weatherwiz

Going to be one heck of a forced line with wind damage.

yeah if we see a stronger and deepening low just to our west its game on for some wind wind inland. At least right now though, this could be a huge wind issue towards the coast of Connecticut and eastern New England. IIRC, for coastal areas the strongest winds tend to be just a bit inland away from the water. Though an inversion may not be a huge issue in this one with temps/dews around 60.

SPC going to have to expand the general thunder line farther north...may even see a marginal risk added. Could see some convectively driven damaging wind gusts potential and even a low end risk for a tornado just to our southwest

Sounding on the CAPE. That's serious stuff just above the ground Connecticut shoreline just a bit inland

We can make a new thread for January and propose dates...maybe even add in some February too. The earlier the better so people can check schedules, etc.

Confidence in mid-to-late month has to be extremely low right now.

That was probably dumb of me yesterday to think there was a shot to see things trend not as warm on the GFS. Anyways, we know inversions can tend to screw us and limit wind potential but if we see sfc temps and dews push 60 and get convection into play...an inversion won't be much of a concern. We'll see how far west and how far inland the wind potential gets but this could be a pretty big deal for eastern sections, especially towards the Cape and coastal Maine. Could be something a little more than our typical cool season wind events.

GFS even with a touch of sfc instability (even the NAM). We see dews push 60 and this will be wild. These bulk shear values are insane...nearly 110 knots. Lets get a forced line going

I guess I just wouldn't be surprised if we see a bit of a trend towards the warmth not getting as far inland. But I suppose there won't be much to stop warmth from flooding in just south of the warm front.

I would think the warm front would struggle to propel northwards through the region. The SLP track is a bit too east and also noting the multiple waves developing along it. Probably end up seeing a funky looking sfc warm front.

Part of me thinks the GFS is a bit too aggressive with the warmth into SNE Wednesday. Coastal areas yes but I question how far north we'll see 50's surge.

I'm fine with that. I would like to get to see as many people as possible. Clarke's would be out for me but we can re-tackle Funky's after the New Year.

You don't see it too much around here but sometimes its a riot seeing what MOS/NBM has for some of the midwestern cities. You can sometimes see like a 15-20F difference in the forecast high or sometimes even the low. Not of course you would divulge into the details and should be able to develop a sense of what to expect but sometimes that along can't be enough if you don't understand the local climate.

I know at the end of the day when it comes to forecasting temperatures this does require a bit of effort if you want to be really accurrate and get within a degree or two. I know when I used to do the wxchallenge I used to spend like 30 minutes for the high/low temp Anyways, MOS/NBM have been atrocious the last month...not just here but across a good part of the country. I get they have limitations with specific patterns and such but these products can be downright embarrassing. Forecasting too cold at night when it doesn't get that cold, then when they forecast on the warmer side it ends up much colder. They will underperform on highs plenty of times and then rare times they underperform on highs when it didn't seem like that would be the case. It sucks when you have to solely use these products for temperatures because they're awful really.

I buy northern New England and the higher terrain of Mass coming out of mid-week with plowable accumulations. Have to watch for some powerful winds northeast coast of Maine too.

This is true...hopefully something that can work to our benefit once we get a bit deeper in the month and towards January.

I would favor something more in January or even February. Its after the holiday...still may be tough for kids in winter sports (I know basketball can run into March).

It seems like this has been a crazy theme the last several winters. Even when we are in a good pattern, we can't seem to get something to work and when we do get storms the trough axis develops just too far west and we're getting flow blown warm sector. Is it possible the warm waters are having a big influence in this? Part of me is curious on this but on the other hand, it's not like we see fronts and boundary's struggle to get off the coast but it seems that now consistently these type of setups cyclogenesis is just way too far west for us. Doesn't even seem to matter what the overall regime is, the evolution seems to gravitate towards this.

I plan on going but if there isn't enough of a turnout I'm fine with another date too.

Definitely going to give this a read, thank you! And that was something I was going to mention too...don't current NWP models already have some degree of AI integrated into them? But looks and sounds like that will be established in the paper.

Agree, poorly worded by me. I am definitely interested in reading literature on this and I am certainly open to having a completely different view on this. What really irks me though (and not just with AI) is these watered down articles and and all these claims made just to draw people in, especially from companies and organizations who profit on marketing stuff...you can make anything sound good and like the best thing ever and sell it to the average Joe.

That's possible but I mean if the accuracy is because it had temperatures of 88-90 (which verified) versus 84-86 which other models had...I can't see that being a huge impact on the power grid. I would want to know more details though. For example, say google AI was showing a large area of high temperatures in the 105-110 range at D10 and the GFS was a bit more muted...100-105. What preparations would be made differently within the energy industry, for example? Now...if we're talking where this was showing widespread 100+ while other models were like 70-80 and this 100+ is verifying...now that is noteworthy and certainly something more groundbreaking.

Want to clarify...I was calling the claim garbage, not the model or the work into it. If a claim is going to be made that a weather event was nailed 10 days our or 15 days out...at least indicate the model held true to that solution for each run leading up to that day. If google AI had a category 3 hitting SNE at D15 and it ended up occurring...if between it showed solutions ranging from OTS or into the mid-Atlantic, or a weak storm...well you can't say it "nailed it". That's what I am calling garbage

So it has greater skill with 2m temperature, sea-level pressure, and wind? That isn't exactly mind blowing, IMO.