Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Central PA Fall 2018


pasnownut
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, maytownpawx said:

I told a few people at work yesterday it would be 52-45.They asked what I really thought and i said 52-45.

My wife said something the other day about going out to dinner Saturday night, my daughter said you'll be going by yourself, me and dad are watching the Penn State game :facepalm: i think i created a monster, i believe she watches and pays more attention to sports then i do.  

 

but like Canderson said, should be perfect weather at kickoff. 

i just saw they're calling for another 3/4" tonight into tomorrow morning for our area. After last night, i had standing water in my yard this morning. The ground is saturated. I see you in Lancaster County as well as a couple other southern counties are under a flood watch.  

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sauss06 said:

My wife said something the other day about going out to dinner Saturday night, my daughter said you'll be going by yourself, me and dad are watching the Penn State game :facepalm: i think i created a monster, i believe she watches and pays more attention to sports then i do.  

 

but like Canderson said, should be perfect weather at kickoff. 

i just saw they're calling for another 3/4" tonight into tomorrow morning for our area. After last night, i had standing water in my yard this morning. The ground is saturated. I see you in Lancaster County as well as a couple other southern counties are under a flood watch.  

 

 

 

 

#getabiggerboat

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see OSU ever having to punt. 


For the first time in decades(?) PSU has a dominant O-line in regards to its rushing attack. Combine that with the tank that is Miles Sanders plus the general ineptitude of PSU defense and PAU could do worse then attempting the “Army” strategy and just physically running it down OSU’s throat to try to control possession.

On defense if OSU is bound to score
All the time they might as try some exotic blind side blitzes to see how this new OSU QB reacts to unexpectedly eating grass and having the wind knocked out of him.

If by some miracle they actually have to punt at least PSU has Hamler leading the best special team return game they’ve had here in forever (ever?).


. Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jns2183 said:

 


For the first time in decades(?) PSU has a dominant O-line in regards to its rushing attack. Combine that with the tank that is Miles Sanders plus the general ineptitude of PSU defense and PAU could do worse then attempting the “Army” strategy and just physically running it down OSU’s throat to try to control possession.

On defense if OSU is bound to score
All the time they might as try some exotic blind side blitzes to see how this new OSU QB reacts to unexpectedly eating grass and having the wind knocked out of him.

If by some miracle they actually have to punt at least PSU has Hamler leading the best special team return game they’ve had here in forever (ever?).


. Pro

 

Agree with all of this. We need a big night from our special teams and we HAVE to win the turnover battle...those 2 things set all PSU's recent success into motion the last time the Buckeyes came calling to Happy Valley. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of 11:45 pm, Harrisburg had received 0.29" rain. That brought Harrisburg's total precipitation for 2018 to 50.00". That is only the 8th time on record that Harrisburg has received 50.00" or more precipitation. Seven of those cases have come after 1970. Four have come after 2000. The last such year was 2011 when an annual record of 73.73" precipitation fell. Records go back to 1888.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

As of 11:45 pm, Harrisburg had received 0.29" rain. That brought Harrisburg's total precipitation for 2018 to 50.00". That is only the 8th time on record that Harrisburg has received 50.00" or more precipitation. Seven of those cases have come after 1970. Four have come after 2000. The last such year was 2011 when an annual record of 73.73" precipitation fell. Records go back to 1888.

thanks Don

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

As of 11:45 pm, Harrisburg had received 0.29" rain. That brought Harrisburg's total precipitation for 2018 to 50.00". That is only the 8th time on record that Harrisburg has received 50.00" or more precipitation. Seven of those cases have come after 1970. Four have come after 2000. The last such year was 2011 when an annual record of 73.73" precipitation fell. Records go back to 1888.

Thanks, Don. Do you have the data to post the top 10 wettest years on record for KMDT? 

2011 was brutal because we had Lee and Irene back to back, plus a pretty good nor'easter that winter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, canderson said:

Thanks, Don. Do you have the data to post the top 10 wettest years on record for KMDT? 

2011 was brutal because we had Lee and Irene back to back, plus a pretty good nor'easter that winter. 

Here is the list of Harrisburg's 10 wettest years:

1. 73.73”, 2011
2. 59.27”, 1972
3. 57.07”, 1889
4. 54.63”, 2003
5. 54.22”, 1975
6. 53.34”, 2004
7. 52.43”, 1996
8. 50.38”, 2018*
9. 49.73”, 1937
10. 49.23”, 1945

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

As of 11:45 pm, Harrisburg had received 0.29" rain. That brought Harrisburg's total precipitation for 2018 to 50.00". That is only the 8th time on record that Harrisburg has received 50.00" or more precipitation. Seven of those cases have come after 1970. Four have come after 2000. The last such year was 2011 when an annual record of 73.73" precipitation fell. Records go back to 1888.

Thanks for checking in.  Dare i ask how the winters were in those 8 "wetter" years?    

Nut

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, pasnownut said:

Thanks for checking in.  Dare i ask how the winters were in those 8 "wetter" years?    

Nut

well, we know how 96 turned out :)

 

2003 was a good winter, i have 79.5" in my notes with a Miller B February 16/17

2004 i have 43" marked down

'11 was pretty ****ty

the other years i don't have in my journal 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sauss06 said:

well, we know how 96 turned out :)

 

2003 was a good winter, i have 79.5" in my notes with a Miller B February 16/17

2004 i have 43" marked down

'11 was pretty ****ty

the other years i don't have in my journal 

not too shabby.  2 outta 3 aint bad :)

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, sauss06 said:

well, we know how 96 turned out :)

 

2003 was a good winter, i have 79.5" in my notes with a Miller B February 16/17

2004 i have 43" marked down

'11 was pretty ****ty

the other years i don't have in my journal 

The January 96 storm is still my all-time favorite. 30" of cold powder that actually lasted for 12 days before the epic flood that wiped out the west span of the Market Street bridge...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pasnownut said:

Thanks for checking in.  Dare i ask how the winters were in those 8 "wetter" years?    

Nut

Seasonal snowfall for the following winters was as follows:

1889-90: 10.3”
1972-73: 13.3”
1975-76: 18.3”
1996-97: 22.8”
2003-04: 34.6”
2004-05: 27.9”
2011-12: 12.5”

Mean: 20.0”
Median: 18.3”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Seasonal snowfall for the following winters was as follows:

1889-90: 10.3”
1972-73: 13.3”
1975-76: 18.3”
1996-97: 22.8”
2003-04: 34.6”
2004-05: 27.9”
2011-12: 12.5”

Mean: 20.0”
Median: 18.3”

 

Thanks...I think.

Since your such a great stats guy.........can you pad them...a LOT!!

Ouch, but that was my worry.  Clouds wrung themselves out i guess. lol

In truth, it would be nice to see how those 10 winters looked like regarding major indicies (Enso etc) in relation to how we look as a low end Modoki Nino seems to be appearing more likely.  I'm hoping none of the above have a similar data set.

Appreciate the feedback.

Nut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...