Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,515
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    wigl5l6k
    Newest Member
    wigl5l6k
    Joined

Tropical Storm Cindy thread


Recommended Posts

45kt from ASCAT in a rain free portion, 1004mb pressure from a 1007.3mb report by a bouy north of the center, so numbers have a bit more backing now. This is with the discussion noting that the structure has not changed much since the first advisory. Would not be surprised if the post season analysis brings the initial development time back 12 or 18 hours with how the satellite had looked during the day before declaring, and more importantly these observations giving credit that the storm likely had been a tropical storm for some time before being declared as one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A disgrace to tropical cyclones everywhere.

Not even worth the kilobytes used to discuss it.

Meh...a 40 mph GOM slopical storm that can't get organized due to shear/dry air on western flank is more disgraceful.

This is a classic "bar pick up" storm -- looked great at night while drunk...you wake up the next morning and realize the true "beauty" beside you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it looks as though Cindy is wrapping up an eye, could it become a hurricane? If so...that would mean that models didn't pick up on either Tropical Storm Bret, or even a potential Atlantic hurricane.

I wouldn't say that. Several models had some sort of tropical development off the SE coast in the time period that Bret did indeed develop, and this was 5-7 days before it developed. I certainly wasn't surprised by Bret's formation, nor that it would remain a TS and not go hurricane on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that. Several models had some sort of tropical development off the SE coast in the time period that Bret did indeed develop, and this was 5-7 days before it developed. I certainly wasn't surprised by Bret's formation, nor that it would remain a TS and not go hurricane on us.

Agree. Both Bret and Cindy were in the models well before their development. There was obviously some question on whether they were truly warm core or baroclinic structures in the models, but the deepening surface lows were definitely there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. Both Bret and Cindy were in the models well before their development. There was obviously some question on whether they were truly warm core or baroclinic structures in the models, but the deepening surface lows were definitely there.

Thanks. I was traveling when Cindy was "seen" on models, so I wasn't aware either way. At one point, the feature that led to Bret was forcasted to back in west to SC or GA, which is why I remember it. Eventually, Bret formed later and further south, and got picked up by the westerlies. Could have used the rain myself, especially since I wasn't going to be there to be inconvenienced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. Both Bret and Cindy were in the models well before their development. There was obviously some question on whether they were truly warm core or baroclinic structures in the models, but the deepening surface lows were definitely there.

I should add that I've noticed the models picking up potential tropical development and general location much better in the 7-10 day range than they did just a couple years ago. I recall reading models back then with generous portions of salt with them. Now when I see the GFS or Euro touting a possible development, I take some notice. The models have come a long way tropically in all areas; genesis, track, and somewhat on intensity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should add that I've noticed the models picking up potential tropical development and general location much better in the 7-10 day range than they did just a couple years ago. I recall reading models back then with generous portions of salt with them. Now when I see the GFS or Euro touting a possible development, I take some notice. The models have come a long way tropically in all areas; genesis, track, and somewhat on intensity.

Yep, absolutely. The GFS and Euro are definitely skillful out to 10 days now with TCG forecasts. Even two years ago, they were mostly worthless. The last two upgrades of both models were major improvements in the tropics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, and I didn't keep records or anything, the models did a better job suggesting Bret from a few days out than they did up close. The 0Z run of the Canadian missed Bret completely the day it was classified. The Canadian, I remember, because it is the Joe Bastardi of the globals, a lot of false alarms but rarely, if ever, misses a cyclone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, absolutely. The GFS and Euro are definitely skillful out to 10 days now with TCG forecasts. Even two years ago, they were mostly worthless. The last two upgrades of both models were major improvements in the tropics.

It is odd for me to use GFS in the same sentence as the Euro when talking about quality, but the GFS has earned it, especially in the tropics. If I recall, the GFS sniffed out the first two storms before the Euro did. The upgrades did wonders for the GFS, and I consider it a go to model for TCG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, and I didn't keep records or anything, the models did a better job suggesting Bret from a few days out than they did up close. The 0Z run of the Canadian missed Bret completely the day it was classified. The Canadian, I remember, because it is the Joe Bastardi of the globals, a lot of false alarms but rarely, if ever, misses a cyclone.

Yeah, they weren't very good in the two days before, but both the GFS and Euro nailed it in the MR

It is odd for me to use GFS in the same sentence as the Euro when talking about quality, but the GFS has earned it, especially in the tropics. If I recall, the GFS sniffed out the first two storms before the Euro did. The upgrades did wonders for the GFS, and I consider it a go to model for TCG.

Last summer's upgrade to the GFS made it 1a. in the tropics. I don't use any other models than the GFS and the Euro. Those two models seem to go back and forth for which one is better at sniffing out storms in the MR, but they have both improved leaps and bounds in the last two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, and I didn't keep records or anything, the models did a better job suggesting Bret from a few days out than they did up close. The 0Z run of the Canadian missed Bret completely the day it was classified. The Canadian, I remember, because it is the Joe Bastardi of the globals, a lot of false alarms but rarely, if ever, misses a cyclone.

Agree. The models started backing off on development per se as time got closer, but never gave up on the possibility entirely. My recollection is that they sniffed out TCG at 10 days off Savannah, then decided medium range (5 days) that that was not going to fly and sorta/kinda lost it, and then picked it up again near the Bahamas in the shorter range. I wonder if the trough coming through that area threw the models off and they couldn't see through that fog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...