Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,400
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SouthOaklandCtyWX
    Newest Member
    SouthOaklandCtyWX
    Joined

December 2025 Short/Medium Range Forecast Thread


John1122
 Share

Recommended Posts

The 12z Euro (it hasn't run on WeatherBell...but has on pIvotal) gets rid of the infinite feedback loop and kicks a strong trough into the East and completely flips the d10-15 pattern.  Is it right?  No idea.  But I feel like I have seen this movie before....like about 2-3 weeks ago.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

Is that a different RMM1/RMM2 than CPC uses?  I noticed it is ABM generated.  I haven't seen the CPC site go into 6, and it is updated to the 11th.  Here is the CPC site's for today.  It never crosses into 6.  If they are different, I wonder which is more accurate.

42dce830-f354-4861-b4c9-9d70e9c60e68.png

Now, back to model feedback, and the 12z GFS was EXTREME with it today.  I figured that if was noticing at 500, the surface had to be crazy.  This is a comparison of the AIFS and GFS at 12z.  Notice anything?  This is how we know that we are dealing with model feedback, OR the ski slopes in the Sierra Nevada are about to get buried(not without precedent BTW).



 

 

From what I understand, the ABM one there is the actual verified MJO plot, and that there's a 3 day lag time for it per Gawx. I believe the GFS there is likely a model estimate. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John1122 said:

From what I understand, the ABM one there is the actual verified MJO plot, and that there's a 3 day lag time for it per Gawx. I believe the GFS there is likely a model estimate. 

I "think" the black line is the observed index.  The black line is the same on the Euro.  The starting points for the model are the 11th.  Prior to that I "think" is observed.  It is possible the CPC site corrects that later?  I haven't really watched to see if they change it, but I don't think they do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carvers Gap said:

I "think" the black line is the observed index.  The black line is the same on the Euro.  The starting points for the model are the 11th.  Prior to that I "think" is observed.  It is possible the CPC site corrects that later?  I haven't really watched to see if they change it, but I don't think they do.

This was his quote about it. I could be wrong as you two know much more about it than me.

 

Quote

There’s been an ~3 day lag time in getting the official MJO phase/amp. As it turns out, the initial phase 8 lasted only 5 days (12/3-7) as it went into phase 6 on 12/8 (per 1st image), which was totally unexpected. I’ll keep following this closely to see if it re-enters phase 8, which I think has a very good chance but we’ll see.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

The 12z Euro slides a 1052 hp into the Plains late in its run.  Wild swing.  I will post some graphics when my stuff updates.

And that phrase that we’ve heard on college game day not so fast, my friend.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, John1122 said:

This was his quote about it. I could be wrong as you two know much more about it than me.

 

 

I will be interested to see if CPC updates their official plot.  I honestly don't know if they derive their own plot or get it from ABM.  I haven't ever thought about it.  Thank you for clarification on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matthew70 said:

And that phrase that we’ve heard on college game day not so fast, my friend.  

We saw this EXACT thing happen already in this short winter.  I referenced my erroneous Nov 21st post yesterday(which caused some confusion).  Let's see if the Euro stays with that solution.  But the 12z Euro is a great example of what happens when things don't stall or feedback over the Pac NW.  I have little doubt the GFS is having trouble in that region, but I don't remember it having feedback issues w/ troughs there.  It does have some issues with building up cold air masses in the Canadian Rockies front range and then not kicking it out.  But w/ the comparison I had above w/ the snowfall amounts vs AIFS, the GFS is an outlier at this time.  Now, it can snow out there big time, but it really is out on a limb.  When the trough doesn't stall there, it "should" kick out which it did on the Euro.

The bad thing about that possible error is that it absolutely wrecks LR ext (weeklies) until it gets fixed.  

And if we are looking at 1055 HPs coming out of Canada, that would explain the models bouncing around.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not clipper, but interesting I think...The 12z Euro loses the infinite loop feedback over Pac NW.  We saw something similar w/ the repetitive and erroneous Baja lows earlier this month.  The 12z GFS got locked into a Pac low(maybe it is right?) complex, but the Euro kicked the trough eastward.  Take a look at the differences.  There is cold air drainage into the NA Prairies on the Euro.  Compare that to the GFS at the same hour.  Now to be fair, the GFS eventually kicks everything eastward.   I think anytime we see a standing ridge over the SE this winter, we are really going to have to question what is going on upstream.  Those ridges can happen and there is precedence.  But they have been mirages this winter.  I do think a Chinook is coming.  But until the PAC NW repetitive low situation gets resolved, everything after that is probably a crap shoot.

BTW, infinite loops have always interested me, mainly because they are a pain to programmers.  I had to take three programing classes at UT.  Infinite loops were challenging puzzles to solve, and sometimes a huge pain in the you know what.  

We really want to be routing for that 1050+ hp to continue to show up on modeling.  This could be a blip, but worth watching.  

048a05f7-677b-40d4-882a-2ee907c98ab5.png
b4cac2c0-3b86-4a3c-8a51-cc75ea670d56.png

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, jaxjagman said:

Euro the last couple runs has been showing signs of the Subtropical ridge moving out west,maybe its seeing something  the other models arent seeing right now,dunno.But right now it dont seem to have much if any support

Models-ECMWF-—-Pivotal-Weather-12-11-2025_01_43_PM.png

I think it is a really amplified pattern.  That is Arctic air under that ridge...1054 hp sliding down the Plains.  Deceptive look for sure.  Cold air is traveling close to the surface...some of the coldest air of the season under that ridge.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somewhere, Larry Cosgrove has to be smiling. The Euro Weeklies have a strong EPO by about Jan 17th.  

So, we need to weather the storm between Dec 20 and Jan 20.  It seems like the patterns this winter are not as stable as past winters, i.e. they are shorter in duration(4 weeks and not 6 weeks).  

If we can swing a cold air mass or two during that "warm" time frame, that would be awesome.  If we can find a way to go cold during that time frame, we have a shot at a cold winter.  We are all pulling for the 12z Euro to be a trend and not a blip.  It does actually have support from the 12z GFS which is just about 48 hours later w/ the trough pushing east.  But huge grains of salt at that range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a prime example of the ensemble mean being skewed by anomalous members.   I mentioned this yesterday.   A substantial number of members from the EPS(2 sets of panels) and the GEFS (1 panel), have a cold front coming through on Christmas or the day after.  The first group of thumbnails is from the GEFS at 366.  Most of those members have a cold front pushing through.  The EPS also has several members which produce cold.  Surprisingly, the 12z GEFS has more of colder solutions.  (I am pretty sure the GFS and GEFS were not updated at the same time.  That leads to some discontinuity between the two at times.)  This "could" be the first chink in the armor of the duration of the presumed, longer-duration warmup.  Time will tell.  In early December, the first signs that modeling was reverting...the oddball deterministic run which became more common and individual ensemble members.  

422ed1d9-88b2-43e2-87d4-4d503dac4fcc.png
b50a6518-2e0e-4e07-befc-78fa2de9cc78.png
4d7e439a-c467-46c5-8b0d-6041c82c16b0.png

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...