donsutherland1

It’s done well at 500 mb, but not as well with specific synoptic events. I suspect it’s still a year or two away from doing better with such events (assuming that it’s still “learning” in real-time).

I suspect that it may be another year or two before AI becomes decisively more skillful with its forecasts. Sooner would be better.

It has been very consistent.

For reference, the 1/16 18z AIFS 12-hour precipitation forecast for the upcoming storm:

Light snow in Larchmont, NY:

Clouds will break and any lingering flurries will end early tomorrow. Readings will climb into the upper 30s by day's end. The weekend will start out even milder with temperatures topping out in the lower and perhaps middle 40s. Afterward, an Arctic front will move across the region on Sunday with some periods of rain and/or snow. Any accumulations should be light. Behind the front, January will see its first genuine Arctic air mass. During January 20-23, it is likely that New York City will experience its coldest weather this winter. Temperatures could fall into the single digits for lows in New York City, Philadelphia, and perhaps even Washington, DC. The last single-digit lows were as follows: Baltimore: December 24, 2022 (6°) Boston: February 4, 2023 (-10°) New York City: February 4, 2023 (3°) Newark: February 4, 2023 (5°) Philadelphia: December 24, 2022 (7°) Washington, DC: December 24, 2022 (9°) Highs could reach no higher than the teens in New York City and perhaps Philadelphia during the peak of the cold. The last time both cities had high temperatures in the teens was: New York City: December 24, 2022 (15°) Philadelphia: December 24, 2022 (18°) Moderation is possible during the last week of January. There is potential for snow to accompany the arrival of the Arctic air and perhaps afterward. However, with the AO forecast to become predominantly positive with the exception of a window during the January 18-24 period, prospects for a 6" or above snowstorm in the New York City and Philadelphia areas could become limited after January 24th. Opportunities for a 6" or above snowstorm would likely persist for parts of southern New England, including Boston, through January. At present, it appears that New York City and Philadelphia may be in line for one or two snowfalls. The first such snowfall is likely on Sunday into Monday. That snowfall could be the larger of the two possible snow events in New York City and Philadelphia. If things come together, a moderate snowfall is possible. The second snowfall is possible with a larger storm that will likely be passing far to the south and east of the region from Tuesday into Thursday. The second storm has the potential to bring measurable snowfall to Atlanta, Charleston, Norfolk, and Wilmington, NC. The last time that happened was during what became known as the Boxing Day Blizzard of December 25-27, 2010. This time around the storm track will likely be more suppressed to the south likely limiting snowfall to light amounts in the New York City and Philadelphia areas. Parts of the Southeast could see a significant snow, sleet, and ice event from this storm. The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was +0.3°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -0.7°C for the week centered around January 8. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged -0.02°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -0.70°C. La Niña conditions are underway and will likely persist into the start of spring. The SOI was +6.08 today. The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was +1.325 today. Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied 93% probability that New York City will have a colder than normal January (1991-2020 normal). January will likely finish with a mean temperature near 30.0° (3.9° below normal).

2017-18. 2009-10 was the last winter with all three months below normal.

There were a number of storms that occurred with similar 500 mb patterns during January 16-February 7, 1950-2024. None of them were major East Coast snowstorms. Composite 500 mb pattern: January 31, 1950: Boston: 3.9"; New York City: 0.4"; Philadelphia: None February 1-2, 1950: Boston: 0.1"; New York City: 2.2"; Philadelphia: 0.9" January 31-February 2, 1957: Boston: 2.4"; New York City: 6.4"; Philadelphia: 0.8" January 19-20, 2002: Boston: 4.5"; New York City: 3.0"; Philadelphia: 4.0" (probably the worst fit of the similar 500 mb patterns) Synoptic details would be important once one gets closer to any event, should the pattern hold.

So far, NYC is having its 6th coldest January since 2010, but the coldest period still lies ahead. By the time the month is finished, January 2025 will likely be among the five coldest Januaries since 2010.

A colder air mass has returned to the region. Temperatures will generally average below normal across the region through Thursday or Friday before it turns briefly milder. Some snow flurries or even a period of light snow is possible tomorrow afternoon into Friday morning as milder air begins to push into the region. Highs will mainly be in the lower 30s and lows will mainly be in the lower 20s in New York City and Philadelphia and teens outside the Cities through Thursday. Temperatures should return to the upper 30s on Friday. An extended period of generally below normal temperatures is underway in the New York City area. The cold regime will likely last into at least the fourth week of January. The third week of January could see the month's first genuine Arctic outbreak around the the January 20-23 period. It is likely that New York City will experience its coldest weather this winter. Temperatures could fall into the low teens or even the single digits for lows. Moderation is possible during the closing days of January. There is potential for some snow to accompany the arrival of the Arctic air and perhaps afterward. However, with the AO forecast to become predominantly positive with the exception of a window during the January 18-24 period, prospects for a 6" or above snowstorm in the New York City and Philadelphia areas could become limited. At present, it appears that both cities may only be in line for light snowfalls, one on Sunday into Monday with another storm passing far to the south and east on Tuesday into Wednesday and possibly bringing some light snow or flurries mainly from southern New Jersey and southward. The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was +0.3°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -0.7°C for the week centered around January 8. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged -0.02°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -0.70°C. La Niña conditions are underway and will likely persist into the start of spring. The SOI was -3.86 today. The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was +1.742 today. Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied 93% probability that New York City will have a colder than normal January (1991-2020 normal). January will likely finish with a mean temperature near 30.0° (3.9° below normal).

