a look at years with that kind of total headed into mid January and it's non-negotiable.

It's easy to bury your head in a pillow, click your heels together, and blindly state it's too early....until you actually look at the numbers, good forbid if you can bring yourself to be objective,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

You need to take a look at climo with single-digits snowfall into January....

I think you need to take it easy…and take a deep breath. Stick to your guns/your outlook, and let’s see how this unfolds? Long long way to go bro.  Something’s gonna pop, bet on it.  
 

 Not For one minute do I believe the modeling has the upper air pattern right for something 8-10 days out. So there will certainly be changes.  You know this. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWolf said:

I think you need to take it easy…and take a deep breath. Stick to your guns/your outlook, and let’s see how this unfolds? Long long way to go bro.  Something’s gonna pop, bet on it.  
 

 Not For one minute do I believe the modeling has the upper air pattern right for something 8-10 days out. So there will certainly be changes.  You know this. 

That is what it is...I don't change anything. But the numbers don't lie if it doesn't snow soon. Keep in mind I am speaking strictly about the seasonal total...this doesn't mean that there won't bee good storms at all from here on out and/or it will be warm. Not at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Looks like a very real shot of not much at all heading into like January 10th....I'm not a mathematician, but I have 8" now...carry the one, tie the noose.... then take a look at years with that kind of total headed into mid January and it's non-negotiable.

Everything in meteorology is negotiable…because it’s the future, and because it’s not an exact science. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

That is what it is...I don't change anything. But the numbers don't lie if it doesn't snow soon. Keep in mind I am speaking strictly about the seasonal total...this doesn't mean that there won't bee good storms at all from here on out and/or it will be warm. Not at all.

I think you are conflating what I am saying, JD.

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

That isn't meteorology, it simply climatology and arithmetic.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has that feeling of an old fashioned winter that we had growing up in the 70’s. The kind that started early in Nov/ early Dec and by the time you hit Morch you felt like it had been a year since you felt warmth . They used to be constantly cold like this . With no warmth in sight thru Jan.. it really has that vibe.  Hopefully the snow follows 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Been trying to say this for a long while. That’s all you need to see(bombs everywhere else ) to know that idea(Hadley cell and fast flow) is complete BS.   It’s just random bad ju ju…and that’s it. At some point it will change, like it did for us through the 2000’s and 2010’s, when pretty much 90% of all SW’s came together for us no matter what. 

Actually that would be incorrect. Fast flow doesn't necessarily inhibit storms from bombing out nor does changes in the size and structure of the Hadley Cell. They just influence the jet stream differently and shift around regions which are favorable for deep cyclogenesis. A faster flow makes it more likely for storms to bomb out farther to our west versus towards the coast and then for storms to bomb out as they move just off the coast towards Atlantic Canada. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

Actually that would be incorrect. Fast flow doesn't necessarily inhibit storms from bombing out nor does changes in the size and structure of the Hadley Cell. They just influence the jet stream differently and shift around regions which are favorable for deep cyclogenesis. A faster flow makes it more likely for storms to bomb out farther to our west versus towards the coast and then for storms to bomb out as they move just off the coast towards Atlantic Canada. 

I think it's still dependent on the trough axis, Paul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

That is what it is...I don't change anything. But the numbers don't lie if it doesn't snow soon. Keep in mind I am speaking strictly about the seasonal total...this doesn't mean that there won't bee good storms at all from here on out and/or it will be warm. Not at all.

Ok, I’m not saying your seasonal total ideas aren’t going to be wrong…but the weather obviously doesn’t care about totals and stats…so I guess my point is at some point things will snap the other way.  When that is, is anybody’s guess?  
 

But If D. Sutherland is on to something, that would certainly help some.  I just don’t see the angst on 12/30.  But I also just picked up close to 9” too…so sometimes that helps  the outlook too.  
 

I guess if you want to be upset, then go right ahead. I feel January will have some fun in store for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Actually that would be incorrect. Fast flow doesn't necessarily inhibit storms from bombing out nor does changes in the size and structure of the Hadley Cell. They just influence the jet stream differently and shift around regions which are favorable for deep cyclogenesis. A faster flow makes it more likely for storms to bomb out farther to our west versus towards the coast and then for storms to bomb out as they move just off the coast towards Atlantic Canada. 

Don’t talk to me, talk to Tip bro. 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWolf said:

Ok, I’m not saying your seasonal total ideas aren’t going to be wrong…but the weather obviously doesn’t care about totals and stats…so I guess my point is at some point things will snap the other way.  When that is, is anybody’s guess?  
 

But If D. Sutherland is on to something, that would certainly help some.  I just don’t see the angst on 12/30.  But I also just picked up close to 9” too…so sometimes that helps  the outlook too.  
 

I guess if you want to be upset, then go right ahead. I feel January will have some fun in store for us. 

Okay, sure...yes. I agree....slow start doesn't prohibit a good stretch, which I still expect, regardless. I am just referring to the ultimate seasonal total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I don't see why a faster flow is more likely to place the trough axis unfavorably for the east coast relative to any other area of the globe.

It's not like it's just applicable to our area though, the concept would apply to other areas of the globe too. For us it's just a product of where we reside regionally. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

It's not like it's just applicable to our area though, the concept would apply to other areas of the globe too. For us it's just a product of where we reside regionally. 

Explain to me like I am 5 years old why a fast flow makes favorable tracks for the midwest and Maritimes more likely than the east coast...the west warm pool, I understand....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Okay, sure...yes. I agree....slow start doesn't prohibit a good stretch, which I still expect, regardless. I am just referring to the ultimate seasonal total.

Ok bud…I see your point. It’s all good. I guess I was trying to lift your spirits some with that reasoning.   You know your stuff…hoping we can all have some fun as we are just starting to walk in the door of our climatological wheelhouse.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWolf said:

Ok bud…I see your point. It’s all good. I guess I was trying to lift your spirits some with that reasoning.   You know your stuff…hoping we can all have some fun as we are just starting to walk in the door of our climatological wheelhouse.   

I was just hoping for at least some virtual excitement by this point, and all I am left with is a clipper that will produced a mini CJ as the dong drops on my grape on NYE.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

It's not like it's just applicable to our area though, the concept would apply to other areas of the globe too. For us it's just a product of where we reside regionally. 

And where we are at the moment too.  Because the bombs Paul…they aren’t being affected by this idea in other parts of this country currently.  Just like they weren’t being affected here during the 2000’s and 2010’s. But other parts of the country at that time were struggling, but we weren’t. So that tells me, that again, it’s a cycle.  And we will come out of it, like we did after the last dearth where nothing(very little) worked out here(the 80’s). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...