-
Posts
35,921 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About bluewave

Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location:
KHVN
Recent Profile Visitors
56,687 profile views
-
Miss the 2010-2018 KU benchmark era when we could lock in a 168 hr euro control run showing a near 950 mb low close to the benchmark and have it be correct. https://www.weather.gov/okx/Blizzard_Jan42018
-
Better to rely on the the various ensemble means at this point which show a less amplified solution than the OP GFS due the fast flow and kicker lows coming into the West Coast at that time.
-
Occasionally, we do get a colder month across the CONUS. This is the first several weeks of colder conditions since January. But these colder periods have been few and far between. So they tend to stand out when they occur and get more attention than the persistent warmth which has become the new normal. I will update the chart below when December data gets posted.
-
30 years since the mid 90s and over 100 years prior to that period isn’t a small sample size. What you describe as rigid is actually a very comprehensive approach which I have used with great success for long range outlooks. Since my approach is data driven, I haven’t come to any firm ideas yet on whether we can eventually shift back to at least some occasional benchmark tracks in the future. But the long term decline in snowfall has been unmistakable. So I leave open the idea of a bounce off these lows in coming years if we can weaken the Pacific Jet a bit. But this is very uncertain since the recent shifts have been so extreme.
-
We haven’t had a single average or above average snowfall season since the mid 90s without having at least one NESIS 1 or higher BM KU snowstorm. So KU benchmark storms have been mandatory for reaching average to above average snow since 93-94. Prior to the mid 90s this wasn’t the case in the much colder climate. We could string together a series of smaller snow events and reach into the 20s for snowfall.
-
Fits the Great Lakes cutter, I-78 to I-84 hugger and Rain-snow gradient, and suppressed Southern stream which has dominated since 2018-2019. Very difficult to achieve a true benchmark KU track with such a fast Pacific Jet. Way too many issues with kicker lows, amplified ridges pushing the gradient just north of NYC, and generally very poor wavelength spacing with so many shortwaves racing through the fast flow.
-
Ski resorts continue to be the big winner the overpowering Northern Stream of the Pacific Jet.
-
My early guess for January is that it will be warmer on average across the entire CONUS than last January was which finished as the 33rd coldest. All our multi year La Nina’s last 30 years have had one January which was on the colder side like last January while the others have been milder. But don’t have feel yet what the general 500mb pattern will be and where the warm and cold anomalies will set up or how much warmer specifically this January will be.
-
After midnight highs today. This happens quite a bit with Arctic fronts. Some of the great Arctic outbreaks from 77 to 94 would have had lower daily maxes if the front was just a little faster. SXUS51 KOKX 080557 OSOOKX New York City Metropolitan Area Weather Roundup National Weather Service New York NY 100 AM EST MON DEC 08 2025 CITY SKY/WX TMP DP RH WIND PRES REMARKS Central Park PTCLDY 38 24 57 VRB7 30.05R WCI 33 LaGuardia Arpt PTCLDY 40 21 46 W16G23 30.03R WCI 31 Kennedy Intl PTCLDY 37 27 67 W9 30.05R WCI 30 Newark Liberty PTCLDY 37 25 61 W8 30.04S WCI 31 Teterboro Arpt PTCLDY 36 25 64 W7 30.03S WCI 30 Bronx Lehman C N/A 37 27 65 W6 N/A WCI 33 Queens College N/A 39 27 60 W9 N/A WCI 33 Breezy Point N/A 37 N/A N/A W12 N/A WCI 30 Brooklyn Coll N/A 39 28 65 W10 N/A WCI 32 Staten Island N/A 36 28 75 W6 N/A WCI 31
-
This has been due to the inability of the models to resolve the split forcing pattern which has been in place this month so far. So the first 16 days of the month will verify significantly colder than the long range forecasts were indicating back in late November. La Nina’s often had colder patterns in December so this isn’t that much of a surprise. The interference pattern has created a cold MJO 6 type and not the canonical MJO 8 pattern and storm track. This is due to the forcing near the MJO 4-6 regions with the standing wave. So now that the models have a consolidation of forcing there as the forcing weakens over the Western Hemisphere, they are showing the seasonal moderation in temperatures we often see beginning in mid-December. The last few days have been the first time in a while that they are actually raising heights more than in earlier runs. So the ridge coming east faster is a function of the big Jet extension and MJO 4-6 forcing. Remember last early December how the models underestimated the mid to late December Jet extension and lower Pacific heights. New run faster Pacific Jet lowering heights more over Western North America and raising heights in the East Old run weaker Pacific Jet and stronger ridge out West
-
These charts below do a good job showing the current burst of stronger forcing in the MJO 4-6 areas. I suspect it’s one of the reasons we aren’t getting the canonical MJO 8 even with the RMMS in that space. This is why I like to look at the total forcing when they are out of alignment with the RMMS. Notice that the Pacific Jet hasn’t relaxed and we have a dominant northern stream. So even though we are experiencing a colder pattern since late November, the warmer storm track of the last 7 years hasn’t varied. This was the case during some of the colder intervals last winter also. Models are beginning to come into better agreement for the relaxation of the cold as the falling AAM and MJO 4-6 forcing supports a broad ridge across the U.S. mid to late month. This is a seasonal shift that we have seen frequently approaching mid to late December over the last decade. We had a big jet extension last December at this time also when the temperatures moderated.
-
The current standing wave in MJO 4-6 will consolidate the forcing there leading to a jet extension in around 10 days and the ridge getting pushed east with the falling AAM.
-
The runoff is leading to higher salt content in the drinking water supply for areas around NYC and NJ. https://apnews.com/article/new-york-city-reservoirs-salt-c5d67e6c626878d0993974498c4629b6 The suburban reservoirs that supply 10% of New York City’s vaunted drinking water are getting saltier due to decades of road salt being spread near the system — and they will eventually have to be abandoned if nothing is done to reverse the trend, city officials warn. https://patch.com/new-jersey/bridgewater/salty-taste-nj-drinking-water-linked-use-salt-brine-roads NEW JERSEY — Have you noticed a salty taste in your water recently? New Jersey American Water said it is due to the use of salt and brine for public safety during the recent extreme winter weather and ongoing drought conditions. The water company shared a notice with customers about the change in taste on Friday.
-
Has been a common theme in recent years with the heavy road salting especially behind the 18-wheelers.
-
Some reservoirs in NNJ dipping under 50% with the below normal rainfall since the fall of 2024. https://dep.nj.gov/drought/current-conditions/#reservoir-levels
