Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    77,517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by weatherwiz

  1. One concern I've always had with this is where will your subsidence zone be? Anytime you are dealing with CCB you're going to have a subsidence zone. I was thinking some days ago we could see two fronto bands develop (one north closer to 700 warm front and one just north of the sfc low). Then it was a question would these two converge, and where? I think the one thing we have to watch is how organized this storm becomes...how tightly wrapped do the 850 and 700 lows get? As the system is developing and strengthening, the fronto band is going to be far removed from the lows...so this makes sense that dendrite's area could be in a great spot. But as or if things tighten, we would see the banding drop south, closer to the lows. This is going to be important when looking for the higher amounts across Connecticut.
  2. I've been in contact with Walt and the hope is it will be fixed soon. I've been mostly using the 700 fronto on the NAM on cod or TT.
  3. I think this is a pretty tough forecast for CT. I guess though it depends on what one is expecting in terms of snowfall totals but I would hedge towards the lower side of the spectrum.
  4. Not only is NAM pretty juiced but was looking at some soundings and it has one helluva MAUL. 700-500 lapse rates are quite steep. We get maximized lift in there and snowfall rates could end up being something like 2''+ per hour for a bit somewhere.
  5. That is a very funky HRRR run. Quite a bit going on with some funky warm layers and looks like some dry or drier pockets mixed in. Luckily its the HRRR in the extended range
  6. Thinking a good 5-8'' of snow across Connecticut with about 3-5'' along the immediate shoreline. Going to put together a map later this afternoon after work stuff all done. The 5'' side though along the immediate shoreline may be too high though but we'll see after assessing everything in full after Euro.
  7. I will say...I'm just glad it was nothing like 18z. I still don't think the NAM is worth a crap with this system until its mesoscale time but if it stayed coarse it would have to be a bit of a caution flag.
  8. There are two things I am really curious about: 1) How cold temperatures can get tomorrow night 2) How much temperatures climb Saturday Should probably do an airmass trajectory on this, but looks like the airmass is advecting in from the central states. Guidance for last night within the mid-west was wayyy colder than what verified. Not sure this means anything but just a thought in my mind. It clouds very quickly and with not much mixing, temperatures may not rise all that much from whatever they fall to Friday night. Obviously along the immediate coast temps probably get well into the 30's but that should be a pretty shallow layer. Ultimately, I don't see a track north enough to warrant concerns for mixing or wet snow except for immediate shorelines
  9. 18z GFS bufkit for BDL. Still some solid lift into the DGZ. I switched snow ratio from cobb to max temp in profile just to smooth it out a bit. Otherwise it looks like my heartbreak watching this Bruins game
  10. Definitely a nice hit on the Euro. Looks a bit progressive which could make some of the higher range potential difficult to obtain but who cares. Great hit for all
  11. Lift too...lift is extremely important as is snowgrowth. You can have all the QPF you want and favorable thermals, if lift and snow growth suck you're going to be disappointed.
  12. I first came across that from you. It's such an amazing product/tool. Oh man...I know what you're talking about I think with the SDs. I might have that bookmark actually (though might be on my personal computer). It is possible that is no longer operational as well. If I can find it I'll drop it and see if that's what you're referring too.
  13. Unfortunately no. Sent a message to Walt. They're aware but it's a low priority fix right now but hopefully soon.
×
×
  • Create New...