Jump to content

DDweatherman

Members
  • Posts

    3,597
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DDweatherman

  1. I bet the Rgem looks decent at 0z given where the 18z ggem took the primary on the meteocenter maps.
  2. I was gonna say lol, it's definitely a better look than 18z to me. It's a good 6-8 hours slower too...
  3. All of the above on the souther, slower, wester...all the things thru 66. Need it to not be a sheared mess tho.
  4. Nam thru 48 at h5 a bit slower aka wester and also a bit souther at the base - aka lil' bit more diggy
  5. @NorthArlington101 all pretty encouraging trends and a nice gradual bleed south.
  6. Definitely snow for Mappyland on that frame with a couple good hours of precip left. 1/2 degrees colder down near DC and the column would be nice, probably still snow given the 850’s crash when the low deepens…but non accumulating I’d suspect
  7. 18z Euro as expected was a nice run. 0z will be fun folks. That h90 frame was solid with some more precip to fall and 850’s crashing
  8. Definitely the best presentation so far from anyone in the Canadian family. We’re getting some snow if a 998 primary is around RoA or Danville transferring to the coast.
  9. That low position at sub 1000 is a good look!
  10. I don’t love that, but I do like the axis blizz posted above. If we have a 987 over ocean city Md we’re probably snowing even in this set up. A little more N/S interaction wouldn’t have been bad except where the features are now it would pull things a bit too north for us
  11. It was camps related at 12z it seemed, this frame is beautiful from 18z gefs. I did see low positions and OP was on northern edge
  12. GEFS at 18z gets 4” line down to Baltimore. Op is on the northern side of the low positions envelope. someone throw up the WB if they get a chance to compare to 12z
  13. We hope it still is since the euro is closer and has been trending south along with its ensembles. Wagons south, there’s no way we can get 3 south trends in one winter right?
  14. Yeah 18z wasn’t worse than 12z other than h5/h7 low positioning and that was 25 miles difference. stronger low earlier dynamically got a few places more snow vs 12z, especially further E
  15. Agreed. Low was just more intense on 18z. Actually brings heavier snow closer to m/d line in York county and Lanco than the last 2 runs
  16. In some ways, it did. H5&h7 axis are a few miles north, which we’d want to see go the other way. But, the low is in a similar position as 12z and more amped sooner with a 987 on DE coast. If this storm was 6 hours slower with that same evolution, it would be 6”+ M/D like north. there was a formidable ccb on 18z. If we can get the gfs a bit south like some of the other models at that intensity, it’ll show a primo outcome for most
  17. The more I look at 18z, it seems more of a hold. Might be gfs stopping the bleed and about to head back south a bit
×
×
  • Create New...