Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

High End Severe Wx Possible Sat nite (6-11-16)


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

Yeah this was about as red flagged a slight risk day as you can get.

 

Meanwhile on Friday down in Philadelphia they had widespread severe wind damage and barely a peep out of SPC. You need to figure out where you can add value to their forecasts and the PHL example was a perfect case. No real outlook, a MD that says meh, yet 100k+ without power and millions of people getting 50 knot gusts. The forecast was a pretty easy one too down there.

 

Not a good week for SPC. We just had an Eastern Region science share about SPC outlooks in the Northeast.

 

Conclusion they are actually better locally than nationally when it comes to the critical scores of POD, FAR, and CSI. Color me surprised too.

 

What the results showed was that SPC generally does a good job with outlooked risks (Saturday notwithstanding). If they issue a slight or higher, something usually happens. More often an event overperforms (no outlook, something big happens). Of that subset of overperformers, most often those are NW flow events (versus W or SW). And typically overperformers are low shear. Intuitively I get that, it's hard for SPC to get a signal for severe weather in low shear. But we know those low amplitude waves can sometimes be our best producers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Not a good week for SPC. We just had an Eastern Region science share about SPC outlooks in the Northeast.

 

Conclusion they are actually better locally than nationally when it comes to the critical scores of POD, FAR, and CSI. Color me surprised too.

 

What the results showed was that SPC generally does a good job with outlooked risks (Saturday notwithstanding). If they issue a slight or higher, something usually happens. More often an event overperforms (no outlook, something big happens). Of that subset of overperformers, most often those are NW flow events (versus W or SW). And typically overperformers are low shear. Intuitively I get that, it's hard for SPC to get a signal for severe weather in low shear. But we know those low amplitude waves can sometimes be our best producers.

 

Interesting. 

 

The number of reports probably plays into the verification too. With the population density around here (and good spotter networks) we can get dozens of wind damage reports from 30 knot winds in the summer lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here I am pretending I'm 20 running around campus in ITH, when I finally realize I have a problem. 

 

I'm at a tent party with good beer (Southern Tier Tangier gets my approval) and good music, and I'm looping the HRRRX 36 hour forecast and radar over MI and already complaining that the writing is on the wall for that slight risk.

 

The first step is acknowledgment.

 

Here I am pretending I'm 20 running around campus in ITH, when I finally realize I have a problem. 

 

I'm at a tent party with good beer (Southern Tier Tangier gets my approval) and good music, and I'm looping the HRRRX 36 hour forecast and radar over MI and already complaining that the writing is on the wall for that slight risk.

 

The first step is acknowledgment.

Nice to know I'm not alone lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IDK why a slight was ever introduced into SNE.

I also wonder how much stock is put into models such as the 4km NAM...that hasn't been all that fantastic as of late. I use it more for storm mode than anything but it looked real intense for PA at least the day before and also last week when we had a setup out that way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. 

 

The number of reports probably plays into the verification too. With the population density around here (and good spotter networks) we can get dozens of wind damage reports from 30 knot winds in the summer lol. 

 

The nice part about this study it they normalized the "overperforming" events to account for increases and improvements in the spotter network in recent years.

 

So a significant Northeast event in 2011 required more reports than a significant event in 1989.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IDK why a slight was ever introduced into SNE.

I also wonder how much stock is put into models such as the 4km NAM...that hasn't been all that fantastic as of late. I use it more for storm mode than anything but it looked real intense for PA at least the day before and also last week when we had a setup out that way

 

The slight was there for a conditional threat. If we got the warm front to move, it would have been favorable for severe. If we got morning convection, severe was much less likely. You can even see SPC hanging onto slight risk for the morning stuff redeveloping late morning as it heats up.

 

This is an argument for SPC being a little more flexible with outlook updates. They are pretty locked into 1300z, 1630z, 2000z, etc. But if the forecast has changed and you are confident in that, pull the plug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...