Yes. I recall it well, as I was visiting my sister in Patchogue at the time. Photo from Patchogue:

NYC’s last daily snowfall of 4” or more occurred on January 29, 2022 when 7.3” fell. The January 28-29, 2022 storm dumped 8.5” of snow.

The persistence of the warmth has been remarkable. January 1-13, 2025 is running just over 0.1°C above January 2024 for the same timeframe on ERA-5.

A colder air mass has returned to the region. Temperatures will generally average below normal across the region through Thursday or Friday before it turns briefly milder. Highs will mainly be in the lower 30s and lows will mainly be in the lower 20s in New York City and Philadelphia and teens outside the Cities through Thursday. An extended period of generally below normal temperatures is underway in the New York City area. The cold regime will likely last into at least the fourth week of January. The third week of January could see the month's first genuine Arctic outbreak around the the January 20-23 period. Moreover, there is a chance that New York City could experience temperatures falling into the low teens or even the single digits for lows. Moderation is possible during the closing days of January. There is potential for some snow to accompany the arrival of the Arctic air and perhaps afterward. However, with the AO forecast to become predominantly positive with the exception of a window during the January 18-24 period, prospects of a 6" or above snowstorm in the New York City and Philadelphia areas could be limited. The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was +0.3°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -0.7°C for the week centered around January 8. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged -0.02°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -0.70°C. La Niña conditions are underway and will likely persist into the start of spring. The SOI was -18.41 today. The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was +1.483 today. Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied 89% probability that New York City will have a colder than normal January (1991-2020 normal). January will likely finish with a mean temperature near 30.2° (3.7° below normal).

Next week will likely see temperatures bottom out in the lower teens or possibly even single digits in New York City as a genuine Arctic air mass overspreads the region. However, the cold air coming from near or off Russia is not exceptionally cold for the season, so that precludes the kind of strong Arctic outbreaks seen in 1985, 1994, and 2016.

For context, the Winter 2024-25 mean temperature (through January 13th) is 36.6° in New York City.

Unfortunately, a growing convergence of factors makes the kind of global cooperation that led to the Montreal Protocol to protect the ozone layer unlikely anytime soon when it comes to addressing fossil fuel burning. I don't see that changing for at least this decade, as the factors underpinning the status quo are likely too strong to overcome.

The aerosols were progressively reduced due to their health impact. It was only later that scientists concluded that aerosols had driven the post-1950 cooling. Aerosol injections could well have unintended adverse consequences. I still believe the better route is to address the root cause of the issue, namely the burning of fossil fuels. But, we'll see where things are in the 2030s.

The Earth was also gradually cooling, as it turned out from rising aerosols that were gradually reducing the amount of energy from the sun reaching the Earth. There were extensive deep pools of cold and sufficient blocking to lock in the cold in the Northeast.

Here's a list of New York City's coldest winters since 1950:

A cold front will cross the region tonight or early tomorrow morning, possibly with some snow flurries. In its wake, temperatures will again be below normal through at least Friday. Highs will mainly be in the lower 30s and lows will mainly be in the lower 20s in New York City and Philadelphia and teens outside the Cities. An extended period of generally below normal temperatures is underway in the New York City area. The cold regime will likely last into at least the fourth week of January. The third week of January could see the month's first genuine Arctic outbreak around the the January 20-23 period. There is potential for some snow to accompany the arrival of the Arctic air. Moreover, there is a chance that New York City could experience temperatures falling into the low teens or even the single digits for lows. Moderation is possible during the closing days of January. There is potential for some snow to accompany the arrival of the Arctic air. However, with the AO forecast to become predominantly positive with the exception of a window during the January 18-24 period, prospects of a 6" or above snowstorm in the New York City and Philadelphia areas could be limited. The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was +0.3°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -0.7°C for the week centered around January 8. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged -0.02°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -0.70°C. La Niña conditions are underway and will likely persist into the start of spring. The SOI was -19.12 today. The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was +0.303 today. Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied 88% probability that New York City will have a colder than normal January (1991-2020 normal). January will likely finish with a mean temperature near 30.3° (3.6° below normal).

° As the maps are already available, it's difficult to envision their disappearance. That shifts the focus to calling out misuse of the maps for lack of a better description. The lack of accountability--lack of verification of forecasts on social media, for example--may well open the door to an entrepreneurial opportunity for meteorologists who not only post forecasts, but also verify the outcomes. That may offer them a competitive edge over their rivals who don't verify forecasts. But verification requires a degree of work (but AI can facilitate setting up the charts and tables, even the programming involved so the added work would probably not be substantial) and willingness to accept good and occasionally bad results. My guess is that if verification were involved, the practice of posting extreme maps that lead to 20°+ errors over 8-day periods from 5+ weeks out (or excessive snowfall maps), would cease. Such enormous errors speak for themselves.

The 1989 storm also missed, but the 500 mb pattern for that storm was different.

I agree. The event on the 22nd kind of reminds me, at least right now, of the February 6-7, 1980 storm that dumped > 10" at Norfolk but very little up in the NYC area. Fortunately, that's still far out, so things can change. At least there is some storminess.

Apparently, the climate change denier who had no idea that drought products exist (and no idea southern California was in a drought), much less knowledge of flash droughts, has attacked Dr. Kalmus's op-ed. In doing so, he just further exposed that he is essentially illiterate on weather and climate. He has no conception that the fossil fuel burning leads to a warming climate, greater vapor pressure deficits, and increased frequency of drought/emergence of flash drought. All of those antecedent conditions ensure that any fires that start--be they from lightning or human-causes (accidental or otherwise)--will be more intense, more extensive, and more severe.